View Poll Results: In a war, no nukes, who would win?

Voters
80. You may not vote on this poll
  • UK

    58 72.50%
  • France

    20 25.00%
  • Roman Empire

    0 0%
  • Byzantine Empire

    0 0%
  • Holy Roman Empire

    0 0%
  • British Empire

    0 0%
  • French Empire

    0 0%
  • Russian Empire

    0 0%
  • Spanish Empire

    0 0%
  • Yes

    0 0%
  • No

    0 0%
  • Lingrie Babes

    0 0%
  • Lingerie Babe

    1 1.25%
  • Skimpy Swimsuit Babes

    0 0%
  • Pink Bikini Babe

    0 0%
  • Old Glory Bikini Babe

    0 0%
  • 10 posts-USA

    0 0%
  • 5 posts-Israel

    0 0%
  • 5 posts-USA

    0 0%
  • 10 posts-Israel

    0 0%
  • 15 posts-USA

    0 0%
  • 15 posts-Israel

    0 0%
  • 20 posts-USA

    0 0%
  • Frankreich

    1 1.25%
  • John Bull

    0 0%
Page 9 of 15 FirstFirst 123456789101112131415 LastLast
Results 121 to 135 of 225

Thread: France vs the UK

  1. #121
    Ray
    Ray is offline
    Military Professional Ray's Avatar
    Join Date
    20 Aug 03
    Posts
    19,624
    These replies are just a wish list.

    An actual military comparison with strategic inputs would be a better way to approach the subject.

    As the British Armed Forces are no pushovers, neither are the French.

  2. #122
    Ray
    Ray is offline
    Military Professional Ray's Avatar
    Join Date
    20 Aug 03
    Posts
    19,624
    People dont appreciate just how major parties still feel about the commonwealth and the links and bonds that still stand .. Consider the WHOLE commonwealth as a example for each of the countries it influences .. and the add the rest of them .. Pretty impressive eh?
    Are you sure the Commonwealth will back the UK? Remember the Falklands?

    And no they would not be a match for a combined power of the U.S and U.K forces .. They would quake themselves .. Giving the point likely most of the Russian army wouldnt fight ... especially when they couldnt win ... 85% of European armies are trained by Americans anyway
    When will you learn to fight your own battles? Must you always bank on Big Brother? Even if the US trained and equipped all, what makes you think that they will support the war between UK and France, which anyway will never happen.

  3. #123
    Ray
    Ray is offline
    Military Professional Ray's Avatar
    Join Date
    20 Aug 03
    Posts
    19,624
    French and British forces, 2000



    By Robert S. Norris and William M. Arkin
    September/October 2000 pp. 69-71 (vol. 56, no. 05) © 2000 Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists

    France

    On February 22 and 23, 1996, President Jacques Chirac announced several reforms of the armed forces to be undertaken between 1997 and 2002. Chirac's decisions in the nuclear area combined the withdrawal of several obsolete systems with a commitment to modernize those that remained.

    In February 1996, Chirac announced that the S3D intermediate-range missile would be retired without replacement. On September 16, 1996, all 18 missiles on the Plateau d'Albion were deactivated. Two years and $77.5 million later, the silos and complex were fully dismantled.

    The Pacific test facilities at Mururoa and Fangataufa have also been dismantled. France ceased producing weapons plutonium in 1992 and highly enriched uranium in 1996. In 1998, it began to dismantle the Marcoule reprocessing plant and the Pierrelatte enrichment facility.

    Bombers. In July 1996, after 32 years of service, the Mirage IVP relinquished its nuclear role. Five Mirage IVPs were retained for reconnaissance missions; they belong to the 1/91 "Gascogne" squadron at Mont-de-Marsan. The remaining IVPs were put into storage at Chateaudun.

    Three squadrons of Mirage 2000N have now assumed a "strategic" role in addition to their "pre-strategic" one. A fourth Mirage 2000N squadron at Nancy--now conventional--is scheduled to be replaced by Mirage 2000Ds. The squadron may be modified to carry the Air-Sol-Moyenne Porté (ASMP) supersonic missile, with the aircraft distributed to the three 2000N squadrons at Luxeuil and Istres, along with 18 ASMP missiles once deployed with Mirage IVPs. We estimate that nearly 100 ASMP missiles were built, and 80 warheads produced for them. In his February 1996 speech, Chirac said that France would develop a longer-range ASMP, sometimes called the "ASMP Plus" (with a 500-rather than 300-kilometer range). It is expected to enter service in about 10 years.

    The Rafale will be France's multi-purpose navy and air force fighter/ bomber for the twenty-first century. Its roles include conventional ground attack, air defense, air superiority, and nuclear delivery of the ASMP and/or ASMP Plus. The carrier-based navy version will be introduced first, with the air force Rafale D acquiring a nuclear strike role, possibly by 2005. The air force still plans to buy a total of 234 Rafales.

    France currently has only one aircraft carrier in service, the Foch, which was commissioned in 1963. The Clemenceau, which entered service in 1961, was decommissioned in 1997. Both were modified to handle the AN 52 nuclear gravity bomb with Super Etendard aircraft. The Clemenceau was modified in 1979 and the Foch in 1981. The AN 52 was retired in July 1991. Only the Foch was modified to "handle and store" the replacement ASMP, approximately 20 of which were allocated for two squadrons (about 24) Super Etendard aircraft.

    The Charles de Gaulle aircraft carrier was launched on May 15, 1994, but various problems encountered during sea trials have delayed its commissioning until October 2000, almost four years behind schedule. At that time, the Foch will be laid up. The de Gaulle will have a single squadron of Super Etendard (with presumably about 10 ASMPs) until the Rafale M is introduced in 2002. The navy is reportedly asking for a second ship, tentatively named the Richelieu. The navy plans to purchase a total of 60 Rafale M, the first 16 of which will perform an air-to-air role. Missions for subsequent planes may include the ASMP and/or ASMP Plus.

    Nuclear-powered ballistic missiles submarines (SSBNs). The lead submarine, Le Triomphant, was rolled out from its construction shed in Cherbourg on July 13, 1993. It entered service in September 1996, armed with the M45 sea-launched ballistic missile and new TN 75 warheads. The second SSBN, Le Téméraire, entered service in 1999. The schedule for the third, Le Vigilant, has slipped, and it will not be ready until at least 2001. Chirac announced on February 23, 1996, that a fourth submarine would be built and that a new submarine-launched ballistic missile (SLBM), known as the M51, will replace the M45. The service date for the fourth sub is approximately 2005. The entry-into-date for the SLBM is 2010.

    We estimate that eventually there will be 288 warheads--because only enough missiles and warheads will be purchased to fully stock three of the four Triomphant-class subs. Less than full loading is the case today, with five submarines in the fleet and only four sets of M4 SLBMs.

    Under a reorganization plan, the navy will base its SSBNs (formerly at Ile-Longue) and SSNs (formerly at Toulon) at Brest. The navy will shut down its SSBN command installations at Houilles (Yvelines) and transfer their activities to Brest. The submarine communication infrastructure will remain at Rosnay (Indre).

    The French defense ministry released a report in 1999 detailing cost figures for its submarine program. The total acquisition cost is estimated to be approximately 45 billion francs ($9 billion), not including the cost of the nuclear warheads. The report also estimated that it will cost 100 billion francs ($20 billion) to maintain the weapons in service for 30 years.


    Britain

    In July 1998, Britain's Labour government announced several decisions resulting from its Strategic Defence Review:

    • Only one British submarine will patrol at any given time, and that boat will carry a reduced load of 48 warheads, half the number the Conservative government had previously planned.

    • The submarine will patrol at a reduced state of alert, its missiles de-targeted. It will be capable of firing its missiles within days, not minutes as during the Cold War. It will also carry out a range of secondary tasks.

    • Britain will maintain fewer than 200 operationally available warheads. This is a one-third reduction from the Conservative government's plan.

    • Britain will purchase a total of 58 rather than 65 Trident D-5 missiles.

    When these decisions are fully implemented, the total explosive power of Britain's operationally available weapons will have been reduced by more than 70 percent since the end of the Cold War. The explosive power of each Trident submarine will be one-third less than that of the Chevaline-armed Polaris submarines of recent years.

    The Atomic Weapons Establishment is now managed by an industrial consortium consisting of Lockheed Martin, Serco Limited, and British Nuclear Fuels, which took over on April 1, 2000, under a 10-year, 2.2-billion-pound contract. On April 1, 1999, the Chief of Defence Logistics assumed overall responsibility for the routine movement of nuclear weapons within the United Kingdom. Day-to-day duties are gradually being transferred from RAF personnel to the Ministry of Defence Police, with support from AWE civilians and the Royal Marines. The process will be completed by March 31, 2002.

    Until recently, the Royal Air Force operated eight squadrons of dual-capable Tornado GR.1/1A aircraft. But with the withdrawal of the last remaining WE177 bombs at the end of March 1998, the Tornadoes' nuclear role was terminated, bringing to an end the four-decade-long history of RAF aircraft carrying nuclear weapons. By the end of August 1998, the remaining WE177 bombs had been dismantled. The RAF base at Bruggen, Germany, is scheduled to be closed, and by the end of 2001 approximately 40 Tornadoes now at the base will be reassigned to bases at Lossiemouth, Scotland, and Marham, England.

    Britain built and deployed four Resolution-class SSBNs, commonly called Polaris submarines after the missiles they carried. The first, the Resolution, went on patrol in mid-June 1968, and the last--the Revenge--in September 1970. The four boats conducted a total of 229 patrols over a 28-year period. The Revenge was retired on May 25, 1992, after 56 patrols. The Resolution was decommissioned on October 22, 1994, after 61 patrols. The Renown was decommissioned on February 24, 1996, after 52 patrols, and the Repulse was withdrawn from service on August 28, 1996, after 60 patrols. Presumably, the Chevaline warheads they carried have been dismantled.

    The first submarine of Britain's new class, the Vanguard, began its initial patrol in December 1994. The second, the Victorious, entered service in December 1995. The third, the Vigilant, was launched in October 1995 and entered service in the fall of 1998. The fourth and final boat of the class, the Vengeance, was launched on September 19, 1998, and was commissioned on November 27, 1999, at the Marconi-Marine Shipyard in Barrow-in-Furness. It will enter service as part of the First Submarine Squadron, and go on patrol in late 2000 or early 2001. The submarine has a total complement of 205 men, which includes a ship's company of about 130. The current estimated cost of the program is $18.8 billion.

    Each Vanguard-class SSBN carries 16 U.S.-produced Trident II D-5 SLBMs. Technically, there are no specifically American or British Trident IIs. A pool of SLBMs are kept at the Strategic Weapons Facility Atlantic at the Kings Bay Submarine Base in Georgia. Britain has title to 58, but does not actually own them. A missile that is deployed on a U.S. SSBN may at a later date deploy on a British boat, or vice versa.

    How many warheads will there be in the future British stockpile? Several factors go into the calculation. We assume that Britain will produce enough warheads for only three boatloads of missiles, a practice it followed with Polaris. As was stated in the Strategic Defence Review, there will be "fewer than 200 operationally available warheads." If all four boats were fully loaded (MIRVed with three warheads) that would total 192. But the purchase of only 58 missiles means there will not be a full complement of missiles for all four boats. The government also stated that normally only one SSBN will be on patrol, with the other three in various states of readiness.

    A further consideration is the "substrategic" mission. A Ministry of Defence official described a substrategic strike as "the limited and highly selective use of nuclear weapons in a manner that fell demonstrably short of a strategic strike, but with a sufficient level of violence to convince an aggressor who had already miscalculated our resolve and attacked us that he should halt his aggression and withdraw or face the prospect of a devastating strategic strike."

    This substrategic mission began with Victorious and "will become fully robust when Vigilant enters service," according to the Ministry of Defence's 1996 White Paper. If this has remained the policy, then some Trident II SLBMs already have a single warhead and are assigned targets once covered by WE177 gravity bombs. For example, when the Vigilant is on patrol, 10, 12, or 14 of its SLBMs may carry up to three warheads per missile, but the other two, four, or six missiles may be armed with just one warhead. There is also some flexibility in the choice of yield of the Trident warhead. (Choosing to detonate the unboosted primary only could produce a yield of a few kilotons.) With dual missions, an SSBN would have approximately 36--44 warheads on board during patrol.

    We estimate that the future British stockpile for the SSBN fleet will be around 160 warheads. With an additional 15 percent for spares, we estimate the total British stockpile to be approximately 185 warheads. At any given time, the sole SSBN on patrol might carry about 40 warheads. The second and third SSBNs could put to sea fairly rapidly with a similar loading, while the fourth might take longer due to the cycle of overhaul and maintenance.

    Ten nuclear-powered attack submarines of the Trafalgar-class and the Swiftsure-class are scheduled to receive upgrades to carry U.S. Tomahawk cruise missiles by 2008. The first submarine to be upgraded, the Splendid, fired Tomahawk missiles during Operation Allied Force. The upgrade of a second submarine, the Triumph, was completed by the end of 1999.

  4. #124
    Ray
    Ray is offline
    Military Professional Ray's Avatar
    Join Date
    20 Aug 03
    Posts
    19,624
    French and British nuclear forces, 1999



    By Robert S. Norris and William M. Arkin
    July/August 1999 pp. 77-79 (vol. 55, no. 04) © 1999 Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists

    France

    We estimate that the French operational stockpile, which peaked at almost 550 warheads in 1991-92, now consists of approximately 450 warheads of three types. It is likely to remain at this level for the foreseeable future.

    The TN 75 warhead. The TN 75 program began in 1987 and new TN 75 warheads are being produced at the Centre d'Etudes de Valduc (the Pantex of France) near Is-sur-Tille, 25 miles north of Dijon. The TN 75 is a miniaturized, hardened thermonuclear warhead, lighter than the TN 71. It uses a new coating material and has a precisely computed shape which gives it better penetration capability during reentry.

    The TN 75 was tested a number of times before July 1991, but President Jacques Chirac announced in June 1995 that the warhead needed a final certification test, one of the reasons he gave for resuming testing. (The French conducted six nuclear tests between September 5, 1995 and January 27, 1996, at their test site in the South Pacific. Then, on September 24, 1996, France signed the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, which it ratified on April 6, 1998.) It is likely that the October 1, 1995 test at Fangataufa, with a reported yield of 110 kilotons, was a full-scale test of the TN 75. Series production at Valduc probably began soon after, and will continue for the next five years or so.

    Valduc dismantles warheads as well as assembles them. One-megaton TN 61 warheads from retired French intermediate-range ballistic missiles and TN 90 warheads from the Hadès short-range ballistic missile have probably been disassembled there.

    Key decisions. On February 22 and 23, 1996, President Chirac announced several dramatic reforms of the French armed forces. The most significant was the phasing out of conscription and the introduction of professional armed forces over a six-year period that concludes in 2001. France also planned to decrease military manpower from almost 400,000 to 260,500.

    Chirac's decisions in the nuclear area combined the withdrawal of several obsolete systems with a commitment to modernize those that remained. Many programs announced in the early 1980s would have increased the size of the French stockpile, but they have now been canceled, modified, or scaled back for budgetary and geopolitical reasons. Most significantly, in May 1992, France announced that the number of its new Triomphant-class ballistic missile submarines (SSBNs) would be reduced from six to four. There had been speculation that Chirac might not purchase a fourth boat, but he reaffirmed that he would, and he also stated that a new submarine-launched ballistic missile (SLBM), the M51, would replace the M45 in the 2010-15 time period.

    Le Triomphant. The lead submarine, Le Triomphant, was rolled out from its construction shed in Cherbourg on July 13, 1993. It entered service in September 1996, armed with M45 SLBMs and new TN 75 warheads. The second SSBN, Le Téméraire, is scheduled to enter service in mid-1999. The schedule for the third, Le Vigilant, has slipped; it will not be ready until 2001. The service date of the fourth submarine is approximately 2005.

    In actual practice, not every missile on an SSBN will be fully MIRVed. Fewer warheads are sometimes carried to increase range to the more distant targets specified in the war plan. About 300-325 TN 75 warheads will be produced for the future four-SSBN fleet. Three older SSBNs--Le Tonnant, L'Indomitable, and L'Inflexible--will be phased out as the new SSBNs are introduced.

    During President François Mitterrand's tenure there were numerous plans to replace France's silo-based S3D intermediate-range missile. But Chirac announced in February 1996 that the missile would be retired without replacement. On September 16, 1996, all 18 missiles on the Plateau d'Albion were deactivated, and the silos and complex have since been dismantled.

    Mirage 2000N. In 1989, the number of Mirage 2000Ns committed to nuclear missions was scaled back from 75 aircraft in five squadrons to 45 in three squadrons. On September 11, 1991, President Mitterrand announced that as of September 1, the AN 52 gravity bomb once carried by Mirage IIIEs, Jaguar As, and Super Etendards, had been withdrawn from service. From that point on France no longer had a nuclear gravity bomb. The Air-Sol-Moyenne Portée (ASMP) supersonic missile was deployed in 1988. Today there are 45 ASMPs with two Mirage 2000N squadrons at Luxeuil and one at Istres.

    The three squadrons of Mirage 2000Ns have now assumed a "strategic" role in addition to their "pre-strategic" one. A fourth Mirage 2000N squadron at Nancy--now conventional--is scheduled to be replaced with Mirage 2000Ds. Those aircraft may be modified to carry the ASMP and distributed to the three 2000N squadrons at Luxeuil and Istres, along with 18 ASMP missiles once deployed with Mirage IVPs. Nearly 100 ASMP missiles were built, and approximately 80 warheads were produced for those missiles. In his February 1996 speech, Chirac said that France would develop a longer-range ASMP, sometimes called the "ASMP plus" (with a 500-kilometer v. 300-kilometer range), for service entry in about a decade.

    France has chosen the Rafale D as its multi-purpose navy and air force fighter/bomber for the twenty-first century. Its roles include conventional ground attack, air defense, air superiority, and nuclear delivery of the ASMP and/or ASMP plus. The navy's carrier-based version will be introduced first, with the air force's Rafale D attaining a nuclear-strike role in approximately 2005. The air force plans to buy a total of 234 Rafales.

    France built two aircraft carriers in the 1950s and 1960s. The Clemenceau entered service in 1961, the Foch in 1963. Both were later modified to handle the AN 52 nuclear gravity bomb with Super Etendard aircraft. After the AN 52 was retired in July 1991, only the Foch was modified to "handle and store" the replacement ASMP. Some 20 ASMPs were allocated for two squadrons (approximately 24) of Super Etendard aircraft. The Clemenceau was never modified for the ASMP, and the 32,780-ton aircraft carrier was decommissioned in September 1997.

    A new 40,600-ton aircraft carrier, the Charles de Gaulle, is scheduled to enter service in December 2000, four years behind schedule and at a cost of well over $3 billion. At that time the Foch will be laid up and decommissioned. The de Gaulle will have a single squadron of Super Etendards (presumably with about 10 ASMPs). There have been reports that the Super Etendard has been used in Operation Allied Force in Yugoslavia.

    The French Navy will take delivery of nine Rafale Ms between the fall of 2000 and February 2002 for deployment on the Charles de Gaulle. A second carrier may be ordered at about that time. The navy plans to purchase a total of 60 Rafale Ms. The first 16 will perform an air-to-air role; later planes may carry the ASMP and/or ASMP plus.


    Britain

    In July 1998, Britain's Labour government announced several decisions resulting from its Strategic Defence Review:

    • Only one British submarine will patrol at any given time, and that boat will carry a reduced load of 48 warheads, half the number the Conservative government had previously planned.

    • The submarine will patrol at a reduced state of alert, its missiles de-targeted. It will be capable of firing its missiles within days, not minutes, as during the Cold War. It will also carry out a range of secondary tasks.

    • Britain will maintain fewer than 200 operationally available warheads. This is a one-third reduction from the Conservative government's plan.

    • Britain will purchase a total of 58 rather than 65 Trident D-5 missiles.

    When these decisions are fully implemented, the total explosive power of Britain's operationally available weapons will have been reduced by more than 70 percent since the end of the Cold War. The explosive power of each Trident submarine will be one-third less than that of the Chevaline-armed Polaris submarines of recent years.

    Until recently, the Royal Air Force operated eight squadrons of dual-capable Tornado GR.1/1A aircraft. But with the withdrawal of the last remaining WE177 bombs at the end of March 1998, the Tornadoes' nuclear role was terminated, bringing to an end the four-decade-long history of RAF aircraft carrying nuclear weapons. By the end of August 1998, the remaining WE177 bombs had been dismantled. The RAF base at Bruggen, Germany, is scheduled to be closed, and by the end of 2001 approximately 40 Tornadoes now at the base will be reassigned to bases at Lossiemouth, Scotland, and Marham, England.

    Britain built and deployed four Resolution-class SSBNs, commonly called Polaris submarines after the missiles they carried. The first, the HMS Resolution, went on patrol in mid-June 1968, and the last--the Revenge--in September 1970. The four boats conducted a total of 229 patrols over a 28-year period.

    The Revenge was retired on May 25, 1992, after 56 patrols. The Resolution was decommissioned on October 22, 1994, after 61 patrols. The Renown was decommissioned on February 24, 1996, after 52 patrols, and the Repulse was withdrawn from service on August 28, 1996, after 60 patrols. The Chevaline warheads they carried have been dismantled to provide plutonium for new warheads.

    The first submarine of Britain's new class, the HMS Vanguard, went on its initial patrol in December 1994. The second, the Victorious, entered service in December 1995. The third, the Vigilant, was launched in October 1995 and entered service in the fall of 1998. The fourth and final boat of the class, the Vengeance, was launched on September 19, 1998, with service entry scheduled for late 2000 or early 2001. The current estimated cost of the program is $18.8 billion.

    Each Vanguard-class SSBN carries 16 U.S.-produced Trident II D-5 submarine launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs). Technically, there are no specifically American or British Trident IIs. A pool of SLBMs are kept at the Strategic Weapons Facility Atlantic at the Kings Bay Submarine Base in Georgia. Britain has title to 58, but does not actually own them. A missile that is deployed on a U.S. SSBN may at a later date deploy on a British boat, or vice versa.

    How many warheads will there be in the future British stockpile? Several factors go into the calculation. We assume that Britain will produce enough warheads for only three boatloads of missiles, a practice it followed with Polaris. As was stated in the Strategic Defence Review, there will be "fewer than 200 operationally available warheads." If all four boats were fully loaded (MIRVed with three warheads) that would total 192. But the purchase of only 58 missiles means there will not be a full complement of missiles for all four boats. The government also stated that normally only one SSBN will be on patrol, with the other three in various states of readiness. A further consideration is the "substrategic" mission. A Ministry of Defence official described a substrategic strike as "the limited and highly selective use of nuclear weapons in a manner that fell demonstrably short of a strategic strike, but with a sufficient level of violence to convince an aggressor who had already miscalculated our resolve and attacked us that he should halt his aggression and withdraw or face the prospect of a devastating strategic strike."

    This substrategic mission began with Victorious and "will become fully robust when Vigilant enters service," according to the Ministry of Defence's 1996 White Paper.

    Some Trident II SLBMs have a single warhead and are assigned targets once covered by WE177 gravity bombs. For example, when the Vigilant is on patrol, 10, 12, or 14 of its SLBMs may carry up to three warheads per missile, but the other two, four, or six missiles may be armed with just one warhead. There is also some flexibility in the choice of yield of the Trident warhead. (Choosing to detonate only the unboosted primary could produce a yield of only a few kilotons.) With dual missions, an SSBN would have approximately 36-44 warheads on board during patrol.

    We conclude that the future British stockpile for the SSBN fleet will be around 160 warheads. With an additional 15 percent for spares, we estimate the total British stockpile to be approximately 185 warheads. At any given time, the sole SSBN on patrol might carry about 40 warheads. The second and third SSBNs could put to sea fairly rapidly with a similar loading, while the fourth might take longer due to its cycle of overhaul and maintenance.

    In October 1998 the HMS Splendid sailed to the United States to collect Britain's first consignment of Tomahawk cruise missiles. The Royal Navy has purchased 65 Block III conventionally armed missiles at a cost of 190 million pounds. Seven attack submarines of the Swiftsure and Trafalgar classes will be equipped to fire the Tomahawk land-attack missile from vertical launch systems. On March 25, 1999, Britain fired Tomahawk missiles at Serbian targets in support of Operation Allied Force. The incorporation of Tomahawks into the British military is bound to complicate accounting and verification measures in any future START treaty that includes the nuclear version of the Tomahawk.

  5. #125
    Ray
    Ray is offline
    Military Professional Ray's Avatar
    Join Date
    20 Aug 03
    Posts
    19,624
    Now with the above posts:

    Seconds out of the ring. Boxers.

    Shake hands.

    Box on!

  6. #126
    Regular
    Join Date
    07 Dec 04
    Posts
    26
    Quote Originally Posted by AzzurroItalia
    And remind me, how will Britain's challenger 2s attack the French Army? Swim?
    Much of the British Army is based in Germany.

    1st (UK) Armoured Div.

    4th Armoured Brig.

    7th Armoured Brig.

    20th Armoured Brig.
    Last edited by Cjwinnit; 22 Feb 05, at 16:04.

  7. #127
    New Member
    Join Date
    18 Feb 05
    Posts
    22
    In this conditions without nukes, without other countries support I think France will be the winner.. France have better local military industy than UK (see EF2000 does not have a made from Europe missile but a US AIM-9 and AIM-120).. Of corse the winning of France will be with great loses but a win remains a win.. The countries have equal ecomomy and sort equal military capabilities in no nuclear, chemical or biological technology (in these sectors Frace is the leader in Europe (except Russia)).. But France have better project military and space knownless this is the difference!

  8. #128
    Regular
    Join Date
    07 Dec 04
    Posts
    26
    Quote Originally Posted by molf48
    EF2000 does not have a made from Europe missile
    ASRAAM, ALARM, Storm Shadow?

  9. #129
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    28 Nov 04
    Location
    The Great Southern USA, Georgia
    Posts
    963
    What happened to Pirate? I think he disapeared.
    "Our citizenship in the United States is our national character. Our citizenship in any particular state is only our local distinction. By the latter we are known at home, by the former to the world. Our great title is AMERICANS…" -- Thomas Paine

  10. #130
    Regular Europeanarmy's Avatar
    Join Date
    27 Feb 05
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    48
    Quote Originally Posted by molf48
    In this conditions without nukes, without other countries support I think France will be the winner.. France have better local military industy than UK (see EF2000 does not have a made from Europe missile but a US AIM-9 and AIM-120).. Of corse the winning of France will be with great loses but a win remains a win.. The countries have equal ecomomy and sort equal military capabilities in no nuclear, chemical or biological technology (in these sectors Frace is the leader in Europe (except Russia)).. But France have better project military and space knownless this is the difference!
    I agree. France has the lead for naval and air forces:
    -French new aircraft carrier (Charles de Gaulle) is far more modern than the three little aircraft carrier of the Royal Navy. And French Rafales are superior to British Harriers .
    -French air force is equiped with Mirage 2000-5 for air superiority, also superior to British Tornados. So...the winner is obvious.

  11. #131
    Regular
    Join Date
    07 Dec 04
    Posts
    26
    Quote Originally Posted by Europeanarmy
    I agree. France has the lead for naval and air forces:
    -French new aircraft carrier (Charles de Gaulle) is far more modern than the three little aircraft carrier of the Royal Navy. And French Rafales are superior to British Harriers .
    -French air force is equiped with Mirage 2000-5 for air superiority, also superior to British Tornados. So...the winner is obvious.
    You miss a potent section of naval warfare: submarine forces.

    And not to get into an argument over whether the British Perisher course is better than the French programme, or whether Tomahawk is a worthwhile weapon, or whether Spearfish torpedoes are the best in NATO, or whether we have numerical superiority, or whether our ASW surface forces are more numerous, better and diverse (Nimrod, Type 23....)

    Whilst the Charles de Gaulle is an excellent asset to have, it's worth putting into context. A France-UK conflict would pit 1 French carrier against 3 British smaller carriers, with 11 SSN's on the UK side with 6 French ones.

    Put it another way: 1 French carrier will have 11 British SSN's after it. 3 British carriers will have 6 SSN's after them. And I think we are somewhat exaggerating the threat of naval air power considering the proximity of the two countries.

    Tornado is not to be sniffed at considering it is the fastest plane in the world at sea level..
    Last edited by Cjwinnit; 01 Mar 05, at 14:25.

  12. #132
    Banned jon_j_rambo's Avatar
    Join Date
    29 Nov 04
    Posts
    261
    both sides would be destroyed. The strength of both air forces & bombers....along with missles.

  13. #133
    Regular
    Join Date
    07 Dec 04
    Posts
    26
    Quote Originally Posted by jon_j_rambo
    both sides would be destroyed. The strength of both air forces & bombers....along with missles.
    The French navy carrier would be wiped out in 48 hours by the Royal Navy and the British carriers would be wiped out in about 72 by the French Air Force. After that it's an open contest..

  14. #134
    Patron scotsboyuk's Avatar
    Join Date
    17 Feb 05
    Location
    Blighty
    Posts
    285
    You all seem to have ignored the most important factor in such a hypothetical contest, which would guarantee victory for Britain, pigheaded stupidity. The reason that Britain wins so often is that we simply don't recognise that we can be defeated. We just carry on regardless of the odds and opposition until we somehow win, muddling through, it has served us well for centuries.
    "I may be drunk my dear woman, but in the morning I will be sober, and you will still be ugly." WSC

  15. #135
    Administrator Martin's Avatar
    Join Date
    13 Aug 03
    Posts
    275
    Rule Britannia!

    When it comes to war - The United Kingdom simply will not accept defeat. We have too much pride. Thankfully.

    As great Winston said......

    We shall go on to the end, we shall fight in France, we shall fight on the seas and oceans, we shall fight with growing confidence and growing strength in the air, we shall defend our Island, whatever the cost may be, we shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender, and even if, which I do not for a moment believe, this Island or a large part of it were subjugated and starving, then our Empire beyond the seas, armed and guarded by the British Fleet, would carry on the struggle, until, in God's good time, the New World, with all its power and might, steps forth to the rescue and the liberation of the old."

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. France and its Muslims: Riots, Jihadism and Depoliticisation
    By Ray in forum International Economy
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 09 Apr 06,, 07:26
  2. French perfidy: The Chirac Doctrine
    By Bluesman in forum International Politics
    Replies: 66
    Last Post: 11 Nov 05,, 05:02
  3. The fall of France
    By tarek in forum International Politics
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 27 Sep 04,, 23:26
  4. France Stinks!
    By themuffinman in forum International Politics
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11 Jun 04,, 15:39
  5. Analysis: Ivory Coast Civil War
    By Ironduke in forum The Middle East and North Africa
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08 May 04,, 04:30

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •