ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > General Forums > Current Affairs
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-22-2005, 16:41 PM   #1 (permalink)
Ray
Postmaster General
Military Professional
 
Ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-20-03
Posts: 26,144
Country:
Taliban operatives plan spring offensive

Quote:
Afghanistan News

Taliban operatives plan spring offensive

KABUL (Agencies): Taliban guerrillas are coordinating attacks on American and Afghan forces as part of a new springtime campaign of violence, the US military said after 17 militants died in a gunbattle.
Afghanistan has recently seen some of its fiercest fighting for months with more than 30 insurgents linked to the ousted Islamic regime dying in firefights in the past week, according to officials.
“I think that there is a coordinated effort by the insurgents to make attacks against the ANA (Afghan National Army) and coalition forces,” US military spokeswoman Lieutenant Cindy Moore told reporters in Kabul.
Three years of operations by an 18,000-strong US-led coalition have fragmented the ousted Islamic regime, but a top US commander warned last week they could coalesce ahead of parliamentary elections due in September.
Moore attributed the surge in violence to the warm spring weather, which has historically allowed militants to leave the mountainous hideouts they use during the freezing winter months. “I think we are seeing attacks of similar nature... to the last couple of years in spring,” she said, adding that Afghan and US forces would “aggressively pursue” the insurgents.
Local commanders said gunbattles in southeastern Zabul province on Monday left 17 militants dead, including some linked to the Al-Qaeda network. Officials said another 16, at least five of them Pakistani and Chechen nationals, were captured. Also on Monday, Afghan soldiers killed two Taliban militants and seized three others including a senior commander, officials said.
One week earlier US helicopter gunships and jets killed 12 militants after a Taliban ambush in southeastern Paktia province, officials said.
Early Wednesday insurgents in a Pakistani border village fired at least four “long-range” missiles which landed near a US-led military outpost in Afghanistan’s eastern Khost province, the provincial security commander said.
Afghan officials have repeatedly accused militants of crossing the porous border and using Pakistani territory to attack targets in Afghanistan.
However, the US-led military has repeatedly praised Pakistan’s military activities against the insurgents, most recently during a meeting between US, Afghan and Pakistani representatives in Islamabad.
http://frontierpost.com.pk/

This is from the Frontier Post of Pakistan.

The Frontier (NWFP) is adjacent to Afghanistan and hence this requires attention.

One must be on the guard.
Ray is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2005, 13:29 PM   #2 (permalink)
Confed999
Staff Emeritus
 
Confed999's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-10-03
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,681
Country:
Send a message via AIM to Confed999
The war isn't over, not by a long shot. I pray for the doom of these who wish to impose slavery on us all...
__________________
No man is free until all men are free - John Hossack
I agree completely with this Administration’s goal of a regime change in Iraq-John Kerry
even if that enforcement is mostly at the hands of the United States, a right we retain even if the Security Council fails to act-John Kerry
He may even miscalculate and slide these weapons off to terrorist groups to invite them to be a surrogate to use them against the United States. It’s the miscalculation that poses the greatest threat-John Kerry
Confed999 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2005, 15:36 PM   #3 (permalink)
Ray
Postmaster General
Military Professional
 
Ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-20-03
Posts: 26,144
Country:
I am little concerned since the elections are due and the Taliban are quite capable of causing a flap.
Ray is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2005, 19:37 PM   #4 (permalink)
Avenger
Patron
 
Join Date: 02-05-05
Location: Paradise
Posts: 203
Quote:
Originally Posted by Confed999
The war isn't over, not by a long shot. I pray for the doom of these who wish to impose slavery on us all...
Yeah, but what we're talking about here is little more than a misfit band of raving idiots. Hopefully they'll perish in great numbers while failing to kill many (if any) of the good guys.
Avenger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2005, 19:56 PM   #5 (permalink)
troung
A Self Important
Senior Contributor
 
troung's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-03-03
Posts: 4,236
Country:
Well the Taliban still have some major sales appeal with Afghani Pashtuns (the majority ethnic group) and Pakistani Pashtuns. Mostly the rural "red staters" but it gives them a base of support. But they will be stuck at being tribal bandits without a major scale cash infusion. The Taliban did not control 75% of Afghanistan because they were that damn good, just they had that damn much of a bankroll which made up for things. But we have the ultamite carrot (our big pockets) and a much more powerful stick (our military) then they could hope to match.
troung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2005, 02:37 AM   #6 (permalink)
platinum786
Banished
 
platinum786's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-14-04
Posts: 1,986
troung has hit the nail on the ehad, the puhstoon connection to Taliban is tribal and religious, however bigger than that its finiancial and political.

If you can get these people rerepsented properly without taliban and flash a lill green....Taliban are as dead as the Dodo.
platinum786 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2005, 21:07 PM   #7 (permalink)
troung
A Self Important
Senior Contributor
 
troung's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-03-03
Posts: 4,236
Country:
Quote:
troung has hit the nail on the ehad, the puhstoon connection to Taliban is tribal and religious, however bigger than that its finiancial and political.
Thanks

We got the big pockets to buy loyalty of warlords, we just need a better Pasthun front man. The hard part is to find a Pasthun with "street cred" and who we can place there yet without him being tainted by having been part of the Taliban. Kabul based mullahs were generally not as extreme as the Kandahar based ones yet they are all hard to sell to the NA and their base and of course USA public. The Northern Alliance didn't want an ex Taliban no matter how close to the center (out how far from the ultra far right) they were. The whole thing about Pakistan wanting Taliban "moderates" and the NA asking if they were "moderate" why were they part of the Taliban shows that.

Karzai is more or less a joke which no one there wants, kind of the man who would be king. He gave money to the Taliban, ended up in the Massoud run jail, ran to Pakistan, got booted out of Pakistan, and showed up the "fight" the Taliban only after 9-11. He doesn't even have the respect of the NA warlords much less "street cred" the Pasthuns or the nieghboring nations. He doesn't even have a real base (read: militia to call on). The big boys like Khan, Fahim and Dostum can call up big time militias.

We can kill the Taliban off just with how things are going. Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Pakistan will no longer bankroll their operations which drops the weapons, bribes and amount of men they could try and keep the field. But a civil war with all the kids on the block and outside of the block could happen after we leave if we can't get every group to feel as if it is part of the government. Massoud had planned that when the Taliban were defeated he would share power wigth every ethnic group to end the civil war and leave no one out in the cold. We just have to rep the Pasthuns better
troung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2005, 09:12 AM   #8 (permalink)
Bluesman
WAB Bartender
Defense Professional
Military Professional
 
Bluesman's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-24-04
Location: Vacaville, CA.
Posts: 7,387
Country:
There will be no 'spring offensive' worthy of the name.

OPSTEMPO will increase, but there isn't enough coordination between enemy cells/units/organizations to synchronize ops.

Although I can only HOPE that we see large concentrations, long movements, and massive employment of weapons, because that works for US, and plays against their strengths.

So, as much as I would like for the last remnants to try to go out in a blaze of glory, I suspect that they will just continue to do what they do best, just more of it. They need to keep a force-in-being up in the hills to keep the war going on and on, and they're terrified of our firepower. So the War of the Mine and Booby-trap will continue.

And we'll just have to content ourselves with destroying them slowly and eventually, instead of one last great spasm.

But destroy them we will.
__________________
"The quickest way of ending a war is to lose it, and if one finds the prospect of a long war intolerable, it is natural to disbelieve in the possibility of victory."
- George Orwell
Bluesman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2005, 09:58 AM   #9 (permalink)
speedracer
Banished
 
Join Date: 04-24-05
Posts: 22
send out the bombers!
speedracer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2005, 13:11 PM   #10 (permalink)
ChrisF202
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 08-12-03
Location: Long Island, New York, USA
Posts: 2,575
Country:
Send a message via AIM to ChrisF202
Quote:
But destroy them we will.
Damn right on that, its only a matter of time. The Taliban and Al Qaeda forces have lost probably 100+ men for every one of our guys they kill, they cant have very many fighters left, probably 2 - 3,000 at most.
ChrisF202 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2005, 18:11 PM   #11 (permalink)
platinum786
Banished
 
platinum786's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-14-04
Posts: 1,986
To be honest, if the pashtun you find has a big enough stick, who cares wether the N.A like him or not, if this guy is big enough to take over himself (without being Taliban), and has US backing then N.A know they are not needed, so they will take any share of power given to them. You have tor ealise N.A are a small minority of Afghanistan.
platinum786 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2005, 20:13 PM   #12 (permalink)
troung
A Self Important
Senior Contributor
 
troung's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-03-03
Posts: 4,236
Country:
Quote:
To be honest, if the pashtun you find has a big enough stick, who cares wether the N.A like him or not, if this guy is big enough to take over himself (without being Taliban), and has US backing then N.A know they are not needed, so they will take any share of power given to them.
And we found a wimp who used to back the Taliban.

Having a lot of cred with the Pasthuns is hard to do without coming off as a "fundo" to us. And the ones with the big stick even if not Taliban (where on earth were they then in the 1990s ) would possible be HIA or just something else. I just guess it would be hard to find a Pashtun that would make everyone happy. I'm looking through my files to see if any top Taliban (Kabul based) fell out with them before hand.

Quote:
You have tor ealise N.A are a small minority of Afghanistan.
But on the same hand those are the guys that fought alongside us and provide the forces we operate alongside. We supported Ali as he took over Jalalabad for example. And lets not get into Dostum, Fahim and Khan more or less doing as they please. But yet we don't want to cut them out as they between them have the largest force within the nation and external backing. Plus they did fight alongside of us to remove the Taliban.

I guess we need some sort of power sharing agreement between the major power brokers (not expats with no base like what happened in 2001 in Germany). But that would have to have so many minority rights as to offend the majority.

Last edited by troung : 04-30-2005 at 20:19 PM.
troung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2005, 20:38 PM   #13 (permalink)
platinum786
Banished
 
platinum786's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-14-04
Posts: 1,986
my point is N.A need you more than you would need them, they would play ball, and Pushtoon player doesn't have to be backed 100% by them, it could be a guy they hate, coz they know when US forces stop backing them, they're nothing, even the Taliban had them stuck.
platinum786 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2005, 21:13 PM   #14 (permalink)
troung
A Self Important
Senior Contributor
 
troung's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-03-03
Posts: 4,236
Country:
Quote:
my point is N.A need you more than you would need them, they would play ball, and Pushtoon player doesn't have to be backed 100% by them, it could be a guy they hate
Well we also need the NA forces to keep things somewhat in check. He have around 10k American troops there and there are a bunch of allied soldiers there as well. Yet we still use NA forces on combat operations. They are acting up because they dislike/don't respect Karzai and know he has no base of support. Pakistan does not like him either. He is not big in Pasthun areas. He is not the mayor of Kabul for nothing . And as of last "election" it was clear the entire NA leadership disliked him.

Hell we might have to let so called "moderate" Taliban more into things. The Kabul based leadership was more "moderate" then the Kandahar faction (which ran the show). Yet the NA is totally opposed to that, and our public might not like it either. But the NA is still of use to us and we don't want to lose them.

In the perfect world there would have been a high level Taliban defector (before 9-11) with sales appeal for many Pasthuns and at the least would get along with the NA. God what a cluster****.

Quote:
coz they know when US forces stop backing them, they're nothing, even the Taliban had them stuck.
The Taliban only had them stuck because of the money issue and of course Pakistan sent in guys to support the Taliban as well. Cut all of that out and one is back to same the Taliban which failed to take Kabul without external help (money to bribe Pasthun fighters). The first several pushes were crushed until Pakistan and Saudi Arabia flooded in money. Hell Pakistan had to set up the IEAAF and fly many of the planes. And these days as far as forces go the NA is pretty much the largest force within the nation.
troung is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Afghanistan and the Future of Warfare troung Military Aviation 5 02-22-2008 20:59 PM
PLAN Analysis rickusn Naval Forces 9 06-12-2006 15:05 PM
Mullah's leading the charge... troung The Field Mess 11 03-28-2006 10:59 AM
Future of afghanistan raja khan Operation Enduring Freedom 113 09-20-2004 19:23 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:43 AM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8