+ Reply to Thread
Page 4 of 8 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 119

Thread: Attack on Chinese Border Post

  1. #46
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    12 Jul 08
    Posts
    777
    Country: Hong Kong
    Although there are mutually unintelligible dialects, there has bee only one version of written Chinese since the Qin Dynasty.

  2. #47
    Ray
    Ray is offline
    Military Professional Ray's Avatar
    Join Date
    20 Aug 03
    Posts
    19,528
    Country: India
    In the English language, the Hans are often (and in the view of many Chinese incorrectly) referred to as simply "Chinese". Whether or not the use of the term Chinese correctly or incorrectly refers only to Han Chinese often is the subject of heated debate.

    Among some southern Han Chinese, a different term exists within various languages like Cantonese, Hakka and Minnan – Tángrén (唐人, literally "the people of Tang"). This term derives from a later Chinese dynasty, the Tang Dynasty, which is regarded as another zenith of Chinese civilization. The term survives in one of the Chinese names for Chinatown: 唐人街 (pinyin: Tángrénjiē); literally meaning "Street of the people of Tang".

    The history of the Han Chinese ethnic group is closely tied to that of China. Han Chinese trace their ancestry back to the Huaxia people, who lived along the Yellow River in northern China. The famous Chinese historian Sima Qian's Records of the Grand Historian dates the reign of the Yellow Emperor, the legendary ancestor of the Han Chinese, to 2698 BCE to 2599 BCE. Although study of this period of history is complicated by lack of historical records, discovery of archaeological sites have identified a succession of Neolithic cultures along the Yellow River. Along the central reaches of the Yellow River were the Jiahu culture (7000 BCE to 6600 BCE), Yangshao culture (5000 BCE to 3000 BCE) and Longshan culture (3000 BCE to 2000 BCE). Along the lower reaches of the river were the Qingliangang culture (5400 BCE to 4000 BCE), the Dawenkou culture (4300 BCE to 2500 BCE), the Longshan culture (2500 BCE to 2000 BCE), and the Yueshi culture.

    Chinese records give no clear answers as to how or from where this people came to live in the region. In the 19th century, there were numerous conjectures and speculations published as to their previous or original location, ranging anywhere from Ancient Egypt to India to Mongolia. Around the turn of the 20th century, a French author, Terrien de Lacouperie, proposed a theory tracing them to a tribe supposedly found in Elamite inscriptions as "Bak-sing" or "Bak" being southeast of the Caspian Sea. Although most specific elements of this theory were soon discredited as being based upon several outright misreadings and other less-than-compelling evidence (such as equating the Yellow Emperor, Hwang-ti with the Mesopotamian god Nahhunte), several scholars continued to maintain into the 1920s that an Akkadian origin for the Han Chinese was still the most likely. Lacouperie's erroneous books were also translated into Japanese as well as widely promoted in China, often by Japanese interests, with the result that such "Western Origins" theories became thoroughly discredited after World War Two. The most that can be said with certainty today is that Chinese annals are silent on the question.


    "Some have learnt many Tricks of sly Evasion, Instead of Truth they use Equivocation, And eke it out with mental Reservation, Which is to good Men an Abomination."

    I don't have to attend every argument I'm invited to.

    HAKUNA MATATA

  3. #48
    Ray
    Ray is offline
    Military Professional Ray's Avatar
    Join Date
    20 Aug 03
    Posts
    19,528
    Country: India
    Han Chinese Y Chromosome Test Results
    24 01 2008

    This is not shocking, I’ve seen many test results that show Northern Chinese tend to group with North East Asians (Japanese and Koreans) and Southern Chinese tend to group more with Southeast Asians. The populations also have distinct (but often overlapping) appearances. Many of my Chinese friends have told me it is due to diet and climate. I do not think so.

    The early genetic research (The History and Geography of Human Genes, 1996) of Dr. Luigi Luca Cavalli-Sforza showed that Northern Chinese could be grouped with other Northeast Asians (Koreans, Tungusic groups, Japanese) and that Southern Chinese grouped more with Southeast Asians, making the Han Chinese aggregate an intermediate population between the two, which matches their location geographic location. This new report gives us some detail as to the way this population cline occurred.

    Based on what I know of Chinese history, Southern China was settled by the Han much later than the North and the people in the South were considered “barbarian” referred to as the various types of “Yue” (known as the 100 Yue) in later times. Eventually the people region that became Guangdong and North Vietnam were referred to as (Nan Yue, or South Viet). Most of these people were likely Austroasiatic speakers in origin (like present day Vietnamese and Cambodians). Since Northern Vietnam (Annam) was part of China on and off for over 1,000 years; and the south, by the end of Chinese colonization was controlled by Champa, a Malay people (Austronesian).

    As far as I know there was a massive influx of Han Chinese into the region during the Song Dynasty due to Barbarian pressure in the north. I know assimilation was fairly complete by the Tang Dynasty as Cantonese speakers often call themselves “Tong (Tang in Mandarin) People” and talk of giving their children “Tong names”. They also still refer to their province and themselves as “Yue” to this day. I’m guessing by the Late Tang, the Sinization of the area was complete, but for Annam. Vietnam became independent from China after the disintegration of the Tang, since the “Viet or Yue” people lived in what is now Guangdong as well, I’m guessing by that time the people in Guangdong were mostly Sinized, and considered themselves Han Chinese, but most of the people further South did not.

    Also, “South,” in China is the area from Shanghai down to the border of the Southeast Asian nations of Laos and Vietnam.

    Other nonHan ethnicities lived in the South, such as the Lao/Thai (Tai-Kadai language group) folks also came from Central China and were pushed South by the Han, they still have relatives in modern China like the Zhuang and Dong peoples.

    To wrap it up, it is not shocking that Han men (like many men before them all over the world) would move to an area and take it over, while enslaving, killing, or running off the native men using their superior technology and social organization. Then they would marry, rape, or concubine the local women. Men, historically, are not picky about who they have sexual relations with. In a desperate spot any woman (even a barbarian) will do.

    This new study provides more detail to earlier studies whose results where along the same lines.

    European Journal of Human Genetics advance online publication 23 January 2008; doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201998
    A spatial analysis of genetic structure of human populations in China reveals distinct difference between maternal and paternal lineages

    Fuzhong Xue et al.

    Analyses of archeological, anatomical, linguistic, and genetic data suggested consistently the presence of a significant boundary between the populations of north and south in China. However, the exact location and the strength of this boundary have remained controversial. In this study, we systematically explored the spatial genetic structure and the boundary of north–south division of human populations using mtDNA data in 91 populations and Y-chromosome data in 143 populations. Our results highlight a distinct difference between spatial genetic structures of maternal and paternal lineages. A substantial genetic differentiation between northern and southern populations is the characteristic of maternal structure, with a significant uninterrupted genetic boundary extending approximately along the Huai River and Qin Mountains north to Yangtze River. On the paternal side, however, no obvious genetic differentiation between northern and southern populations is revealed.

    Han Chinese Y Chromosome Test Results « The Postnational Monitor


    "Some have learnt many Tricks of sly Evasion, Instead of Truth they use Equivocation, And eke it out with mental Reservation, Which is to good Men an Abomination."

    I don't have to attend every argument I'm invited to.

    HAKUNA MATATA

  4. #49
    Fully Dressed Military Professional Deltacamelately's Avatar
    Join Date
    29 Sep 07
    Posts
    1,156
    Country: India
    Sir,
    An excellent read I must say.
    And on the sixth day, God created the Field Artillery...

  5. #50
    tankie Military Professional tankie's Avatar
    Join Date
    22 Nov 06
    Location
    u/k
    Posts
    10,424
    Country: UK
    Quote Originally Posted by King Six View Post
    You'd be surprised to find out just how many Chinese cities rival New York and Chicago in terms of the skyline. Not quite sure what's inside all those skyscrapers though..
    Probably dog being cooked






    TANKIE. ECO WARRIOR , SAVE THE TREES

  6. #51
    Fully Dressed Military Professional Deltacamelately's Avatar
    Join Date
    29 Sep 07
    Posts
    1,156
    Country: India
    Quote Originally Posted by tankie View Post
    Probably dog being cooked
    Lol, what would the dish be called? ChillyDoggy.
    And on the sixth day, God created the Field Artillery...

  7. #52
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    12 Jul 08
    Posts
    777
    Country: Hong Kong
    Quote Originally Posted by Ray View Post
    Han Chinese Y Chromosome Test Results
    24 01 2008

    This is not shocking, I’ve seen many test results that show Northern Chinese tend to group with North East Asians (Japanese and Koreans) and Southern Chinese tend to group more with Southeast Asians. The populations also have distinct (but often overlapping) appearances. Many of my Chinese friends have told me it is due to diet and climate. I do not think so.

    The early genetic research (The History and Geography of Human Genes, 1996) of Dr. Luigi Luca Cavalli-Sforza showed that Northern Chinese could be grouped with other Northeast Asians (Koreans, Tungusic groups, Japanese) and that Southern Chinese grouped more with Southeast Asians, making the Han Chinese aggregate an intermediate population between the two, which matches their location geographic location. This new report gives us some detail as to the way this population cline occurred.

    Based on what I know of Chinese history, Southern China was settled by the Han much later than the North and the people in the South were considered “barbarian” referred to as the various types of “Yue” (known as the 100 Yue) in later times. Eventually the people region that became Guangdong and North Vietnam were referred to as (Nan Yue, or South Viet). Most of these people were likely Austroasiatic speakers in origin (like present day Vietnamese and Cambodians). Since Northern Vietnam (Annam) was part of China on and off for over 1,000 years; and the south, by the end of Chinese colonization was controlled by Champa, a Malay people (Austronesian).

    As far as I know there was a massive influx of Han Chinese into the region during the Song Dynasty due to Barbarian pressure in the north. I know assimilation was fairly complete by the Tang Dynasty as Cantonese speakers often call themselves “Tong (Tang in Mandarin) People” and talk of giving their children “Tong names”. They also still refer to their province and themselves as “Yue” to this day. I’m guessing by the Late Tang, the Sinization of the area was complete, but for Annam. Vietnam became independent from China after the disintegration of the Tang, since the “Viet or Yue” people lived in what is now Guangdong as well, I’m guessing by that time the people in Guangdong were mostly Sinized, and considered themselves Han Chinese, but most of the people further South did not.

    Also, “South,” in China is the area from Shanghai down to the border of the Southeast Asian nations of Laos and Vietnam.

    Other nonHan ethnicities lived in the South, such as the Lao/Thai (Tai-Kadai language group) folks also came from Central China and were pushed South by the Han, they still have relatives in modern China like the Zhuang and Dong peoples.

    To wrap it up, it is not shocking that Han men (like many men before them all over the world) would move to an area and take it over, while enslaving, killing, or running off the native men using their superior technology and social organization. Then they would marry, rape, or concubine the local women. Men, historically, are not picky about who they have sexual relations with. In a desperate spot any woman (even a barbarian) will do.

    This new study provides more detail to earlier studies whose results where along the same lines.

    European Journal of Human Genetics advance online publication 23 January 2008; doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201998
    A spatial analysis of genetic structure of human populations in China reveals distinct difference between maternal and paternal lineages

    Fuzhong Xue et al.

    Analyses of archeological, anatomical, linguistic, and genetic data suggested consistently the presence of a significant boundary between the populations of north and south in China. However, the exact location and the strength of this boundary have remained controversial. In this study, we systematically explored the spatial genetic structure and the boundary of north–south division of human populations using mtDNA data in 91 populations and Y-chromosome data in 143 populations. Our results highlight a distinct difference between spatial genetic structures of maternal and paternal lineages. A substantial genetic differentiation between northern and southern populations is the characteristic of maternal structure, with a significant uninterrupted genetic boundary extending approximately along the Huai River and Qin Mountains north to Yangtze River. On the paternal side, however, no obvious genetic differentiation between northern and southern populations is revealed.

    Han Chinese Y Chromosome Test Results « The Postnational Monitor
    Right.

    As I said before, 'Chinese' is an imagined thing.

  8. #53
    Regular
    Join Date
    09 Apr 08
    Location
    China
    Posts
    137
    Quote Originally Posted by Kalashnikov View Post
    The urge for identity, freedom and self governance is a primordial one. No matter how much pumped up the idea of one nationhood of many races and ethnicities, however in the end each ethnic group will want its own homeland.

    Initially there will be a lot of resistance to the breakaway of provinces from the center. The center will do all it can - in terms of coercion by police, military, or through economic inducements and trying to buy out the separatist movements through promises of say economic privileges, economic development, reservations, granting special status etc.

    However, in the end identity will trump all other considerations. At first the resistance will be fierce as in Ireland VS England, Serbia vs Kosovo, Baltics+ Ukraine+ Caucuses vs Russia, Baloch vs Pakistan, Kurds vs Iran, Iraq, Turkey etc. Much blood will be shed. However in the end, after a certain level of political maturity and economic development is reached, the provinces wanting to break away will form separate nations. This will be a peaceful process and the center will allow it. Czechoslovakia, Germany and the constant redrawing boundaries of Europe for instance.

    Although by then, the economic integration among the regions will have been so great that the concept of statehood will have been rendered obsolete. Ladies and gentlemen, identity and tribalism is a force that is to be reckoned with. It is imbedded in our genes. It far supercedes the artificial construct of statehood. Eventually balkanization of the whole world will take place.

    We will have the nations of California, New England, southern states and other states along ethnic lines in the USA. Turkistan, Tibet, Inner Mongolia (which will merge with Mongolia), Manchuria, Han heartland, Southern China in place of the present nation of china, Punjab, Bengal, the south, the Indo-gangetic plains Kashmir etc in place of India, similarly Russia will disintegrate into the predominantly Slavic region of the west, the Tarter regions of the east, Siberia and the Caucuses will disintegrate into many other states along ethnic lines. Balkanization of the whole world will be the order of the day. However, by then a loose confederation of various Superstates (along the lines of the EU) will have emerged. The Superstates will then vie with each other for economic, political, military influences.

    Interesting post!

    But I have to say the Chinese history proved another path in terms of the separation and merger of ethnicities. The general trend in China history is the merger of various ethnicities instead of separation.

  9. #54
    Regular
    Join Date
    09 Apr 08
    Location
    China
    Posts
    137
    Quote Originally Posted by King Six View Post
    I was reading about the Chinese treatment of Uygurs and it's pretty bad but I do like the idea of only letting children into Mosques when they're old enough, they should extend that to all religions. And do it worldwide.
    The capital city of the Uygur provice looks pretty decent too, it looks like it's also benifiting from the Chinese boom. It's probably the richest place in that region of the world.
    In some cities, same rule apply to other religions, such as Christian and Catholic. And this is accused of violation of "freedom of religion" by western churches.

  10. #55
    Ray
    Ray is offline
    Military Professional Ray's Avatar
    Join Date
    20 Aug 03
    Posts
    19,528
    Country: India
    Quote Originally Posted by yeung3939 View Post
    Right.

    As I said before, 'Chinese' is an imagined thing.
    Nothing better to add?

    Are you suggesting Han vs the Rest?


    "Some have learnt many Tricks of sly Evasion, Instead of Truth they use Equivocation, And eke it out with mental Reservation, Which is to good Men an Abomination."

    I don't have to attend every argument I'm invited to.

    HAKUNA MATATA

  11. #56
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    12 Jul 08
    Posts
    777
    Country: Hong Kong
    Quote Originally Posted by Ray View Post
    Nothing better to add?

    Are you suggesting Han vs the Rest?
    Historical findings tell us China or Chinese is not the same thing as Han. The last empire of China, Qing Dynasty, was particularly keen on erasing the distinction between Han and non-Han.

    The northern Han people have 'barbarian' genes, and Mandarin (Beijing dialect) itself has 'minority group language' elements. It makes no sense to emphasize blood.

  12. #57
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    14 Mar 08
    Posts
    1,233
    It would probably be more accurate to identify it as a 'cultural' national identity, like with us Americans, even if it is an ethnicity.

  13. #58
    Contributor Tomluter's Avatar
    Join Date
    18 Apr 06
    Location
    ChongQing China
    Posts
    607
    Country: China
    I have something to say about our history.

    "Chinese and China" called by western. Even then end of dynastys, we rarely call ourself "ZhongGuo"(Central nation or Central empire)or "Zhonghua".

    But now, we like to call ourself "ZhongHua中华" . But,the history of this Chinese word or word group is long.

    In the word "ZhongHua" ,there are "Zhong" and "Hua" two single words in it .

    "Zhong" mean central,to represent the "middle land". The word "hua", Someone said that represent Hua'xia nationality,that is the Han-nationality's ancestry and main trunk .

    in the ancient times,"ZhongHua" is more like a geographical name.

    And, Han is not a pure blood nationality.

    Ray missed a impotant empire---the Empire of Han, (202 BC to 220 AC). all lieges were named Han-people,differentiated with Others whom like Hunnish or Yue (who were still in primitive tribalism at that time). The nationality name of Han began.

    Thenceforth Han mix blood with various nationalitys,even different human race, for 2000 years. Japanese said, blood structure of modern Han more like of Americans now.
    Last edited by Tomluter; 11 Aug 08, at 09:39.

  14. #59
    Ray
    Ray is offline
    Military Professional Ray's Avatar
    Join Date
    20 Aug 03
    Posts
    19,528
    Country: India
    Indeed, Hans settle in non Han areas, intermarry and mix the blood and make them Han!

    A excellent way to ensure homogeneity and thus nationhood. Devilishly clever but very effective!

    It changes the demography even though it is not of a ''pure'' line!

    However, the CCP has lost the benign touch of the older dynasties of China if this article is to be believed, written by a non India:

    UNITED TERROR FRONT
    FIFTH COLUMN - GWYNNE DYER

    “Safety is our top concern,” said China’s vice-president, Xi Jinping, in late July, pointing to the deployment of 100,000 troops around Beijing and the surface-to-air missile batteries that protect the main stadiums as proof of the regime’s determination to ensure that no terrorist attack would disrupt the Olympic Games. But it couldn’t stop two equally determined Uighur militants from killing 16 Chinese policemen and injuring another 16 in an attack on a border post near Kashgar.

    True, Kashgar is in the far north-western province of Xinjiang, 4,000 kilometres from Beijing, but if two men armed only with hand grenades and knives could do that much damage there, what is to stop others from doing it in Beijing?

    The best way to prevent terrorist attacks is to remove the grievances that motivate them, and to penetrate the terrorist organizations with informers. China hasn’t done very well on either front. In Xinjiang, as in Tibet, it has inundated the local population with a wave of Han Chinese immigrants who live essentially separate and far more prosperous lives, and created great resentment as a result. Ironically, the reason for the huge influx of Han Chinese immigrants is a ham-handed effort to quell separatist sentiments in the two provinces.

    Most Chinese believe that their country has ruled both Tibet and what used to be called East Turkestan since time immemorial, but in practice they only came under direct Chinese control in the mid-18th century, around the same time that the British were seizing control of India. So if Beijing doesn’t want its western territories to go the way of British India eventually, then it must find a way to bind Tibetans and Uighurs to China. The solution, Beijing reckoned, was development and rising prosperity, which would reconcile both Tibetans and Uighurs to Chinese rule.

    Common cause

    Maybe it would have, too, if the subject peoples had actually shared in the prosperity, but they didn’t. Educational levels and technical skills were gravely lacking in the indigenous populations, so the real effect was to draw in millions of Chinese immigrants who did have the necessary skills. And it was they, of course, who got all the good new jobs.

    In 1945, 90 per cent of Xinjiang’s population were Uighurs, a Muslim, Turkic-speaking people who are closely related to the other Muslim populations of central Asia. Now the Uighurs are down to 8 million out of 19 million: less than 45 percent of the population and falling fast. As in the case of Tibet, there has been rapid urbanization, but most of the native population live in ghettoes that are little better than slums, with no hope of getting the good jobs that are monopolized by Chinese immigrants. The difference between the two regions is that in Xinjiang there have been sporadic terrorist attacks against Chinese people and interests since the early 1990s.

    Uighurs have strong historical, cultural, religious and linguistic links with the other central Asian groups. That example, of course, was very seductive, and so a wide variety of Uighur separatist groups have carried out occasional terrorist attacks both in Xinjiang and in China proper over the past two decades. The rise of “Islamist” terrorism latterly has given them a more coherent ideology than mere nationalism, and also some useful contacts in the more distant parts of the Muslim world. They have killed a couple of hundred people in 20 years, but they remain a serious headache for the Chinese regime.

    So could Uighur separatists, or even Tibetan ones, carry out a terrorist attack in Beijing during the Olympics? Of course they could. Nothing too spectacular, of course. No hijacked airplanes crashing into stadiums. But two men (or women, for that matter) with grenades could do a lot of damage. Even 100,000 troops would need some luck to stop them.

    The Telegraph - Calcutta (Kolkata) | Opinion | united terror front


    "Some have learnt many Tricks of sly Evasion, Instead of Truth they use Equivocation, And eke it out with mental Reservation, Which is to good Men an Abomination."

    I don't have to attend every argument I'm invited to.

    HAKUNA MATATA

  15. #60
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    12 Jul 08
    Posts
    777
    Country: Hong Kong
    Quote Originally Posted by Skywatcher View Post
    It would probably be more accurate to identify it as a 'cultural' national identity, like with us Americans, even if it is an ethnicity.
    This was exactly how I defined 'Chinese' in some of my first posts in this forum.
    Last edited by yeung3939; 11 Aug 08, at 10:16.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. China the only Paradise in the world!
    By Ray in forum International Economy
    Replies: 96
    Last Post: 17 Jul 08,, 16:02
  2. Most needed in US NAVY
    By Praxus in forum Naval Warfare
    Replies: 345
    Last Post: 18 May 08,, 02:36
  3. For all those stuck in the Cold War..
    By rickusn in forum Europe and Russia
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11 Feb 07,, 07:05
  4. China’s democratization and reunification
    By pin_qinghai in forum East Asia and the Pacific
    Replies: 100
    Last Post: 06 Jan 07,, 12:59

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts