Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Russia offers Turkey S400 Missile Defence System coproduction

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    19 Aug 08
    Posts
    32

    Russia offers Turkey S400 Missile Defence System coproduction

    Russia renews missile offer to Turkey
    Mon, 21 Jul 2008 05:13:53 GMT
    The Russian offer was initially made in mid-June in Moscow when Turkish military officials visited Russia.

    The Turkish officials said that Moscow's offer would be considered by the Under-Secretariat for the Defense Industry (SSM) -- the civilian military procurement agency -- and not by them.

    This is while the SSM had earlier turned down a Russian offer for the direct sale of S-400 missiles through state-to-state negotiations, advising Russia to participate in a tender opened by Ankara for the acquisition of long-range air and missile defense systems.

    The Chinese with the HQ-9 air-defense system, as well as Israeli aerospace industries (IAI) with its Arrow missiles, are also competing in the tender.

    But the main competition has been between Moscow and Washington, as the latter already warned Ankara that the purchase of Russian missiles will create an interoperability problem with NATO.

    However, the SSM might be inclined to favor the Russian bid if Moscow comes up with an offer to transfer high technology as well as more work share to the local companies, backing a Turkish policy of boosting local industry.

    FTP/FF/BGH
    Source: Press TV - Russia renews missile offer to Turkey
    TURKEY PONDERS RUSSIAN MISSILE OFFER

    By John C. K. Daly

    Wednesday, July 23, 2008


    As Turkey moves to upgrade its weapons systems, Ankara is considering all options and possible suppliers, including Moscow. The value of such runs into billions of dollars, generating intense competition, particularly over contracts to supply Turkey with an advanced surface-to-air missile system, with potential capabilities against ballistic missiles. While Turkey’s relations with Syria and Iran are generally good, many Turkish government and military officials share the West’s long-term concerns about Iran’s growing interest and capabilities in missiles and weapons of mass destruction (see EDM, May 7).

    Turkey’s civilian agency for military procurement, the Undersecretariat for the Defense Industry (SSM), is advising the Defense Ministry and has the final say on the tenders. Russia’s S-400 “Triumph,” NATO-codenamed SA-21 “Growler,” is competing against the American companies Lockheed Martin and Raytheon, which offer a combination of Patriot Advanced Capability-3 (PAC 3) and PAC 2 ABMs. Another American entrant, Boeing, is offering its Arrow missile system, developed jointly with Israel’s Aerospace Industries (IAI). The Chinese HQ-9 air defense system is also in the contest.

    According to sources within Turkish defense industry, Russia’s arms export agency Rosoboronexport has attempted to sidestep the SSM’s Request for Proposal (RfP) procedure. Rosoboronexport, which has been lobbying for the contract since March 2007, switched its offer last month into direct state-to-state negotiations, trying to sell a dozen S-400 missile systems worth $4 billion (Zaman, July 21). The SSM earlier rebuffed the Kremlin’s offer of direct sales, advising Rosoboronexport instead to submit a RfP.

    An issue yet to be resolved is Turkey’s interest in winning bids incorporating both technology transfer and indigenous manufacturing of system components in Turkey. That issue has in the past has bedeviled U.S. attempts to sell advanced fighter aircraft to Turkey because of disputes over their accompanying aviation software packages. Reflecting U.S. concern over Ankara’s consideration of the Russian bid, U.S. Secretary of Defense Robert Gates during a visit to Ankara cautioned that such a purchase would interfere with NATO interoperability standards. Gates pointed out that Ankara could and should discuss the purchase with its Allies (Millet Haber, May 7).

    According to Russia’s Air Defense Forces Commander, Colonel-General Yury Solovyov, the S-400 boasts a launch speed of up to 3 miles per second and can intercept and destroy airborne targets at a range of up to 250 miles, which is twice the defensive range of the MIM-104 Patriot and 2.5 times that of its predecessor, the S-300PMU-2. Further according to Solovyov, the S-400 could also be used for limited purposes in space defense, but was not designed for intercepting and destroying intercontinental ballistic missiles (RIA-Novosti, June 12).

    It is a measure of Moscow’s eagerness to conclude the sale that Russia’s own armed forces have yet themselves to be equipped with this system. According to Russia’s Air Force Commander, Colonel-General Aleksandr Zelin, the first battalion of S-400 missiles defending Moscow and Central Russia was scheduled to become operational on July 1, 2007, but the date was postponed (RIA Novosti, May 21, July 7). And according to the Air Force’s air defense chief, Lieutenant-General Aleksandr Gorkov, Russia plans to deploy new air defense systems, primarily around Russia’s important administrative and political centers, in two stages until 2015 (RIA Novosti, July 13).

    Despite the system’s teething problems, then-President Vladimir Putin was sufficiently impressed with the Almaz Central Design Bureau’s S-400 that on April 30 he issued a presidential decree awarding state orders and medals to designers of the Antaeus S-400 system (ÎÀÎ "Êîíöåðí ÏÂÎ "Àëìàç - Àíòåé").

    Following a July 22 meeting of the Turkish Defense Industry Executive Board chaired by Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Defense Minister Vecdi Gonul told journalists that the board had approved opening negotiations with the Anglo-German joint venture Howaldtswerke-Deutsche Werft and Marine Force International (HDW-MFI) about building six diesel electric U-214 design submarines in a contract potentially worth $4 billion (Haber, July 22). Under the terms of the proposed contract, the boats are to be constructed at Turkey's Golcuk Naval Shipyard, with the first submarine to be delivered in 2015. Besides Erdogan and Gonul, the other Executive Board members are the General Staff Chief, Army Gen. Yasar Buyukanit, and chief procurement official Murad Bayar.

    Among the other bidders on the Turkish tender were France’s DCNS (Armaris) and Spain’s Navantia S.A. (Sabah, July 23). Lockheed Martin, competing for the missile PfP, was also involved as systems integrator with the Navantia offer.

    Howaldtswerke, based in Lubeck, has over the last five decades built more than 100 submarines for fifteen different nations, including Israel’s Dolphin-class boats. No U.S. companies competed directly for the Turkish submarine tender, as the U.S. shut down its diesel submarine production lines in the 1950s after the U.S. Navy submarine program switched to nuclear propulsion.

    In line with Turkey’s interest in indigenous production, Gonul said that Turkish industrial participation would be worth around 80 percent of the total value of the project, with Turkish industrial subcontractors providing about 20 of the submarines’ systems and sub-systems (Hurriyet, July 23).

    The Turkish Navy’s U-214 submarine, operated by a 40-man crew, will have a 50-day patrol capability and a 12,000-mile operational range. Under the terms of the tender, 15 percent of the project’s cost will be paid in advance, with the remainder covered by a loan (Sabah, July 23).

    As Turkey upgrades its military capabilities, Ankara is insisting that technology transfer be an integral part of successful bids. While Washington has thus far been hesitant to agree to such terms, preferring to provide “complete” weapons packages, Moscow is more flexible on the issue. This indicates that the Pentagon’s previous hammerlock on its allies’ weapons purchases may be a thing of the past, and Ankara finds itself in the luxurious position of choosing between multiple offers, a pattern that arms manufacturers are likely to encounter increasingly in the future.
    Source: TURKEY PONDERS RUSSIAN MISSILE OFFER - Eurasia Daily Monitor
    Turkey is once again showing that it has the luxury of choosing between weapons suppliers. Turkish officials look at the S400 with certainty as Rosoboronexport is the only company in the tender to offer technology transfer to Turkey. The US and Israel will not even negotiate tech transfer. Whereas, Russia has offered full tech transfer. Depsite repeated warnings from Washington it looks as though Turkey will be the first to receive the S400.
    Last edited by turki_de; 19 Aug 08, at 23:27.

  2. #2
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    14 Mar 08
    Posts
    1,433
    My, the Russians really are trying to push the S400 on everyone. Though if it's nearly as good as they claim it to be, they just have to wait for China and the rest to come crowding outside their doors.

  3. #3
    S2
    S2 is offline

    Military Professional
    Military Professional S2's Avatar
    Join Date
    11 Sep 06
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    9,529

    Skywatcher Reply

    "My, the Russians really are trying to push the S400 on everyone."

    Yeah, not sure that they've offered to us. Loved to buy a couple though if just for a look-see. Maybe the Turkish Army will cut us a little slack there.
    "This aggression will not stand, man!" Jeff Lebowski
    "The only true currency in this bankrupt world is what you share with someone else when you're uncool." Lester Bangs

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    19 Aug 08
    Posts
    32
    Quote Originally Posted by S-2 View Post
    "My, the Russians really are trying to push the S400 on everyone."

    Yeah, not sure that they've offered to us. Loved to buy a couple though if just for a look-see. Maybe the Turkish Army will cut us a little slack there.
    I know that ASELSAN (a Turkish company) and Boeing are working on the world's next generation Balistic Missile Defence Shield. Hopefully, Turkey can also bring know how gained from S400 co-production into this joint project in the future.

    Boeing: Boeing and Turkey's HAVELSAN Renew Missile Defense Partnership

    BOEING & HAVELSAN ANNOUNCE MISSILE DEFENCE PARTNERSHIP. | AsiaPulse News (February, 2003)

  5. #5
    S2
    S2 is offline

    Military Professional
    Military Professional S2's Avatar
    Join Date
    11 Sep 06
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    9,529

    turki di Reply

    "I know that ASELSAN (a Turkish company) and Boeing are working on the world's next generation Balistic Missile Defence Shield. Hopefully, Turkey can also bring know how gained from S400 co-production into this joint project in the future."

    That would be nice but, separately, we'd love to discuss the S400's capabilities with your professionals.

    I'd expect that Iran might be a prospective Russian customer and since they've chosen to liberate U.S. Army Hum-vees in Georgia, there's little liklihood that Russia will be sharing performance parameters anytime soon.
    Last edited by S2; 20 Aug 08, at 00:59.
    "This aggression will not stand, man!" Jeff Lebowski
    "The only true currency in this bankrupt world is what you share with someone else when you're uncool." Lester Bangs

  6. #6
    WAB Resident Historian Senior Contributor Kansas Bear's Avatar
    Join Date
    01 Jul 06
    Location
    Talisker distillery
    Posts
    1,705
    Think I could get a few to park in my front yard??

  7. #7
    Military Professional
    Join Date
    19 Jun 07
    Posts
    320
    Follow up co-production is one of the prerequisites of the T-MALADMIS and T-LALADMIS projects. With the introduction of the S-400 system into the bargain, and technology transfer prospect, we will hopefully have a better bargaining hand on the table for long range systems.

    The completion of these projects will address shortcomings of the Turkish Armed Forces. Currently we are not fielding any modern medium to long range Air Defence systems.

    A second remark, despite official claims to the contrary, we have not noticed interoperability problems with Russian/Soviet and Chinese missiles. Air defence and anti armor systems have been successfully tested on proving grounds, in terms of both performance and interoperability. Only minor modifications are necessary.

  8. #8
    Senior Contributor Yusuf's Avatar
    Join Date
    26 Dec 07
    Location
    Bangalore
    Posts
    2,126
    Coming soon after US Poland deal makes the offer look fishy.

  9. #9
    Banned
    Join Date
    19 Aug 08
    Posts
    32
    Quote Originally Posted by Yusuf View Post
    Coming soon after US Poland deal makes the offer look fishy.
    The offer was made in June this year. That is, prior to the crisis in Georgia and prior to the missile defence shield in Poland.

    Also, do not forget that Turkey is an important NATO member. Greece who also happens to be a NATO member deploys the S300.

    Nothing fishy at all....Ankara is simply looking for technology transfer.

  10. #10
    Defense Professional Dreadnought's Avatar
    Join Date
    12 May 05
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA.
    Posts
    13,903
    Considering the hardware and other stations in Turkey the US Army has I doubt it will go through. Unless something has changed since then.
    Fortitude.....The strength to persist...The courage to endure.

  11. #11
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    14 Mar 08
    Posts
    1,433
    The Russians might just be looking for more money, nothing more than that. If they significantly alter the software for the export models, they theoretically shouldn't have to worry too much about the other NATO members snooping around the S-400. China and Iran might not be too thrilled about that though.

  12. #12
    Banned
    Join Date
    19 Aug 08
    Posts
    32
    Quote Originally Posted by Dreadnought View Post
    Considering the hardware and other stations in Turkey the US Army has I doubt it will go through. Unless something has changed since then.
    Unless the US or Israel offers full technology transfer in the tender, Russia will get the tender with full certainty. After all, Turkish procurement officials are bound by Turkish legislation to choose firstly the company which offers full technology transfer. Because I don't see the US or Israel transfering such crtical technology, the Russians will surely get this tender.

    In relation to Turkey being a Nato member, this can no influence on the deal. Greece is also a Nato member but deploys the S300. Furthermore, Turkey has already made Military acquisitions from Russia, including Anti-tank missiles and APC's. It is planned anyway under the tender that Turkey will supply the Identification, Friend or Foe system and some other sub-systems for the high altitute defence shield.

  13. #13
    Patron
    Join Date
    26 Aug 08
    Posts
    193
    Wouldn't the S-400 be a welcome addition to india's missile shield development programme ?..or have they completely americanized and looking forward to the 'patriot' system after the nuclear deal goes through

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Worlds Most Advance War Ship
    By Simullacrum in forum Naval Warfare
    Replies: 198
    Last Post: 06 Jun 13,, 20:09
  2. Top five Air-defense ships
    By Master Chief in forum Naval Warfare
    Replies: 56
    Last Post: 11 Sep 08,, 06:33
  3. Future Battleship/Capital Ship Discussion
    By Defcon 6 in forum Battleships Board
    Replies: 170
    Last Post: 25 Feb 08,, 20:14
  4. Carrier killers (an article from JED online)
    By lurker in forum Naval Warfare
    Replies: 172
    Last Post: 28 Dec 06,, 04:39

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •