there an overwhelming consensus among everyone without the power to change things that the royal navy is a disaster thats being made worse. If YOU had the power to change the navy, how would you improve it, what ships would you buy/decomm/modernize, (hint: try to use ships both British and other that actually exist, so its easier to understand.)
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
How to fix a navy
Collapse
X
-
Simple:Take it out to the closest large body of water and sink it and start over NEW however keep the subs.;)Last edited by Dreadnought; 19 Jan 07,, 17:49.Fortitude.....The strength to persist...The courage to endure.
-
keep the type 23 frigates
keep the new type 45s coming out
get rid of type 22 /type 44
keep 2 aircraft carriers
keep all subs
Build up a force comprising of the following
2x invincible aircraft carriers refit these and equip them with 9 F35's on each one (use these for forward deployment)
build the two new carriers HMS Queen Elizabeth and HMS Prince of Wales
equip with 50 F35 on each carrier
15 Type 23 frigates or update versions of
12 type 45 frigates
3 replacement for the trident subs coming into service in 2015 onwardsNaval Warfare Discussion is dying on WAB
Comment
-
Originally posted by STAN View Postkeep the type 23 frigates
keep the new type 45s coming out
get rid of type 22 /type 44
keep 2 aircraft carriers
keep all subs
Build up a force comprising of the following
2x invincible aircraft carriers refit these and equip them with 9 F35's on each one (use these for forward deployment)
build the two new carriers HMS Queen Elizabeth and HMS Prince of Wales
equip with 50 F35 on each carrier
15 Type 23 frigates or update versions of
12 type 45 frigates
3 replacement for the trident subs coming into service in 2015 onwardsCan the last person to leave the UK please turn out the lights
cheers Jeff
Comment
-
Originally posted by STAN View Postkeep the type 23 frigates
keep the new type 45s coming out
get rid of type 22 /type 44
keep 2 aircraft carriers
keep all subs
Build up a force comprising of the following
2x invincible aircraft carriers refit these and equip them with 9 F35's on each one (use these for forward deployment)
build the two new carriers HMS Queen Elizabeth and HMS Prince of Wales
equip with 50 F35 on each carrier
15 Type 23 frigates or update versions of
12 type 45 frigates
3 replacement for the trident subs coming into service in 2015 onwards"Peace through Power" Late Ronald Reagan
Comment
-
can someone explain to me why we cant renovate Invincible and bring her back? I personally like the idea of keeping all three Invincibles, 1 of them as a helio carrier(i dont see necessity to convert though, keeping as is allows more versatility) If all three stay in service, we will have 1 carrier, 1 light carrier, and 1 helicopter carrier active at all times, considerably better than the current 1 light carrierROAD WARRIOR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
sigpic
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dectilion View Postcan someone explain to me why we cant renovate Invincible and bring her back?
We could have retrofitted the 1st 5 Ticos with VLS. Or use that money to build a brand new Burke. Navy usually likes to go with more and newer hulls."Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb.
Comment
-
Take a lot of money from hard working tax payers, and tell some crummy iron workers to get thier asses on line...whip them hard...everything else will fall in line.
Its as simple as that!;)"To every man upon this earth, Death cometh soon or late;
And how can a man die better; Than facing fearful odds,
For the ashes of his father; And the temples of his gods."
Comment
-
Originally posted by gunnut View PostThere's not real restriction that you can't bring her back other than money. That money is better spent on building new ships.
We could have retrofitted the 1st 5 Ticos with VLS. Or use that money to build a brand new Burke. Navy usually likes to go with more and newer hulls.
Yes they should have took the first tico's. Even if they had to keep the MK-26 launchers. But too late now, they are deep sixed."Peace through Power" Late Ronald Reagan
Comment
-
Originally posted by Master Chief View PostYes they should have took the first tico's. Even if they had to keep the MK-26 launchers. But too late now, they are deep sixed."Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Dectilion View Postcan someone explain to me why we cant renovate Invincible and bring her back? I personally like the idea of keeping all three Invincibles, 1 of them as a helio carrier(i dont see necessity to convert though, keeping as is allows more versatility) If all three stay in service, we will have 1 carrier, 1 light carrier, and 1 helicopter carrier active at all times, considerably better than the current 1 light carrier
I've posted on a realistic re-model for the RN before but will do so again (just because I can't help it :) )
2 CVF - 27 JSF per hull, CATOBAR with the "C" variant of the JSF. 4 Advanced Hawkeyes, plus ASW helos etc. Wartime, able to carry far more JSF as necessary.
2 LPH - Ocean and Ark and then two larger two successors. Able to operate "B" variant of the JSF at need.
8-12 T45 (but re-fitted with a LACM capable v62 cell VLS (i.e A70), plus AsuMs, torps, Merlin capable, 155mm gun, Hangar mounted RAM launcher).
12 T23s with Sonar 2087
4 T24, basically a lengthened T45 without PAAMS/Aster 30, but with Aster 15 and LACMs, 155mm gun, 2 helo hanger plus flag capabilities (to replace T22B3).
Hangers retro-fitted to Bay class LSLs to make them multi-mission capable - acquire USVs to operate from them. Oh and buy 2 more them.
8 enlarged OPV(H) River class with increased endurance. Hangar to take two Flynx or 1 Merlin. Fitted with with 4.5 inch gun, 2*30 mm. Fitted for (but not with) torp tubes, AsuMs, 16 cell VLS, Sonar 2087. Able to carry a platoon sized EMF.
8 Astutes.
3 Astute variants with 8 VLS tubes for either a Trident successor or SLCMs.
The OPVs take up the jobs that frigates are currently performing, and do the single ship, presence missions. The enhanced and increased Bays give a greater versility to the RN and the T24's enhance the RN's deep strike capability.
An FSC program would eventually replace the T23's - and should be a large (9000 tonne plus) trimaran design, with an emphasis on ASW, land-attack, MIW and able to operate USVs, UUVs and have area defence AAW capabilities.
Comment
Comment