![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board! The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today? |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#151 (permalink) |
|
Patron
|
So is it you Seasick?
I guess you do not realize the contributions of Mr. Lehman and what he has done for the Navy. You should back up your claim as to how Mr. Weinberger hated Mr. Lehman. Those two together were most influential to our military. They brought back competition, something that is now gone, Cost plus fee nightmares were out the window, the BOSS program was successful. There are many other contributions that Lehman and Weinberger gave to the DOD. Since Lehman and Weinberger, no one else has accomplished anything remotely to what they both did. Just about Everything has reversed course and that is why we are in the situations that are currently going on. Attack me all you want, that is I guess what you can only resort to. You seem to be able to dish it out, but certainly cant take it. I do look forward to debating with you, but you can save all the attacks though. Keep them to yourself. Do you have a copy of the NEJ article from 84? I am unsure of other studies other than the 3 750 KW considerations you mentioned. You have offered no valid explanation as to why re powering/upgrading can not be done. Last edited by SteaminDemon : 02-24-2008 at 16:02 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#152 (permalink) | ||
|
Resident Mythbuster
Senior Contributor
|
Don't know what this may have to do with the discussion, but hey, there you go : I've never been seasick in my life, but I tend to be terribly airsick, especially in choppers.
Quote:
) is nothing but a PIMP, and a CRIMINAL one at that. ![]() Donald Jones once told me he heard Weinberger say : "when I hear the name Lehman, I reach for my Colt" or something to that effect. ![]() Among many others, both Colin Powell and Donald Jones also had the greatest despise for John Lehman (spit, puke ).Quote:
) trolls. In any case, trying to *debate* with you is probably going to be a considerable waste of time...
__________________
Last edited by Shipwreck : 02-24-2008 at 17:15 PM. |
||
|
|
|
|
#153 (permalink) | |
|
Patron
|
Quote:
I have read post 145. So, it is not impossible and can be done. Shipwreck, I am not one of Stearman's trolls. About the seasick thing, It was in reference to someone on the Warships 1 forum. Was wondering if that is you. Well, about Lehman, he is no pimp or criminal. As I have said, no one since Cap and Lehman have even come close to their accomplishments. You should read up on Cap, Lehman and the accomplishments of those men. The pimps and criminals came around after Cap and Lehman. The criminal contractors had great despise for Lehman and Cap. Considerable waste of time? Think what you want. You pick and choose what you want and have not offered any real explanations to your posts. As to your avatar, have you been by the memorial on NOB? Last edited by SteaminDemon : 02-24-2008 at 17:35 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#154 (permalink) | ||
|
Resident Mythbuster
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
![]() Quote:
John Lehman (spit, puke ) is a CRIMINAL PIMP. Go back to posts #140 & #141. John Lehman (spit, puke ) should have been keel hauled for that.None of your business. Last edited by Shipwreck : 02-24-2008 at 17:55 PM. |
||
|
|
|
|
#155 (permalink) | |
|
Patron
|
Quote:
John Lehman should have been keel hauled? How about EUCOM and others associated in that debacle. Well, I guess all those people in the ship yards are idiots for cutting open ships for equipment removal when necessary. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#156 (permalink) | |
|
Resident Mythbuster
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#158 (permalink) | |
|
Patron
|
Quote:
One other question shipwreck. What was the dimensions of the single 750KW generator they were planning on? (of the 3 that were proposed) Can you please send me the May 84 NEJ article? Thanks Last edited by SteaminDemon : 02-24-2008 at 18:40 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#159 (permalink) | ||
|
Resident Mythbuster
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
Quote:
No, but you should be able to obtain a copy from ASNE (for about $5 ?). Last edited by Shipwreck : 02-24-2008 at 19:12 PM. |
||
|
|
|
|
#160 (permalink) | ||
|
Patron
|
Lasers and railguns, wouldn't that be nice
. Maintaining redundancy. That is the main reason. As I have said, you would only need to run 5 while underway, so that leaves 3 down. Plenty of room for any other additions they would wish to make as well. Quote:
Quote:
![]() |
||
|
|
|
|
#161 (permalink) | |
|
Resident Curmudgeon
Military Professional
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#163 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Contributor
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 9,361
Country:
|
Quote:
What is your opinion of the Mk 45 5" gun? Is it better to have a relatively slow 5" gun like this or a very fast 3" gun like the OTO super rapid?
__________________
"Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb. |
|
|
|
|
|
#164 (permalink) | |
|
Patron
|
Quote:
We are in so much better shape now more than ever the way you are talking, which in reality is not the case. The law that was passed as a result of the investigation was needed anyway. Cap and Lehman were not convicted though. How about the huge claims against the navy by Electric Boat, Litton and Newport News? That was the right thing to do and didn't rob taxpayers of their money right? John Lehman along with Mr. Skallerup built a litigation strike team which took the claims process and used it against the contractors. The contractors were practicing these "claims" against the Navy in their contracts for a very long time until Lehman sought to put an end to it. It was successful. If we would have left things the way the Carter administration was headed we would be building smaller non nuke CVV's instead of the Nimtz CVN's of which there were many critics. (first one commissioned by Ford). That was stopped by Reagan, Cap, and Lehman. Lehman played a major role in getting the money approved by congress for long lead items such as the carriers. 1979 was when it was implemented in the final defense bill. Carter was infuriated with the Nimitz Carriers and vetoed the entire defense bill to kill the aircraft carrier. John Lehman fought diligently to kill the CVV and replace it with more Nimitz carriers. He was successful and we can thank him and others like Senator Jackson and Senator Tower for the continuation of the Nimitz class carriers. Without going into any further detail, the military was left better off because of those in the Reagan administration. Morale and quality of training was a goal, and they were successful in that. The aircraft modernization and procurement was successful among many other things implemented by the Reagan administration. Things like tomahawk and all kinds of other projects may not have happened, or happened much later if it weren't for the Reagan administration. Cost plus fee no ceiling contracting nightmares were to be a thing of the past during the Reagan years, now they are the mainstream and the way of the future. So complain if you must, but like I have said, no administration has come close to the accomplishments of Reagan, Cap, Lehman and that is a fact. Yes, there were some unfortunate happenings along the way, as there is with any administration. Last edited by SteaminDemon : 02-25-2008 at 21:36 PM. Reason: fixed sentence |
|
|
|
|
|
#165 (permalink) | ||
|
Resident Mythbuster
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
) did during his tenure was to build castles made of sands, which fell in the sea, eventually. I was going to mention Vistica's book (Fall from Glory: The Men Who Sank the U.S. Navy ) but the review published in Airpower Journal pretty much sums it all up : Quote:
Last edited by Shipwreck : 02-27-2008 at 16:38 PM. Reason: added link to AJ Spring 1998 |
||
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| World Navies Listing (updated 3/29/05) | rickusn | Naval Forces | 10 | 04-26-2005 14:08 PM |
| World Navies(Completed) | rickusn | Naval Forces | 17 | 04-03-2005 01:27 AM |
| World Navies | rickusn | Naval Forces | 0 | 03-31-2005 18:57 PM |