+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 59

Thread: Russian Arms Exports to Greece, Cyprus and Turkey

  1. #16
    Contributor LetsTalk's Avatar
    Join Date
    16 Mar 08
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    718
    Country: United States

  2. #17
    Contributor LetsTalk's Avatar
    Join Date
    16 Mar 08
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    718
    Country: United States
    While I was reading some more on the topic I came across this resent article:

    Cyprus urges Turkey to account for 1,500 missing

    NICOSIA, Cyprus (AP) — Cyprus urged Turkey on Friday to account for some 1,500 people missing since its invasion of the island 35 years ago. The call came after a former Turkish army conscript described how he had executed a prisoner of war.

    Later in the day, however, the conscript retracted his statement, saying it was false.

    Actor Attila Olgac reportedly told a Turkish television program this week that while serving in the Turkish army during the 1974 invasion he shot at least one prisoner dead on orders from a superior.

    "The first person that I killed was a 19-year-old soldier who was taken prisoner," Olgac was quoted as saying on the program, according to the Hurriyet newspaper's web site.

    "When I aimed my gun at his face, he spat on my face. I shot him in the forehead. He died. Later on, I killed nine more people during clashes," Olgac was quoted as saying.

    Turkey invaded and ethnically split Cyprus in response to a coup by Athens-backed supporters of union with Greece.

    In Cyprus on Friday, government spokesman Stefanos Stefanou described the interview as "shocking" and said it was the first time anyone had made such an admission.

    He said Olgac's remarks underscore Turkey's obligation to abide by European Court of Human Rights rulings and cooperate in uncovering the circumstances of the disappearances.

    In Greece, Foreign Ministry spokesman George Koumoutsakos said Olgac's account was "a stunning testimony and confession," and he urged Turkey to take action.

    "Turkey must cooperate to ensure that all the disappearances that took place during the Turkish invasion are fully investigated," Koumoutsakos said.

    But on Friday, Olgac said in a statement that his remarks on Thursday's television program were not true, and that he made them up to attract attention to the brutality of war.

    "My words that 'I killed 10 people including a prisoner' was a scenario," Olgac said in a statement sent to media organizations on Friday, Hurriyet newspaper's web site reported. "I want to inform the public that they had nothing to do with truth."

    Around 1,500 Greek Cypriots and 500 Turkish Cypriots vanished during the invasion and in clashes in the early 1960s.

    A United Nations-sponsored exhumation and identification program has so far unearthed the remains of 466 people from 230 burial sites on both sides of the divide.

    To date, the remains of 110 people have been identified and returned to their families.

    Relatives of missing Greek Cypriots, however, say the U.N. program does not go far enough and have a long-standing demand for a formal investigation to account for the fate of the missing.

    http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/...4BDzAD95T2H180

  3. #18
    Banned Patron
    Join Date
    22 Apr 06
    Posts
    262
    Country: Turkey
    You have to understand there is no interest in Cyprus for enosis with Greece any more. Why would we want to connect a functioning economy and a society that works (not to mention all our new found oil and gas between us and Egypt) with the basketcase that todays Greece is?

    The time for Pan-Hellenism has past, we are more concerned about staying in the EU and becoming even wealthier than we currently are, let the Greeks deal with their own problems
    Pan-Hellenism is ideological movement, not economical. Pan-Hellenism has done via EU at the moment.

    Also, rhetorically here i wonder what would happen if the Cypriot National Guard made a land grab and retook the North in a lightning attack and then sued for peace and called upon the EU to guarantee its territorial integrity. Seeing as international law recognises the Republic of Cyprus as the 'De Jure' government of the entire island it would not be considered and invasion. It would be a double jeapordy of sorts, you cant invade your own country can you?
    Republic of Cyprus was founded with 2 folks and Turkey, Greece, Britian were guarantor countries. Republic of Cyprus that is recognized by UN includes both sides. If southern Cyprus try to do something to north, Turkey use her international right and eliminates Greek Cypriots dream again. Turkish Army is in Island to be deterrent such movements.

    Would Turkey dare defy the EU and re-invade knowing full well that it extends military protection over island. Basically is Cyprus important enough to Turkey to get involved in a European war over?
    EU is indirectly part of the problem. They took divided island and i don't know what they think with doing it. Negotiations to solve the problem goes with UN. EU can not be direct part of it. I don't think European countries dies for Pan-Hellenism. They may give political aid to Greeks but is sounds buzz from here. Turkey and Greece were near to war 5-10 years ago for piece of rock. Yes, Cyprus is important for Turkey.

  4. #19
    Senior Contributor chakos's Avatar
    Join Date
    21 Apr 08
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    1,117
    Country: Australia
    Quote Originally Posted by neyzen View Post
    Pan-Hellenism is ideological movement, not economical. Pan-Hellenism has done via EU at the moment.
    Pan-Hellenism is a dead idealogical movement. Cypriots by and large are simply not interested in enosis with Greece. Once apon a time they did, nowdays its not something that holds much interest to either party.

    Republic of Cyprus was founded with 2 folks and Turkey, Greece, Britian were guarantor countries. Republic of Cyprus that is recognized by UN includes both sides. If southern Cyprus try to do something to north, Turkey use her international right and eliminates Greek Cypriots dream again. Turkish Army is in Island to be deterrent such movements.
    I can only repeat this so many times. There is only one internationally recognised government of the Island and that is that of the Republic of Cyprus. The Island may have 2 'De facto' governments but 'De Jure' there is only one.

    EU is indirectly part of the problem. They took divided island and i don't know what they think with doing it. Negotiations to solve the problem goes with UN. EU can not be direct part of it. I don't think European countries dies for Pan-Hellenism. They may give political aid to Greeks but is sounds buzz from here. Turkey and Greece were near to war 5-10 years ago for piece of rock. Yes, Cyprus is important for Turkey
    EU just followed international law. How can you recognise the North of the island as a seperate entity when legally it does not exist as one. Facts on the ground mean nothing. Northern Cyprus will only ever be part of the EU as part of a unified Cyprus. There will only be a unified Cyprus if the North accepts unification on the terms of the Republic.

    European countries will not fight for Pan-Hellenism, they will fight for the integrity of the EU. For better or worse Cyprus is in, Turkey is not. Greece and Cyprus where actually supporting Turkeys attempt to join because they where of the opinion that with that carrot they could convince Turkey to let go of Cyprus. I personally have always been against Turkey joining the EU. The EU is a rich, European, Christian club. No offence to Turkey but it is none of the above, in my mind it would be better served seeking a leadership role in the Muslim world.

  5. #20
    Banned Patron
    Join Date
    22 Apr 06
    Posts
    262
    Country: Turkey
    Pan-Hellenism is a dead idealogical movement. Cypriots by and large are simply not interested in enosis with Greece. Once apon a time they did, nowdays its not something that holds much interest to either party.
    "Aegea is Greek Sea" , "Cyprus is Greek" these are state policy of Greeks. Like all countries Turkey won't let such expansionist movements that comes from her neighbours. I guess she will use her international rights to eliminate them like she did in 1974 according to Zürich and London Agreement.

    I can only repeat this so many times. There is only one internationally recognised government of the Island and that is that of the Republic of Cyprus. The Island may have 2 'De facto' governments but 'De Jure' there is only one.
    The day Greek Cypriots began to kill innocent Turkish Cypriots for unification with Greece, only one internationally recognised Republic of Cyprus was impeded. The day Greek Cypriots said "no" to UN's plan ROC was impeded again. Today the wind comes from your behind for known reasons. I can't guess future from now but I should say that Cyprus won't be Greek state if Turkey has enough power to eliminate it. I know there is only one internationally recognized ROK. Current negotiation via UN goes for united Cyprus which says Cyprus is not only Greek state.

    EU just followed international law. How can you recognise the North of the island as a seperate entity when legally it does not exist as one. Facts on the ground mean nothing. Northern Cyprus will only ever be part of the EU as part of a unified Cyprus. There will only be a unified Cyprus if the North accepts unification on the terms of the Republic.

    European countries will not fight for Pan-Hellenism, they will fight for the integrity of the EU. For better or worse Cyprus is in, Turkey is not. Greece and Cyprus where actually supporting Turkeys attempt to join because they where of the opinion that with that carrot they could convince Turkey to let go of Cyprus. I personally have always been against Turkey joining the EU. The EU is a rich, European, Christian club. No offence to Turkey but it is none of the above, in my mind it would be better served seeking a leadership role in the Muslim world.
    I believe Greece and Southern Cyprus are easy to deal for main EU member since Greek economy mainly based on EU.

    Geographical, Turkey is more European than Cyprus. For Turks, Turkey is Turkey. She is neither European nor ME nor Caucasian nor Asian nor Mediterranean.... We are combination of many and we are happy with it. Culturally, feel free to compare Scandinavian, Western European,...Turkish cultures with Greek culture and tell us which one is closer. I don't know the EU Christian club thing. It is you and also our prime minister's saying. I know only Copenhagen political criteria, rest is junk for me or should be junk.

    I missed why EU fight with Turkey...? Any way. EU is not Army. Who is going to die for you and why? Brits, French, Germans, Dutchs.. who?

  6. #21
    Contributor Hitman817's Avatar
    Join Date
    20 Oct 08
    Posts
    314
    Country: Turkey
    Quote Originally Posted by chakos View Post
    Time is definatelly on the side of the Republic of Cyprus.

    Noone is going to recognise Northern Cyprus. Its impossible when internationally the Republic of Cyprus is the official government of the entire island.

    Turkey would not dare confront Europe over this as it would destroy any chance of ever joining the EU and also massivelly piss off all its Nato allies.

    Getting into the EU is not a majority vote thing, every member has to vote yes and thats where the problem lays. Cyprus and Greece will veto any attempt for Turkey to join unless it is under their conditions. Turkey has to think about what it wants for the future. To join the EU and gain all the benefits it has to offer or to attempt to hold onto Northern Cyprus, something that is of no real economic benefit in order to satisfy some of the more radical segments of its society.

    At the end of the day this may all be null and mute. The current President of Cyprus is having serious negotiations with the President of Northern Cyprus in order to come to an agreement. The problem for Turkey proper is that the ambitions of the Northern Cypriots and the ambitions of Turkey proper diverge here. Turkey proper would love to hold onto Northern Cyprus but when the Northern Cypriots are making on average $5000 a year compared to $28000 a year on average for members of the Republic of Cyprus then they are willing to accept a deal that would make them a member of a unified Cyprus.

    Even though the deal will be on the terms of the Republic of Cyprus it is actually a good deal for the Northern Cypriots. I admit though it is not as good deal for Turkey proper though.
    As I mantioned, Turkey is never going to join the EU, not because of the Greeks but Germans, French, Austrians .....

    So your argument is baseless.

  7. #22
    Contributor Hitman817's Avatar
    Join Date
    20 Oct 08
    Posts
    314
    Country: Turkey
    Quote Originally Posted by chakos View Post
    Would Turkey dare defy the EU and re-invade knowing full well that it extends military protection over island. Basically is Cyprus important enough to Turkey to get involved in a European war over?
    We are not going to invade Cyprus, for what, Northern Cyprus is allready ours, it just needs to join Turkey or a Union which we migth create later on. But If the Greeks invaded the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus, it would be a grave mistake, we will definitely defend it.
    Last edited by Hitman817; 26 Jan 09, at 22:02.

  8. #23
    Senior Contributor chakos's Avatar
    Join Date
    21 Apr 08
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    1,117
    Country: Australia
    Quote Originally Posted by neyzen View Post
    "Aegea is Greek Sea" , "Cyprus is Greek" these are state policy of Greeks. Like all countries Turkey won't let such expansionist movements that comes from her neighbours. I guess she will use her international rights to eliminate them like she did in 1974 according to Zürich and London Agreement.

    You confuse Greece with Cyprus foreign policy, they are not one and the same. The Republic of Cyprus doesnt want a 'Greek' Cyprus... that would be as unnapealing to us as a 'Turkish' Cyprus. What the aim is is a unified Cyprus but with certain criteria such as compensation for the homes occupied by Turkish settlers in the North and a government split on the basis of the original Greek/Turk split as opposed to the current Greek/Turk split that takes into account over 120000 Turks that have been resettled from the Ankara region.


    The day Greek Cypriots began to kill innocent Turkish Cypriots for unification with Greece, only one internationally recognised Republic of Cyprus was impeded. The day Greek Cypriots said "no" to UN's plan ROC was impeded again. Today the wind comes from your behind for known reasons. I can't guess future from now but I should say that Cyprus won't be Greek state if Turkey has enough power to eliminate it. I know there is only one internationally recognized ROK. Current negotiation via UN goes for united Cyprus which says Cyprus is not only Greek state.
    Lets not get into who killed who... i am purposelly avoiding pulling up the history on this one because both sides caused more than enough atrocities. As for Turkey eliminating anything its not the way things work in international circles. The Republic of Cyprus could effectivelly starve the North economically and legally and Turkey would not dare go against international law and the EU to do something physically.

    I believe Greece and Southern Cyprus are easy to deal for main EU member since Greek economy mainly based on EU.
    The Greek economy is a joke. The Cypriot economy on the other hand is doing exceedingly well and is on fire. The average Cypriot yearly salary of $28000 is higher than that of Greece at $13500, Northern Cyprus at about $5000 and Turkey at $11228

    Geographical, Turkey is more European than Cyprus. For Turks, Turkey is Turkey. She is neither European nor ME nor Caucasian nor Asian nor Mediterranean.... We are combination of many and we are happy with it. Culturally, feel free to compare Scandinavian, Western European,...Turkish cultures with Greek culture and tell us which one is closer. I don't know the EU Christian club thing. It is you and also our prime minister's saying. I know only Copenhagen political criteria, rest is junk for me or should be junk.
    The large majoity of Cypriots are from the Greeek culture... Greek culture is the basis of Western and European culture. Your argument there is laughable. Democracy, modern medicine, mathematics, science, the defence of ancient Europe from the Persians. All Greek products. Where do you get the argument that Turkish culture is more in line with European culture than the Greeks?

    I missed why EU fight with Turkey...? Any way. EU is not Army. Who is going to die for you and why? Brits, French, Germans, Dutchs.. who?
    If an EU country gets attacked by an external country the EU will defend it. The EU is going down the path of a superstate. In the US Texans may not get along with New Yorkers but at the same time if NY got invaded you would expect the Texans to mobilise their national guard just the same. You dont seem to get that if the currentl constitution goes through in the EU the power of Cyprus will rise immensly due to the fact that it will be part of a much larger and more powerfull state. Turkey will not realise just how bad that geopolitical move will come back to bite it in the arse in the future.

    Think of Cyprus in 5-10 years time as a semi-independant state of the country known as the European Union and it will make sense to you why EU would fight to defend its interests.
    Last edited by chakos; 26 Jan 09, at 23:21.

  9. #24
    Banned Patron
    Join Date
    22 Apr 06
    Posts
    262
    Country: Turkey
    Lets not get into who killed who... i am purposelly avoiding pulling up the history on this one because both sides caused more than enough atrocities. As for Turkey eliminating anything its not the way things work in international circles. The Republic of Cyprus could effectivelly starve the North economically and legally and Turkey would not dare go against international law and the EU to do something physically.
    I didn't try to pull up history. I just remind you reason of Turkish Army's existence in the Island. And it has done according to international law (Zürich and London Agreement). Republic of Cyprus was going without such problems if the EOKA wasn't exist. For eliminating... It has already worked. Existence of Turkish Cypriots is the evidence. Actual circumstance of Cyprus looks well for international circles. According to international law Turkey can not occupy Cyprus or she can not split Island into 2 parts for now. You know the Turkish aid to Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus. Turkey don't let Turkish Cypriots to starve. This is what I mean. Problem started with Greek Cypriot terror. Greek Cypriots said no to UN's plan and 35 years has already passed. If current negociations fails again because of South and years passes... when the conjuncture fits international law changes...

    The Greek economy is a joke. The Cypriot economy on the other hand is doing exceedingly well and is on fire. The average Cypriot yearly salary of $28000 is higher than that of Greece at $13500, Northern Cyprus at about $5000 and Turkey at $11228
    No. I mean your economy based on EU. If Turkey's EU membership fits to them there is nothing much to do for Greeks.

    The large majoity of Cypriots are from the Greeek culture... Greek culture is the basis of Western and European culture. Your argument there is laughable. Democracy, modern medicine, mathematics, science, the defence of ancient Europe from the Persians. All Greek products. Where do you get the argument that Turkish culture is more in line with European culture than the Greeks?
    Again misunderstanding.. Sorry, maybe my English cause it. I respect to Ancient Greeks for many things they done. But we don't live in ancient times. And you are not ancient Greeks. I was talking about present cultures. Present Greek culture is more like Turkish culture than British one or Polish one..

    If an EU country gets attacked by an external country the EU will defend it. The EU is going down the path of a superstate. In the US Texans may not get along with New Yorkers but at the same time if NY got invaded you would expect the Texans to mobilise their national guard just the same. You dont seem to get that if the currentl constitution goes through in the EU the power of Cyprus will rise immensly due to the fact that it will be part of a much larger and more powerfull state. Turkey will not realise just how bad that geopolitical move will come back to bite it in the arse in the future.
    I don't think soldiers of any European country except Greece die for you if you pass green line. But I am sure Turkish Army gives the right answer if Greek Cypriots dare it.

    Think of Cyprus in 5-10 years time as a semi-independant state of the country known as the European Union and it will make sense to you why EU would fight to defend its interests.
    Today Turkish State Institute of Statistics announced census of population. We are 71.5 million, half of the population is under 28. We work harder than many EU countries. Economic growth and income for per capita is better than many EU countries in Western Turkey. Turkey's potential is much higher. Crisis around Turkey such as Iraq, Palestine can be end in near future. Our ambit can be more stable in 5-10 years. It benefits us. Energy resources declines. EU getting old. Turkey will be important country with her mix polar culture and geostrategic location for North, East as much as EU. I don't think EU will be US at least in 50 year. I repeat again no one dies for you and actual circumstance of Cyprus is better for European countries.

  10. #25
    Contributor LetsTalk's Avatar
    Join Date
    16 Mar 08
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    718
    Country: United States
    Quote Originally Posted by neyzen View Post
    Republic of Cyprus was founded with 2 folks and Turkey, Greece, Britian were guarantor countries. Republic of Cyprus that is recognized by UN includes both sides. If southern Cyprus try to do something to north, Turkey use her international right and eliminates Greek Cypriots dream again. Turkish Army is in Island to be deterrent such movements.
    Neyzen based to your interesting comments, I have some of my own comments.
    • Cyprus is 78% Greek, 18% Turkish. Isn't Turkey 18%-20% Kurdish. Since Turkey has 2 "folk" I vote for a Northern Turkey (we can call it Kurdish Turkey, or Kurdistan). Isn't this what Turkey has done?
    • When Turkey invaded Cyprus the tiny nation of about 750,000 people, to offer protection to the Turkish 18% (135,000) of the population that owned about 10% of the land by occupying 37% of the Island. The result was:
      1. 180,000-200,000 Greek Cypriot and 45,000 Turkish Cypriot refugees
      2. 1,500 Greek Cypriot and 500 Turkish Cypriot missing
      3. Plenty dead and injured on both sides
      4. Both parties committed atrocities.
      5. Turkey has settled the Island with 120,000 Turks from Turkey (a UN violation, I no no-one seems to care about UN violations), while many of the original Turkish Cypriots have emigrated out of the Turkish occupied section.
      6. Strained relations between Turkey and Greece

  11. #26
    Contributor LetsTalk's Avatar
    Join Date
    16 Mar 08
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    718
    Country: United States
    Quote Originally Posted by chakos View Post
    Greece and Cyprus where actually supporting Turkeys attempt to join because they where of the opinion that with that carrot they could convince Turkey to let go of Cyprus.
    I believe that Greece would also benefit from a well to do country they can trade with. I believe they have invested money in Turkey, their return will increase if Turkey joins the EU. Also Greece would like to solve their own issues with Turkey, not just Cyprus.


    Quote Originally Posted by chakos View Post
    I personally have always been against Turkey joining the EU. The EU is a rich, European, Christian club. No offence to Turkey but it is none of the above, in my mind it would be better served seeking a leadership role in the Muslim world.
    Religion should have nothing to with it. I thinks of larger concern is some of their undemocratic tendencies (Turkey holds 30 over 'coup plot'), minority treatments, freedom of speech, their not so good relations with at least 2 current members....

  12. #27
    Senior Contributor chakos's Avatar
    Join Date
    21 Apr 08
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    1,117
    Country: Australia
    Quote Originally Posted by LetsTalk View Post
    I believe that Greece would also benefit from a well to do country they can trade with. I believe they have invested money in Turkey, their return will increase if Turkey joins the EU. Also Greece would like to solve their own issues with Turkey, not just Cyprus.
    The three major issues that Greece will always have with Turkey are as follows in order of most to least importance.

    *The Agean Sea
    *Constantinople/Istanbul
    *Cyprus

    Cyprus is the simplest to resolve, im afraid the other 2 will have to wait till if and when the two countries come to blows again. Greeks will always see the Agean as a Greek pond and will always see Constantinople/Istanbul as their stolen capital. Realisitically i cant see either side giving an inch on either.

    Religion should have nothing to with it. I thinks of larger concern is some of their undemocratic tendencies (Turkey holds 30 over 'coup plot'), minority treatments, freedom of speech, their not so good relations with at least 2 current members....
    In a perfect world it shouldnt but it does. Europe still has that ingrained fear of the Muslims in the South. Since the middle ages nothing has changed, if its not the Turks of today its the Ottomans of yesteryear and the Moors and Egyptians before that. Its an ingrained fear that may not be fashionable to talk about nowdays but has been bred into the collective psyche of Europe.

  13. #28
    Contributor LetsTalk's Avatar
    Join Date
    16 Mar 08
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    718
    Country: United States
    Quote Originally Posted by chakos View Post
    The three major issues that Greece will always have with Turkey are as follows in order of most to least importance.
    *The Agean Sea
    *Constantinople/Istanbul
    *Cyprus
    Constantinople is not an issue for Greeks living in Greece. Maybe for Greek-Australians

    Quote Originally Posted by chakos View Post
    The Greek economy is a joke. The Cypriot economy on the other hand is doing exceedingly well and is on fire. The average Cypriot yearly salary of $28000 is higher than that of Greece at $13500, Northern Cyprus at about $5000 and Turkey at $11228
    You can more accurate figures here.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...PP)_per_capita

  14. #29
    Contributor LetsTalk's Avatar
    Join Date
    16 Mar 08
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    718
    Country: United States
    Quote Originally Posted by neyzen View Post
    "Aegea is Greek Sea" , "Cyprus is Greek" these are state policy of Greeks. Like all countries Turkey won't let such expansionist movements that comes from her neighbours. I guess she will use her international rights to eliminate them like she did in 1974 according to Zürich and London Agreement.
    From WIKIPEDIA:
    "The territorial waters

    Territorial waters give the littoral state full control over air navigation in the airspace above, and partial control over shipping, although foreign ships (both civil and military) are normally guaranteed innocent passage through them. The standard width of territorial waters that countries are customarily entitled to has steadily increased in the course of the 20th century: from initially 3 nautical miles at the beginning of the century, to 6 miles, and currently 12 miles (c.22 km). The 12-mile value has been enshrined in treaty law by the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 1982 (Art.3). In the Aegean the territorial waters claimed by both sides are still at 6 miles. The possibility of an extension to 12 miles has fuelled Turkish concerns over a possible disproportionate increase in Greek-controlled space. Turkey has refused to become a member of the convention and does not consider itself bound by it, although it has applied the customary 12 miles on its other coastlines outside the Aegean. Turkey considers the convention as res inter alios acta, i.e. a treaty that can only be binding to the signing parties but not to others. Greece, which is a party to the convention, has stated that it reserves the right to apply this rule and extend its waters to 12 miles at some point in the future, although it has never actually attempted to do so. It holds that the 12-mile rule is not only treaty law but also customary law at the same time, as per the wide consensus established among the international community. Against this, Turkey argues that the special geographical properties of the Aegean Sea make a strict application of the 12-mile rule in this case illicit in the interest of equity.[2] Furthermore, Turkey argues that although according to the convention the islands are considered as land and have their territorial waters, the third paragraph of Article 121 states that "Rocks which cannot sustain human habitation or economic life of their own shall have no exclusive economic zone or continental shelf.". Turkey also claims that the attempts of Greece to extend their territorial waters to 12 miles violates Article 300 of the agreement as well, which mentions that "States Parties shall fulfil in good faith the obligations assumed under this Convention and shall exercise the rights, jurisdiction and freedoms recognized in this Convention in a manner which would not constitute an abuse of right.".[3]

    Tensions over the 12-mile question ran highest between the two countries in the early 1990s, when the Law of the Sea was going to come into force. On 9 June 1995, the Turkish parliament officially declared that unilateral action by Greece would constitute a casus belli, i.e. reason to go to war, by Turkey. This declaration has been condemned by Greece as a violation of the Charter of the United Nations, which forbids "the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state".[1]"


    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aegean_dispute


    Quote Originally Posted by neyzen View Post
    The day Greek Cypriots began to kill innocent Turkish Cypriots for unification with Greece, only one internationally recognised Republic of Cyprus was impeded.
    Please read some of my prior links, your arguments are completely one sided here.

  15. #30
    Contributor LetsTalk's Avatar
    Join Date
    16 Mar 08
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    718
    Country: United States
    Quote Originally Posted by neyzen View Post
    I don't think soldiers of any European country except Greece die for you if you pass green line.
    Completely agree.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. future Turkish war scenarios
    By Gazi in forum Europe and Russia
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 15 Dec 07,, 01:08
  2. Turkey threatens Greece with war
    By JG73 in forum Europe and Russia
    Replies: 131
    Last Post: 01 Oct 07,, 01:33
  3. Declaration from Turkish General Staff against anti-secularists
    By Big K in forum International Politics
    Replies: 47
    Last Post: 02 May 07,, 12:29
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 25 Jan 06,, 15:39
  5. Turkey and EU: rough road ahead
    By Ray in forum Europe and Russia
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11 Oct 05,, 21:14

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts