The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark This Site


Go Back   World Affairs Board > Military Forums > Naval Forces > Battleships Forum
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 11-28-2006, 14:29 PM   #151 (permalink)
Shipwreck
Resident Mythbuster
Senior Contributor
 
Shipwreck's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-07-06
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 2,075
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by M21Sniper View Post
The Des Moines were in service up until something like the early 80s weren't they?
USS Des Moines (CA-134) : decom 07/06/61, stricken 07/09/91.

USS Salem (CA-139) : decom 01/30/59, stricken 07/12/91.

USS Newport News (CA-148) : decom 06/27/75, stricken 07/31/78.
__________________
"Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called children of God" (Matthew 5:9)

Last edited by Shipwreck : 11-28-2006 at 18:30 PM.
Shipwreck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2006, 14:52 PM   #152 (permalink)
Shipwreck
Resident Mythbuster
Senior Contributor
 
Shipwreck's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-07-06
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 2,075
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by M21Sniper View Post
The Des Moines class had some very special 8" guns. (...) they were the most accurate (...) 8" guns ever mounted on any US (...) hull.
Like I said earlier (post #64 in this thread), the 8"/55 Mark-12/14/15 (bags) and the 8"/55RF Mark-16 (cartridges) had essentially the same dispersion.

Last edited by Shipwreck : 11-28-2006 at 15:21 PM.
Shipwreck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2006, 14:53 PM   #153 (permalink)
Shipwreck
Resident Mythbuster
Senior Contributor
 
Shipwreck's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-07-06
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 2,075
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by M21Sniper View Post
The Des Moines class had some very special 8" guns. (...) they were the (...) longest ranged (...) 8" guns ever mounted on any US (...) hull.
The 8"/55 Mark-12 and the 8"/55RF Mark-16 had the same max. ranges, i.e. :

* 30,050 yards @ 41° with the 335lbs AP Mark-21

* 29,800 yards @ 41° with the 260lbs HC Mark-25/26

On a side-note, the longest 8" NGF missions in USN service were fired by the Mark-12.

Last edited by Shipwreck : 11-28-2006 at 16:51 PM.
Shipwreck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2006, 15:17 PM   #154 (permalink)
Shipwreck
Resident Mythbuster
Senior Contributor
 
Shipwreck's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-07-06
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 2,075
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by M21Sniper View Post
The Des Moines class had some very special 8" guns. (...) they were the most accurate (...) 8" guns ever mounted on any US chassis.
The 8" M110 SPH (any version) actually had a MUCH BETTER dispersion than the 8" US naval guns (any version).

Last edited by Shipwreck : 11-28-2006 at 15:23 PM.
Shipwreck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2006, 15:29 PM   #155 (permalink)
Shipwreck
Resident Mythbuster
Senior Contributor
 
Shipwreck's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-07-06
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 2,075
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by M21Sniper View Post
If there were, suffice it to say that the accuracy of the 16" guns would be vastly improved.
Vastly ?!?! How much ?!?! What's your rationale here ?!?!

Last edited by Shipwreck : 11-28-2006 at 18:30 PM.
Shipwreck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2006, 19:24 PM   #156 (permalink)
Gun Grape
Resident Curmudgeon
Military Professional
 
Gun Grape's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-12-05
Location: Panama City Fl
Posts: 2,716
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shipwreck View Post
Are you saying that what the 5" popshooters did after February 7, 1984 was something they hadn't done before, especially at Suq Al Gharb ?

Or perhaps you're specifically referring to USS New Jersey, the typical instance the wrong tool in the wrong place at the wrong time IMO ?
What I am saying is that after 7 Feb all indirect fire support, was allowed to fire into places that had previously off limits. That being built up areas. The EXCEPTION TO THAT RULE WAS SaG. The only built up area prior to 7 Feb that was cleared for indirect fire.

While the Reagan Admin could say that firing into SaG in support of the LAF was within the standing RoE, everyone knew that was BS. It was a nice way not to have to go before congress (again) to justify the escalation or have the War Powers Act challenged.

It always pissed me off, that somehow Reagan (as the NCA) would allow us to fire rounds into SaG when LAF soldiers needed rounds, BUT denied that same fire support to a Marine patrol pinned down in east Beirut. On more than one occasion.
Gun Grape is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2006, 19:39 PM   #157 (permalink)
Gun Grape
Resident Curmudgeon
Military Professional
 
Gun Grape's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-12-05
Location: Panama City Fl
Posts: 2,716
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shipwreck View Post
The 8" M110 SPH (any version) actually had a MUCH BETTER dispersion than the 8" US naval guns (any version).
Apples and oranges.

The M-110A2 8" Howitzer with the M201A1 tube was the most accurate howitzer in the world.

But you are comparing a gun with a howitzer vice a gun with a gun.

Compare any naval gun with either the M-107 175mm gun or the M1918 costal Gun. You will find dispersion to be about the same. A little better because they were not fired on a moving,rotating axis(ship).

Guns are great for direct fire, A howitzer will beat them every time for long range, indirect fires.
Gun Grape is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2006, 19:53 PM   #158 (permalink)
ArmchairGeneral
Devil's Advocate
Senior Contributor
 
ArmchairGeneral's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-03-06
Location: The boonies of NC, USA.
Posts: 2,874
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gun Grape View Post
Apples and oranges.

The M-110A2 8" Howitzer with the M201A1 tube was the most accurate howitzer in the world.

But you are comparing a gun with a howitzer vice a gun with a gun.

Compare any naval gun with either the M-107 175mm gun or the M1918 costal Gun. You will find dispersion to be about the same. A little better because they were not fired on a moving,rotating axis(ship).

Guns are great for direct fire, A howitzer will beat them every time for long range, indirect fires.
So what makes a howitzer a howitzer? High angle fire? And what's a gun-howitzer? A long barreled howitzer? Or a gun that fires at a higher angle than usual?
__________________
"Apocalyptic thought is curiously pleasurable."
-Theodore Dalrymple
ArmchairGeneral is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2006, 20:09 PM   #159 (permalink)
Gun Grape
Resident Curmudgeon
Military Professional
 
Gun Grape's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-12-05
Location: Panama City Fl
Posts: 2,716
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArmchairGeneral View Post
So what makes a howitzer a howitzer? High angle fire? And what's a gun-howitzer? A long barreled howitzer? Or a gun that fires at a higher angle than usual?
A Howitzer is capable of firing both high and low angle fire and has a med velocity.

Gun-Howitzers are now just commonly referred to as Howitzers.

In the old days a Howitzer had a barrel less than 30 Calibers and fired high angle.

A Gun-Howitzer had a longer barrel and could fire high/low angle. What is commonly called a Howitzer nowdays since we quit developing "Howitzers" after WW2.

Does that exxplain it or did I confuse you even more? (I've been known to do that)
Gun Grape is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2006, 20:21 PM   #160 (permalink)
Shipwreck
Resident Mythbuster
Senior Contributor
 
Shipwreck's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-07-06
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 2,075
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gun Grape View Post
What I am saying is that after 7 Feb all indirect fire support, was allowed to fire into places that had previously off limits. That being built up areas. The EXCEPTION TO THAT RULE WAS SaG. The only built up area prior to 7 Feb that was cleared for indirect fire.
The question was whether after February 7, 1984, 5" popshooters did something they hadn't done before, e.g. whether they actually did fire into built-up areas after February 7, 1984.
Shipwreck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2006, 20:48 PM   #161 (permalink)
Shipwreck
Resident Mythbuster
Senior Contributor
 
Shipwreck's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-07-06
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 2,075
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gun Grape View Post
Apples and oranges.

The M-110A2 8" Howitzer with the M201A1 tube was the most accurate howitzer in the world.

But you are comparing a gun with a howitzer vice a gun with a gun.
Apples and oranges ?!?!

* the M110A2 with M106 projectile & M188A1 zone 9 charge has a MV of 2,510 fps and a max. range of ~25,600 yards.

* the 8"/55RF Mark-16 with Mark-26 shell has a MV of 2,700 fps and a max. range of 29,800 yards.

At max. range, the M110A2 actually had a MUCH BETTER dispersion than the 8"/55RF Mark-16, roll/pitch/yaw inherent to a NGF platform accounting for less than 25% of the difference.

Last edited by Shipwreck : 11-28-2006 at 20:54 PM.
Shipwreck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2006, 21:12 PM   #162 (permalink)
ArmchairGeneral
Devil's Advocate
Senior Contributor
 
ArmchairGeneral's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-03-06
Location: The boonies of NC, USA.
Posts: 2,874
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gun Grape View Post
A Howitzer is capable of firing both high and low angle fire and has a med velocity.

Gun-Howitzers are now just commonly referred to as Howitzers.

In the old days a Howitzer had a barrel less than 30 Calibers and fired high angle.

A Gun-Howitzer had a longer barrel and could fire high/low angle. What is commonly called a Howitzer nowdays since we quit developing "Howitzers" after WW2.

Does that exxplain it or did I confuse you even more? (I've been known to do that)
So howitzers have lower muzzle velocity and higher maximum elevation?
ArmchairGeneral is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2006, 22:00 PM   #163 (permalink)
Anon
New Member
 
Join Date: 08-03-03
Posts: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shipwreck View Post
Vastly ?!?! How much ?!?! What's your rationale here ?!?!
Take a M1A NM rifle and fire M80 ball ammo for grouping. Let it cool. Then group it using M852.

When you're done, you'll know what my rationale is.
Anon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2006, 22:03 PM   #164 (permalink)
Anon
New Member
 
Join Date: 08-03-03
Posts: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shipwreck View Post
Apples and oranges ?!?!
Yes, apples and oranges.

A gun's accuracy has far more to do with it's velocity or max ballistic range.

One cannot call a comparison of weapons where one is using WWII era ammo vs another which is using modern high tech ammo "fair", such as is the case when comparing the 16"/50 to the excellent SAI 155mm.

Unless they're a moron.

You a moron Shipwreck?

Last edited by Anon : 11-28-2006 at 22:05 PM.
Anon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2006, 22:08 PM   #165 (permalink)
Shipwreck
Resident Mythbuster
Senior Contributor
 
Shipwreck's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-07-06
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 2,075
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by M21Sniper View Post
Take a M1A NM rifle and fire M80 ball ammo for grouping. Let it cool. Then group it using M852.

When you're done, you'll know what my rationale is.
Are you somehow trying to say that there is no difference between your M1A NM rifle and a 16"/50 Mark-7 (calibers aside of course) ?
Shipwreck is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Trivia THL World Affairs Board Pub 3 07-26-2006 04:37 AM
Gulf War trivia 2DREZQ Naval Forces 7 04-24-2006 01:53 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:36 AM.


Rochen is the web hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8