Fahrenheit 911 Debunked By 17 y/o Girl

[Lunatock]

Tubby Riefenstahl's Latest Propaganda Flick

[ChrisF202]

I love it when people of my generation fight back against the liberal hordes

[Confed999]

“If you hamper the war effort of one side, you automatically help out that of the other. Nor is there any real way of remaining outside such a war as the present one. In practice, he that is not with me is against me.”

Amen...

[visioninthedark]

If I were american, I'd be rupublican ... no doubts about that!

[Asim Aquil]

After watching this movie, I feel the whole world is just a chess board and the players are the democrats and the Republicans.

[feynman]

After watching this movie, I feel the whole world is just a chess board and the players are the democrats and the Republicans.

"I'm also not very analytical. You know I don't spend a lot of time thinking about myself, about why I do things."—G. W. Bush Aboard Air Force One, June 4, 2003

Good thing this isn't real chess. He'd be a pushover. lol

[ChrisF202]

If I were american, I'd be rupublican ... no doubts about that!

Can you please move to the US? That way we can have one more republican and one more vote for Bush

[Confed999]

Good thing this isn't real chess. He'd be a pushover. lol

The only piece with any power in chess, is the one that is on the attack.

[feynman]

The only piece with any power in chess, is the one that is on the attack.

A piece can have positional power w/o being "on the attack". Positional power is fundamental to chess. But that wasn't my point. It's that he isn't the brightest bulb on the tree. In real chess, which is what i was refering to, if you can't think deeply...bye bye. Also, Bushisms are funny.

[Confed999]

A piece can have positional power w/o being "on the attack".

You can't win without moving. One cannot check-mate one's self.

It's that he isn't the brightest bulb on the tree.

Who is? IMHO, really smart people aren't in politics, it doesn't pay enough and they have no private life.

if you can't think deeply...bye bye.

That doesn't mean the thought should take alot of time.

Also, Bushisms are funny.

Sure they are. I like all of the blooper type things. Not being a Republican or Democrat, I'm able to enjoy all of their goofy statements.

[feynman]

You can't win without moving. One cannot check-mate one's self.

Well of course. But if you are going to define attack so broadly, as any movement, there's no point in talking about it. However, defensive movement and offensive movement (which is what I meant by attack) are fundamentally different. Still, both involve positional power. That was my point about not only the attacking movements have power.

Who is? IMHO, really smart people aren't in politics, it doesn't pay enough and they have no private life.

Certaintly politics and chess are different which is why i repeatedly
said I was talking about chess. I agree...doesn't seem like there are a million bright people in politics. However, you must admit, if we are talking about intelligence, Bush is one of the least intelligent of any president we've ever had. Obviously this isn't the only quality you want in a leader...and you could debate exactly how important it is, yada yada, but it still is a factor since he has to make a lot of important decisions.

That doesn't mean the thought should take alot of time.

I'm not sure what this is refering to. I never attatched any temporal quality to deep thinking.

Sure they are. I like all of the blooper type things. Not being a Republican or Democrat, I'm able to enjoy all of their goofy statements.

I agree. I'm neither Republican nor Democrat either. I just want the best person for the job.

[Confed999]

Well of course. But if you are going to define attack so broadly,

Sorry, it's probably me. I hate chess, the lowliest piece can take any other just by moving first. It seems to me even the defencive moves in chess are agressive, or at least threaten agression. I see what you're saying though, hope my view is a little more clear too. ;)

Bush is one of the least intelligent of any president we've ever had.

I'm not sure about that. What is his IQ compared to others? Why is he dumber than Clinton, Bush 1, Reagan, Carter, Ford, Nixon, etc., etc.?

I'm not sure what this is refering to. I never attatched any temporal quality to deep thinking.

The quote you posted. ;)

I just want the best person for the job.

If that ever happens, I will be truly amazed. I don't see the right person for the job anywhere, and I would be willing to bet picking a random Social Security number and making them Prez would work out better than any of the choices presented. :)

[Donnie]

If that ever happens, I will be truly amazed. I don't see the right person for the job anywhere, and I would be willing to bet picking a random Social Security number and making them Prez would work out better than any of the choices presented. :)

please dont be mine

[feynman]

I'm not sure about that. What is his IQ compared to others? Why is he dumber than Clinton, Bush 1, Reagan, Carter, Ford, Nixon, etc., etc.?

Well, Clinton was a Rhodes Scholar (only 90 Rhodes Scholars are selected worldwide each year), Bush 1 I'm not making any claims
there...the apple doesnt fall far from the tree ;), Reagan...well whats
the difference what his IQ was when he was possibly ill during some of his presidency YIKES (that has been denied...but that wouldn't be a best thing to admit haha)! I've read some scary stories on that. Carter graduated in the top 10 percent of his class (Naval Accademy i believe). Nixon had an iq of 143.

Bush2...when he was at Andover he was an average student. He struggled in english and math and never made the honor roll. He got into Yale because of daddy. His grades were not good enough to earn him admission to the University of Texas Law School after his graduation from Yale.

Academic success/failure is by no means some absolute test of intelligence but there is a strong correlation. And of course there is also that gut feeling you get about his intelligence when you hear him speak lol But I won't use that as evidence :)

If that ever happens, I will be truly amazed. I don't see the right person for the job anywhere, and I would be willing to bet picking a random Social Security number and making them Prez would work out better than any of the choices presented. :)

Hahaha. I hear that. Maybe I should change my sentence from best person for the job to the lesser of two evils. Probably would be closer to the truth.

[Confed999]

Well, Clinton was a Rhodes Scholar (only 90 Rhodes Scholars are selected worldwide each year), Bush 1 I'm not making any claims
there...the apple doesnt fall far from the tree ;), Reagan...well whats
the difference what his IQ was when he was possibly ill during some of his presidency YIKES (that has been denied...but that wouldn't be a best thing to admit haha)! I've read some scary stories on that. Carter graduated in the top 10 percent of his class (Naval Accademy i believe). Nixon had an iq of 143.

Bush2...when he was at Andover he was an average student. He struggled in english and math and never made the honor roll. He got into Yale because of daddy. His grades were not good enough to earn him admission to the University of Texas Law School after his graduation from Yale.

Clinton lied under oath knowing he was going to get caught. Bush 1 and Reagan both made deals with really bad guys. Carter about flushed the country down the toilet. Ford couldn't walk straight without falling. The actual point is, depending on where you stand, Bush could be a genius, anyway, the other choice was Gore.