Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Assange faces Swedish Prosecutor in London
Collapse
X
-
During his campaign, Trump declared “I love WikiLeaks!”, thanks to its repeated publication of Democratic party emails that proved highly damaging to his opponent, Hillary Clinton. Many supporters of Assange and Trump have called on the president-elect to “pardon” him when he assumes office.
Pardon him for what ??? , will obama pardon HRC when he leaves office ? if so ,why ,for what , Assange has not been proven do have done anything wrong , or has he , media rape trial , maybe , !!! HRC was proven to have been a nasty honeybunch over emails etc . Assange had better watch his back when he leaves his sanctuary , HRC will be out for blood . Inexile , yup eyebrows raised time , Strange ol planet huh .
-
Originally posted by tankie View PostDuring his campaign, Trump declared “I love WikiLeaks!”, thanks to its repeated publication of Democratic party emails that proved highly damaging to his opponent, Hillary Clinton. Many supporters of Assange and Trump have called on the president-elect to “pardon” him when he assumes office.
Pardon him for what ??? , will obama pardon HRC when he leaves office ? if so ,why ,for what , Assange has not been proven do have done anything wrong , or has he , media rape trial , maybe , !!! HRC was proven to have been a nasty honeybunch over emails etc . Assange had better watch his back when he leaves his sanctuary , HRC will be out for blood . Inexile , yup eyebrows raised time , Strange ol planet huh .
Comment
-
Originally posted by snapper View PostAre you for real or are you Donald Trump come a trollin'? Read the article; he is wanted for rape.
Comment
-
I am no expert on Swedish law but your appeal court upheld the warrant on him for rape; "After reviewing the existing investigative material and what the parties have stated, the Court of Appeal finds that Julian Assange is still suspected on probable cause of rape." If he has nothing to fear he should give a DNA sample but he refuses... why?
Comment
-
Originally posted by snapper View PostI am no expert on Swedish law but your appeal court upheld the warrant on him for rape; "After reviewing the existing investigative material and what the parties have stated, the Court of Appeal finds that Julian Assange is still suspected on probable cause of rape." If he has nothing to fear he should give a DNA sample but he refuses... why?No such thing as a good tax - Churchill
To make mistakes is human. To blame someone else for your mistake, is strategic.
Comment
-
Originally posted by snapper View PostI am no expert on Swedish law but your appeal court upheld the warrant on him for rape; "After reviewing the existing investigative material and what the parties have stated, the Court of Appeal finds that Julian Assange is still suspected on probable cause of rape." If he has nothing to fear he should give a DNA sample but he refuses... why?
Originally posted by FORMBY View Post....... Sweden has no legitimate cause for issuing extradition for him other than pressure by the US to maneuver Assange into a position (in this case Sweden) where he can be bundled out of Europe and into the hands of the Americans who want Assange's head for his work in Wikileaks. I have to say that I am surprised that you are not fully aware of the situation.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Doktor View PostBecause he is innocent until proven guilty, not the other way around.
Originally posted by FORMBY View Post"Våldtäkt" is a Swedish word that literally means taken 'by force/violence'.
Comment
-
Originally posted by snapper View PostThat is for the Court (and jury?) to decide. The courts have found that there is a prima facie case to be answered by upholding the warrant. He could resolve all and be free by simply giving a sample of his DNA. That is not pre-judging him but attempting to 'remove him from inquiries'.No such thing as a good tax - Churchill
To make mistakes is human. To blame someone else for your mistake, is strategic.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Doktor View PostBy the same logic, if they are this honest and are not hiding intentions to hand him to USA, why don't they guarantee him they wont?
Comment
-
Originally posted by snapper View Post'By force/violence' sounds like rape to me. Nothing to do with not wearing a condom...
Comment
-
Originally posted by snapper View PostWhether a request for extradition would be granted or not would depend on another court case and it would clearly be wrong to preempt the decision of a case that has not been heard. The point is though he has no need to go Sweden and could clear his name if he gave a DNA sample.No such thing as a good tax - Churchill
To make mistakes is human. To blame someone else for your mistake, is strategic.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Doktor View PostBy the same logic, if they are this honest and are not hiding intentions to hand him to USA, why don't they guarantee him they wont?
Comment
Comment