+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Georgian NATO membership

  1. #1
    Former Staff Senior Contributor Ironduke's Avatar
    Join Date
    02 Aug 03
    Location
    Arlington, Virginia
    Posts
    10,132
    Country: United States

    Georgian NATO membership

    Russia alarmed by prospect of Georgia's NATO membership

    23/04/2007 18:46 MOSCOW, April 23 (RIA Novosti) - Russia fears that Georgia's NATO membership will seriously worsen relations between Moscow and Tbilisi, a senior Foreign Ministry official said Monday.

    As well as being uneasy about the opening of NATO bases on the territory of Russia's former Soviet allies in the Baltic region and Central Asia, Moscow strongly opposes efforts by Georgia and Ukraine to join the alliance, saying the prospect threatens its security and will unleash a new arms race.

    "I like the idea of Georgian neutrality, but such decisions should be made by the Georgian people, Georgian voters, and the country's leadership. No one should dictate to a sovereign state how it should develop," Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Grigory Karasin told a news conference at RIA Novosti.

    He said Russia is worried by the prospect of NATO air bases being deployed on Georgian soil.

    "We are particularly concerned by the possibility of our immediate neighbors becoming a bridgehead for the deployment of strategic elements of a military machine," he said, adding that Moscow expects all neighboring states to follow a responsible approach toward such matters.

    Karasin's statement seems to have come in response to remarks by the president of the NATO Parliamentary Assembly (PA), who said that Georgia's stability and strength is in Russia's interests.

    Jose Lello said Georgia's cooperation with the North Atlantic alliance focuses on fighting terrorism, exactly the threats and challenges that Russia is facing in the North Caucasus.

    He said stability in Georgia will benefit Russia, among others, and that it is high time for constructive dialogue.

    A NATO PA delegation visited Tbilisi April 19-21.

    Georgia will be ready to start a NATO membership program in the fall of 2007, President Mikheil Saakashvili said Thursday.

    "Georgia will be ready to move up to a higher level later this year, and we expect to receive the status of an official NATO candidate in the next few months," Saakashvili said.

    Georgian Parliament Speaker Nino Burdzhanadze said the country was strengthening its military to comply with NATO standards, not to solve military conflicts.

    "Some politicians and Russian government officials believe the unresolved conflicts in Georgia will be an insurmountable obstacle to joining NATO," she said. "Our opponents and neighbors have issued insinuating and provocative statements alleging that Georgia is preparing for war and spending large sums on the military."

    On April 10, U.S. President George Bush signed into law legislation supporting a Ukrainian and Georgian bid to join NATO.

    The NATO Freedom Consolidation Act of 2007, already approved by the Senate March 15 and the House of Representatives March 26, envisions $12 million in aid to Albania, Croatia, Macedonia, Georgia and Ukraine in 2008, which "have clearly stated their desire to join NATO and are working hard to meet the specified requirements for membership."

    A total of $30 million will be allocated from the U.S. budget to the countries between 2008 and 2012 under the same program.

    Georgia has pushed to join the Cold War-era organization since Western-educated President Mikheil Saakashvili came to power on the back of mass protests in 2003, hoping that membership will help it regain control of breakaway regions of Abkhazia and South Ossetia that Tbilisi believes are backed by Russia.

    Russia helped to end the bloody conflicts in the region in the early 1990s and has maintained troops there ever since.

    In mid-March, despite bitter differences on domestic issues, Georgia's parliament voted unanimously to carry on with the NATO bid.

    "NATO is a priority for all Georgian people," Nino Burdzhanadze, the speaker, said. "Hope of restoring territorial integrity and protecting the country's sovereignty are pinned on this organization. The organization is the only guarantor of stability and peace in the region."

    A U.S. diplomat denied rumors that the United States has been conducting talks on the possible placement of a U.S. missile shield in the South Caucasus.

    Air Force Lt. Gen. Henry Obering III, director of the U.S. missile defense program, said March 1 that the U.S. would like to place elements of its missile defense system in the South Caucasus, but did not specify which of the three former Soviet countries it would choose - Armenia, Azerbaijan or Georgia, with the latter being anxious to join NATO.

    The statement echoed U.S. plans revealed in January to deploy elements of its missile defense system in the Czech Republic and Poland as a counter to possible attacks from Iran or North Korea, whose nuclear programs have provoked serious international concerns.

    Moscow said it will have to develop an adequate response to the possible missile shield deployment in the Caucasus.
    Source: RIA Novosti

  2. #2
    Ray
    Ray is offline
    Military Professional Ray's Avatar
    Join Date
    20 Aug 03
    Posts
    19,528
    Country: India
    The only way to keep Georgia, which has divisive tendencies, firmly within the US - EU sphere of influence is to give it NATO status so that Ossetia cannot enforce its desire to split from Georgia.

    The first attempt of Ossetia towards independence came in 1918 but the fractious tendencies disappeared once it became a part of USSR.

    Unless Georgians give the Ossentians equality in all spheres, the problem will continue.

    However, with NATO membership and thereafter flushing Georgia with funds and improving the standard of living there is a good chance that Ossetia drops its demand for an independent identity.

    However, it may not be correct to presume that Russia will sit idle and watch its influence in Ossetial fade.

    It sure to grow as another flashpoint!

    Welcome to Alice in Wonderland!


    "Some have learnt many Tricks of sly Evasion, Instead of Truth they use Equivocation, And eke it out with mental Reservation, Which is to good Men an Abomination."

    I don't have to attend every argument I'm invited to.

    HAKUNA MATATA

  3. #3
    Registered User
    Join Date
    06 Apr 07
    Posts
    1,596
    Quote Originally Posted by Ray View Post
    The only way to keep Georgia, which has divisive tendencies, firmly within the US - EU sphere of influence is to give it NATO status so that Ossetia cannot enforce its desire to split from Georgia.

    The first attempt of Ossetia towards independence came in 1918 but the fractious tendencies disappeared once it became a part of USSR.

    Unless Georgians give the Ossentians equality in all spheres, the problem will continue.

    However, with NATO membership and thereafter flushing Georgia with funds and improving the standard of living there is a good chance that Ossetia drops its demand for an independent identity.

    However, it may not be correct to presume that Russia will sit idle and watch its influence in Ossetial fade.

    It sure to grow as another flashpoint!

    Welcome to Alice in Wonderland!

    I agree but it's better to have Georgia as a US ally lest it fall back into Russia's fold. If Russia wants to make Georgian membership an issue, well we can see how far they are willing to go...

  4. #4
    Senior Contributor xrough's Avatar
    Join Date
    09 Jan 07
    Location
    Manila
    Posts
    1,295
    Country: Philippines
    That would be a tough decision to be made by Georgia and I would agree that with NATO membership it could give assurances on the matter of security for their people..

  5. #5
    Defense Professional
    Join Date
    18 Jun 04
    Posts
    1,632
    Quote Originally Posted by Herodotus View Post
    I agree but it's better to have Georgia as a US ally lest it fall back into Russia's fold. If Russia wants to make Georgian membership an issue, well we can see how far they are willing to go...
    Well. that is fine with Georgian interests.... but why so many of NATO countries must risk everytime a cocky Georgian president starts his little war with rebelling regions risking war with Russia.....

    You can not control Georgians... and having a member who DOES NOT coordinate his policy may cause only troubles. and FOR WHAT?

    ps. Remember how much troubles EU has wiht Poland...

+ Reply to Thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Turkey turning cool to NATO
    By Ray in forum The Field Mess
    Replies: 59
    Last Post: 14 Sep 08,, 12:26
  2. Baku - NATO Membership?
    By Ironduke in forum Europe and Russia
    Replies: 64
    Last Post: 26 Aug 08,, 08:21
  3. The Causes & Consequences of Strategic Failure in Afghanistan & Iraq
    By lulldapull in forum The Middle East and North Africa
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 20 May 08,, 08:48
  4. For global security increase the NATO
    By Ray in forum Europe and Russia
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 13 Oct 06,, 18:26
  5. Project Afghanistan: Pakistan and NATO
    By Ray in forum Operation Enduring Freedom and Af-Pak
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 21 May 06,, 23:08

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts