Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Afghanistan/Iraq and the evolution of the US military

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Afghanistan/Iraq and the evolution of the US military

    a question for formerly-serving/serving military personnel:

    wars have been the catalyst of rapid changes in militaries, doctrinally, technologically, and organizationally. well, we have been in afghanistan for almost a decade and in iraq for somewhat less than that.

    what significant changes/new capabilities have you personally noticed in the US military over the previous ten years? and do you believe that the difference to be as significant as say, earlier periods (1941-1951, or 1965-75)?
    There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there has always been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that "My ignorance is just as good as your knowledge."- Isaac Asimov

  • #2
    Astralis Reply

    "...what significant changes/new capabilities have you personally noticed in the US military over the previous ten years?"

    I've been away awhile now but it seems our networking capabilities have accelerated the push of info through all layers. That has to have developed into an important capability enhancement.
    "This aggression will not stand, man!" Jeff Lebowski
    "The only true currency in this bankrupt world is what you share with someone else when you're uncool." Lester Bangs

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by S-2 View Post
      "...what significant changes/new capabilities have you personally noticed in the US military over the previous ten years?"

      I've been away awhile now but it seems our networking capabilities have accelerated the push of info through all layers. That has to have developed into an important capability enhancement.
      You're very perceptive. Let me turn y'all onto a paper written by my commander (outgoing) and the New Guy (coming to us in July).
      Last edited by Bluesman; 05 Jan 10,, 23:47.

      Comment


      • #4
        Operating the Distributed Common Ground System: A Look at the Human Factor in Net-Centric Operations

        Comment


        • #5
          Dammit; Lt Col Grunwald's paper is a .pdf. It's 31 pages long, so I can't put it in a post. Mod, help me get this thang in here.

          Comment


          • #6
            Where's the link?

            Comment


            • #7
              Blues, if it's on your hard drive you can use "manage attachments" and upload it as an attachment
              In the realm of spirit, seek clarity; in the material world, seek utility.

              Leibniz

              Comment


              • #8
                Oh, and this, too:
                Attached Files

                Comment


                • #9
                  Here's Bluesman's link :)
                  Attached Files
                  “He was the most prodigious personification of all human inferiorities. He was an utterly incapable, unadapted, irresponsible, psychopathic personality, full of empty, infantile fantasies, but cursed with the keen intuition of a rat or a guttersnipe. He represented the shadow, the inferior part of everybody’s personality, in an overwhelming degree, and this was another reason why they fell for him.”

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by astralis View Post
                    what significant changes/new capabilities have you personally noticed in the US military over the previous ten years? and do you believe that the difference to be as significant as say, earlier periods (1941-1951, or 1965-75)?

                    Too many bullet-point presentations and video conferences.

                    Too many people with stars on their shoulders watching real-time UAV TV and chiming in with contradictory instructions.

                    Too many commanders not listening to or ignoring the advice of their guys on the ground.

                    Too many senior officers who think rank automatically gives them experience.

                    Aside from those petty complaints, I think some of the most significant changes of the last 10 years were levered in by Rumsfeld. He was initially on the right track by ramping up special ops, putting the emphasis on small, high-speed, low-drag units with terminal guidance capabilities. But, like a typical corporate exec, he streamlined from the bottom up, not the top down. When you do that, you end up top-heavy. Too many chiefs, not enough indians. It's a great thing having six guys on horse-back able to pull the chain and rain JDAMs down on hundreds of Taliban...but not so great when you have a 80 senior officers, politicians and their staffs telling the six guys on horseback what to do.

                    Are recent changes as significant as the earlier periods you mention? I don't think they can be compared to 1941-51, but I'd say they are more significant than the 65-75 decade.
                    Last edited by Red Seven; 06 Jan 10,, 16:55.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Here is wisdom:
                      Originally posted by Red Seven View Post
                      Too many commanders not listening to or ignoring the advice of their guys on the ground.
                      And this, too:

                      It's a great thing having six guys on horse-back able to pull the chain and rain JDAMs down on hundreds of Taliban...but not so great when you have a 80 senior officers, politicians and their staffs telling the six guys on horseback what to do.
                      It's like you read my mind.

                      We are embracing the concept of the 'mission-type order', and are revolutionizing Air Force ISR. Instead of a shopping list of MGRS coords and a 'fly the line' mentality, we are pressing the edge of the envelope on every mission, trying to maximize not only the tasked targets according to an intelligent, hard-eyed look at what's important and possible, but also on-the-fly, dynamically-tasked, end-user-requested targets that come up after the platform is already in the air and collecting. I do not exaggerate when I tell you that there are many Americans alive and many Taliban dead because we are letting captains and lieutenants listen to junior enlisted on when to turn the jet and go get a target that would never have been collected any other way.

                      And what you're saying is WHY this is just now happening. It should have been our paradigm all along, but the urge to control all aspects of every asset is a powerful drug, and its effect has been to make the most agile and flexible asset into a sluggish, unresponsive system. Well, we're making it into a WEAPON again, and I can see the future from where I stand.

                      GOD, I just LOVE this job.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        keith,

                        We are embracing the concept of the 'mission-type order', and are revolutionizing Air Force ISR. Instead of a shopping list of MGRS coords and a 'fly the line' mentality, we are pressing the edge of the envelope on every mission, trying to maximize not only the tasked targets according to an intelligent, hard-eyed look at what's important and possible, but also on-the-fly, dynamically-tasked, end-user-requested targets that come up after the platform is already in the air and collecting. I do not exaggerate when I tell you that there are many Americans alive and many Taliban dead because we are letting captains and lieutenants listen to junior enlisted on when to turn the jet and go get a target that would never have been collected any other way.
                        correct me if i'm wrong, but this seems like a capability we only got in the last 3-4 years, as more ISR assets/target order software became available. i remember my first visit to a DCGS (DGS-1) a while back; way cool. it's good to get out of the staffing world and see what operational is like.

                        on another note, this capability, on such a scale, is also way ahead of what any of our allies (let alone enemies) have. yet i doubt anyone in the general public has much heard of this...
                        There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there has always been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that "My ignorance is just as good as your knowledge."- Isaac Asimov

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          also, from the Army side, several big developments:

                          - development and field use of the Stryker, particularly the networking aspects and the day-night imaging; soon (if not already true) a commander will have better situational awareness buttoned up inside than with his head sticking out
                          - sped-up fielding of improved body armor; forces insurgents to move away from assault rifles towards heavier sniper rifles and the equivalent of a big muzzle-loading musket (the RPG).

                          of course, an increased appreciation for HUMINT, psychological warfare, and counterinsurgency.
                          There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there has always been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that "My ignorance is just as good as your knowledge."- Isaac Asimov

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by astralis View Post
                            keith,



                            correct me if i'm wrong, but this seems like a capability we only got in the last 3-4 years, as more ISR assets/target order software became available. i remember my first visit to a DCGS (DGS-1) a while back; way cool. it's good to get out of the staffing world and see what operational is like.

                            on another note, this capability, on such a scale, is also way ahead of what any of our allies (let alone enemies) have. yet i doubt anyone in the general public has much heard of this...
                            Forget the last 3-4 years; the biggest strides have come in the past 12 months. I have seen this place transformed, and I am as proud as Lucifer to have been a part of this - and I use this word with an appreciation of what it entails - REVOLUTION in ISR.

                            Go on back, because I can give you a tour guide that is as much a part of the hard turn as anybody. He runs the counterpart of my unit, here, the DART (DCGS Analysis and Reporting Team). You simply will not believe what's going on there, and here.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              keith,

                              I use this word with an appreciation of what it entails - REVOLUTION in ISR.
                              oh, i believe it, buddy.

                              the next 10-15 years will be even crazier, too; if you read the stuff the thick-glasses boys at AFRL and AFOSR are putting out, they're hoping by 2030 to develop micro/nano-UAV swarms that can be controlled by a single user, with the ability to potentially implant themselves in terrorists.

                              ooo-rah.
                              There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there has always been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that "My ignorance is just as good as your knowledge."- Isaac Asimov

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X