The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark This Site


Go Back   World Affairs Board > Military Forums > Naval Forces > Battleships Forum
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 09-15-2007, 17:00 PM   #46 (permalink)
Kansas Bear
WAB Resident Historian
Senior Contributor
 
Kansas Bear's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-01-06
Location: Tornado Alley
Posts: 1,512
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shipwreck View Post
Some minor corrections :

1. The first Silkworm crashed in the water between USS Missouri and USS Jarrett, possibly deceived by chaff fired by the two ships.

2. The second Silkworm was detected on radar by a 17-year old sailor named Steven Bunbury on HMS Gloucester when leaving the coast 21 miles to the west.

3. The second Silkworm was briefly engaged by USS Missouri's 5-inch guns at near maximum range (10,000+ yards) when the when the missile crossed astern from starboard to port.

4. HMS Gloucester fired two Sea Darts and shot down the second Silkworm after it had passed beyond USS Missouri's engagement enveloppe.

5. The second Silkworm was struck within the engagement enveloppe of HMS Gloucester's Sea Darts.


Am I to understand that the RN's anti-missile systems have improved since the Falkland War? IIRC, a number of RN ships were struck by missiles..?
Kansas Bear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2007, 20:54 PM   #47 (permalink)
Gun Grape
Resident Curmudgeon
Military Professional
 
Gun Grape's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-12-05
Location: Panama City Fl
Posts: 2,566
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kansas Bear View Post
Am I to understand that the RN's anti-missile systems have improved since the Falkland War? IIRC, a number of RN ships were struck by missiles..?
Upgraded and deployed in a manner that did not hinder them picking up targets. Unlike the Falklands
Gun Grape is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Top Ten Chinese Military Modernization Developments oneman28 International Defense Topics 96 06-23-2008 01:49 AM
Battleship History Article rickusn Battleships Forum 3 01-17-2007 11:16 AM
Carrier killers (an article from JED online) lurker Naval Forces 172 12-28-2006 00:39 AM
Battleship Tactics Defcon 6 Battleships Forum 7 12-07-2006 09:10 AM
Principles of War for the Battlefield of the Future Ray The Field Mess 2 11-05-2006 10:42 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:32 PM.


Rochen is the web hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8