ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > General Forums > Current Affairs
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-12-2008, 19:17 PM   #61 (permalink)
JAD_333
Defense Professional
 
JAD_333's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-15-07
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,684
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by jame$thegreat View Post
It is just that an officer would be less likely to believe someone who uses drugs than someone who does not, I don't agree with this reasoning, but this stigma will exist for at least a generation of law enforcement.
Believe what? Hard addicts wear a worse stigma now than they would under a controlled drug distribution program. Your reasoning seems to be that you'd rather break the law privately than obey it publicly.


Quote:
There is a big difference between individual vendors or credit card companies recording your purchases and a vast national organization completely dedicated to tracking what you have purchased, how much and where. This is in many ways an invasion of privacy. As much as I am for the legalization of drugs, I doubt I am willing to forfeit these many of my rights for that goal.
No difference. You characterize tracking purchases for the purpose of limiting them as a huge invasion of privacy. If banks didn't track your account balance they wouldn't know when to stop giving you money. Perscriptions for medicines are also tracked and some perscriptions cannot be refilled. These are systems designed to perform administrative tasks, not pry into all aspects of your life.

But let's put it another. No one would have to buy drugs. Only if they want to buy them do they have to get an special ID. Of course, the system could simply rely on driver licences, but that would be cumbersome because not all states put a mag tape on their driver licenses. You'd have to manually enter the info into a computer.
__________________
To be Truly ignorant, Man requires an Education. (Plato)
JAD_333 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 19:52 PM   #62 (permalink)
Tronic
Navajo Code Talker
Senior Contributor
 
Tronic's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-27-04
Location: Patiala, India
Posts: 5,287
Country:
Opinion on tracking drug users.

Its not going to be a very beneficial thing to do as it would defeat the purpose in many regards. A lot of college and university users (and no, I don't mean casual users, just once in a while sort of thing; during partying et all) won't be too happy with such laws tracking them. Main reason, if not anything else, is culture. Most of the partying, drinking or smoking (whatever) is done away from the knowledge of the people's families and mostly it happens on university or college residences. So if there is such a thing as keeping records of people who would go to the store and buy some mj; it would only mean that they would be again looking at others to purchase it from. Hence, defeating the whole purpose of regulating the drug.
__________________
Nabha Sparasham Deeptam
-Touch The Sky With Glory

Last edited by Tronic : 05-12-2008 at 19:57 PM.
Tronic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 20:35 PM   #63 (permalink)
Gun Grape
Resident Curmudgeon
Military Professional
 
Gun Grape's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-12-05
Location: Panama City Fl
Posts: 2,566
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tronic View Post
Its not going to be a very beneficial thing to do as it would defeat the purpose in many regards. .
And another reason it would not work. For the same reason ration cards and signing for booze in the package store way back when in Okinawa, didn't work.

You get the non-drinkers/non black marketing guys to use their cards for you.
Throw them a little cash as a thank you.

At least thats what I was told. I never picked new section members by their (non)drinking habits
Gun Grape is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 21:08 PM   #64 (permalink)
dark-alias
Military Professional
 
dark-alias's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-28-08
Location: California
Posts: 219
Country:
exactly,
I was on my way back from korea once and we were only allowed to bring back two bottles of soju each.....well we got all the non-drinkers together and filled there bags too. There would def. be an abuse of the system, just like there is with every social system this country has. I could never ever see hardcore drugs being legalized to the public, but maybe just myabe one day MJ could, it all depends who the people keep putting into office
dark-alias is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 22:27 PM   #65 (permalink)
JAD_333
Defense Professional
 
JAD_333's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-15-07
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,684
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tronic View Post
Its not going to be a very beneficial thing to do as it would defeat the purpose in many regards. A lot of college and university users (and no, I don't mean casual users, just once in a while sort of thing; during partying et all) won't be too happy with such laws tracking them. Main reason, if not anything else, is culture. Most of the partying, drinking or smoking (whatever) is done away from the knowledge of the people's families and mostly it happens on university or college residences. So if there is such a thing as keeping records of people who would go to the store and buy some mj; it would only mean that they would be again looking at others to purchase it from. Hence, defeating the whole purpose of regulating the drug.
No question there are downsides to the plan.

We could of course continue on the same path we are on, suffer the economic drain, keep putting offenders in jail, and watch the cartels grow in an ever increasing cycle of violence, and so on. Or, we could end all that and take on the problem of working to keep people from cheating on the new rules. Like gungrape points out underage users will look for adults willing to buy them some stuff, although with a limit to each purchase and a time limit on the next, adults might be reluctant to help anyone else.

There's always a tendency to hold back from doing anything new because of problems we see in it. Humans are ambivelent when it comes to new ideas. They tolerate imperfection in the real world, but demand perfection in ideas. We would not be driving cars today if we had acted on the fear that they might cause deadly accidents.

We have a choice. In the long run, we can enforce one system or the other. Either we use our law enforcement assets to continue the war on drugs or we use them to prevent cheating under a system of legalization. To me it's a no-brainer. Legalization will take far less money and manpower to enforce than the billions we are now throwing at criminalization, and it will be self-sustaining from taxes on drugs.

The first step in controlling the drug problem is to move it out of the shadows of criminalization and into the light of legalization. That won't end the drug problem, insofar as consumers are concerned, but it will do away with all the bloodsuckers associated with it. Once out of the shadows, we can begin educating users and, in time, cut down on drug use.
JAD_333 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 23:17 PM   #66 (permalink)
Parihaka
Moderator
 
Parihaka's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-10-04
Location: Te Ika a Maui
Posts: 9,462
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by JAD_333 View Post
No question there are downsides to the plan.

We could of course continue on the same path we are on, suffer the economic drain, keep putting offenders in jail, and watch the cartels grow in an ever increasing cycle of violence, and so on. Or, we could end all that and take on the problem of working to keep people from cheating on the new rules. Like gungrape points out underage users will look for adults willing to buy them some stuff, although with a limit to each purchase and a time limit on the next, adults might be reluctant to help anyone else.

There's always a tendency to hold back from doing anything new because of problems we see in it. Humans are ambivelent when it comes to new ideas. They tolerate imperfection in the real world, but demand perfection in ideas. We would not be driving cars today if we had acted on the fear that they might cause deadly accidents.

We have a choice. In the long run, we can enforce one system or the other. Either we use our law enforcement assets to continue the war on drugs or we use them to prevent cheating under a system of legalization. To me it's a no-brainer. Legalization will take far less money and manpower to enforce than the billions we are now throwing at criminalization, and it will be self-sustaining from taxes on drugs.

The first step in controlling the drug problem is to move it out of the shadows of criminalization and into the light of legalization. That won't end the drug problem, insofar as consumers are concerned, but it will do away with all the bloodsuckers associated with it. Once out of the shadows, we can begin educating users and, in time, cut down on drug use.
Damn straight
__________________
In the realm of spirit, seek clarity; in the material world, seek utility.
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz
Parihaka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 23:19 PM   #67 (permalink)
jame$thegreat
Senior Contributor
 
jame$thegreat's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-24-04
Location: Brooklyn, New York
Posts: 1,044
Country:
Don't get me wrong JAD I do believe in legalization and hope it happens but I just don't see how it can be implemented in a way that is completely practical. I think the first step is marijuana legalization, then we can discuss different methods of legalizing all drugs without prying and without rampant addiction and overdose.
__________________
Sometimes things dont end up how they should, a son, a brother, a mentor, a teacher, a cousin, a nephew, a grandson and a god in my eyes.

Who knows what he more could have been...

Christopher Muzykant

April 9, 1976-November 4,2005

My Brother, Always and forever
jame$thegreat is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2008, 00:13 AM   #68 (permalink)
JAD_333
Defense Professional
 
JAD_333's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-15-07
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,684
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by jame$thegreat View Post
Don't get me wrong JAD I do believe in legalization and hope it happens but I just don't see how it can be implemented in a way that is completely practical. I think the first step is marijuana legalization, then we can discuss different methods of legalizing all drugs without prying and without rampant addiction and overdose.
No problem. You might be right; start small.

I still like the NASA approach. We're going to the moon; now let's figure out how we get there. No one is sprung from the womb full grown.

You can dump the word "prying". It has to be voluntary.
JAD_333 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2008, 12:36 PM   #69 (permalink)
Tin Man
Contributor
 
Tin Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-02-07
Location: In the `shires.
Posts: 396
Country:
WHOOP de-do! The government has realized that kids at University do drink and drugs! The same agents that found that one out went to the same schools!

Kids will be kids. Some grow out of it. Sorry if I haven`t read through the thread but Jeez, get real! My days at Uni` were filled with hazy days of getting drunk, chasing girls and smoking myself to oblivion (only 6 nights out of seven!!).
Then I graduated and sobered up, how the hell I managed to do anything there is still a gargantuan mystery to me!
__________________
"Liberty is a thing beyond all price.
Tin Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2008, 18:22 PM   #70 (permalink)
jame$thegreat
Senior Contributor
 
jame$thegreat's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-24-04
Location: Brooklyn, New York
Posts: 1,044
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tin Man View Post
I haven`t read through the thread
Perhaps you should, it is an interesting debate, though no one was arguing whether or not college kid do/should use drugs/drink...
jame$thegreat is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2008, 21:47 PM   #71 (permalink)
JAD_333
Defense Professional
 
JAD_333's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-15-07
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,684
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tin Man View Post
WHOOP de-do! The government has realized that kids at University do drink and drugs! The same agents that found that one out went to the same schools!

Kids will be kids. Some grow out of it. Sorry if I haven`t read through the thread but Jeez, get real! My days at Uni` were filled with hazy days of getting drunk, chasing girls and smoking myself to oblivion (only 6 nights out of seven!!).
Then I graduated and sobered up, how the hell I managed to do anything there is still a gargantuan mystery to me!
I graduated in 1966...no drugs at the time, but kegs and kegs of beer, party, party, party and liberal sex...but the recent San Diego bust is about dealing, not so much about debauchery, as James pointed out. Yeah, it's a mystery how we survived and eventually became "pillars" of society...
JAD_333 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2008, 12:16 PM   #72 (permalink)
Tin Man
Contributor
 
Tin Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-02-07
Location: In the `shires.
Posts: 396
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by JAD_333 View Post
I graduated in 1966...no drugs at the time, but kegs and kegs of beer, party, party, party and liberal sex...but the recent San Diego bust is about dealing, not so much about debauchery, as James pointed out. Yeah, it's a mystery how we survived and eventually became "pillars" of society...
Guys, I will indeed read through the topic. Most of the weed dealers at my school were students themselves, God knows where they got it from. Some of the local indigenous low life's I think. It was rife and I went to a very good centre of learning! I stayed away from heavy stuff totally, never been my bag. Many "experimented", a few even got totally wasted and dropped out. I think that would have happened to certain individuals anyway, with or without drugs.

The majority of kids stayed clean and graduated. Alcohol was certainly a big issue, and just as dangerous in my opinion. One girl died from poisoning she drank that much, such a waste.

I graduated in 1991, there was a crazy music scene in the city, this definitely fueled things.
Where there is a need, the dealers find their target....Every time.
Tin Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pakistan's Role in State Sponsored International Terrorism indianguy4u South Asian Defense Topics 1 06-03-2005 06:47 AM
Pakistan: The State of Denial Ray South Asian Defense Topics 22 05-07-2005 08:47 AM
Tribal Warfare Gio Current Affairs 0 10-01-2004 23:40 PM
Scientology Creeps Into Public Schools themuffinman Current Affairs 4 06-13-2004 12:14 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:07 PM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8