Hello friends, in light of several threads regarding war crims, I like to dedicate this thread on a single subject. Wether, you think the Emperor of Japan was a war criminal, not a war criminal, should have been prosecuted, was partialy responsbile, or that Emperor was not guilty but other Imperial family members should have been prosecuted.
As we all know the Tokyo trial were generally meant to seperate the Imperial familly and the Generals and Admirals.
As we all know the Tokyo trial were generally meant to seperate the Imperial familly and the Generals and Admirals.
Comment