+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 16 to 18 of 18

Thread: PLA – A quick Reference.

  1. #16
    Staff Emeritus
    Join Date
    06 Aug 03
    Posts
    21,965
    Country: Canada
    Quote Originally Posted by AdityaMookerjee View Post
    The military options seem to be very elaborate.
    Actually, they are behind the times.

    Quote Originally Posted by AdityaMookerjee View Post
    Isn't it a waste of resources? If the Chinese military are building up, for their own sake, then I guess one can say nothing on the matter. If one looks at the situation, what is the People's Liberation Army around for?
    To defend the CCP.

    Quote Originally Posted by AdityaMookerjee View Post
    There are no threats to her sovereignty, either from internal, or external sources. Perhaps, because the nation is so large, she needs the armed forces in close proximity to every border.
    Are you freaking serious? The last time China had a weak army, she got invaded by Japan.
    Chimo

  2. #17
    Defense Moderator
    Defense Professional
    Lei Feng Protege
    xinhui's Avatar
    Join Date
    17 May 06
    Posts
    7,454
    Country: Guatemala
    Chinese Minister of National Defense said on Tuesday it had reduced the country's military reserves forces from 600,000 to 510,000 men and women over the past five years.

    China has also reduced the number of people in its militias from 10 million to eight million during the same period, said Gen. Liang Guanglie in an interview with Xinhua.

    It is the first time the Chinese government has given the exact number of people in the reserve forces and militias. In times of emergencies, the reserve forces and militias can be ordered to assist China's 2.3-million regular troops, the People's Liberation Army (PLA).

    Although China has experienced around 30 years of peace, Gen. Liang said the PLA has never relaxed its military preparations and vigilance especially at a time when "regional military conflicts can not be ruled out."

    In times of peace, the PLA's reserves conduct regular military training and participate in non-combat military operations, such as disaster relief work.

    The minister said the PLA had pushed forward military reforms in the past five years to build a more powerful military with upgraded weapon systems and high-quality personnel.

    Currently, 80 percent of the PLA's officers have four years of higher education compared with 25.8 percent in 1998, Gen. Liang said.

    To improve the quality of military personnel, the Chinese government has encouraged university graduates to join the armed forces since 2009. More than 100,000 college graduates gained their uniforms in 2010.

    In the past five years, China has dispatched more than 13,000 United Nations-commissioned peacekeepers to carry out 13 U.N. missions around the world, according to Liang.

    The PLA also sent professional units to Haiti, Pakistan and other countries and regions for disaster relief efforts and to give medical aids and other humanitarian relief, he said.
    DM: China Has 510,000 in Military Reserves
    “the misery of being exploited by capitalists is nothing compared to the misery of not being exploited at all” -- Joan Robinson

  3. #18
    Patron
    Join Date
    05 Nov 09
    Posts
    257
    Quote Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
    Actually, they are behind the times.
    Beijing probably realized just how high the price tag is if you want to maintain a military much like what the US has. Surely they do not want to end up like the Soviet Union - which collapsed as a result of all that Cold War military spending.

    To defend the CCP.
    I thought that was the job of the People's Armed Police - at least through their immediate task of enforcing public order in high-risk situations.

    Are you freaking serious? The last time China had a weak army, she got invaded by Japan.
    True, 100%. Lucky for the Allies in WW2; had China fought for the Japanese side, WW2 would've taken longer to finish and China's industrial might would've allowed Japan to sustain a war effort on the same scale as the Americans. An "Arsenal of Tyranny", as it would've been termed in 1940's America.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Interview with PLAAF LGen Liu Yazhou
    By Officer of Engineers in forum The Field Mess
    Replies: 59
    Last Post: 04 Jun 11,, 19:09
  2. Top Ten Chinese Military Modernization Developments
    By oneman28 in forum East Asia and the Pacific
    Replies: 96
    Last Post: 23 Jun 08,, 06:49
  3. PLAN Analysis
    By rickusn in forum Naval Warfare
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 12 Jun 06,, 20:05
  4. China's Changing Military Ideology
    By Frank Zhou in forum World Affairs Board Pub
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03 May 06,, 23:58
  5. Bangladesh plays the China card
    By Ray in forum East Asia and the Pacific
    Replies: 136
    Last Post: 17 Oct 05,, 15:14

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts