Who do you think is militarily the most powerful nation in Western Europe?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Most Powerful European Nation
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Not a valid question. The Europeans are so intertwained that it is impossible to seperate the postures. The Netherland's navy might as well be part of the RN (and their marines part of the RM) and their army is another div within the BW.
Without Germany, no one, not even the French can force project into Africa and the Italians are securing the Balkans from spreading.
Then, there is Turkey which has by far the largest military outside of Russia in Europe.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Officer of Engineers
Then, there is Turkey which has by far the largest military outside of Russia in Europe.
Reazzurro90 Posted: Jan 18 2004, 12:52 PM
Administrator Admiral
Group: Admin
Posts: 2,612
Member No.: 1
Joined: 8-June 03
True, but Greece is ahead in technology. I mean, the Turkish Air Force won't be enough against the Greek. Plus, the Greeks are getting EFs. Also, you can't forget that Greece has the support of the European Union, the Kurds and Armenia.
Even without the EU and Armenia, a Kurdish revolt would occupy a large part of Turkish forces' time.
Stupid, geography is still an important factor. And since Greece is in the EU, they HAVE to help Greece."Every man has his weakness. Mine was always just cigarettes."
Comment
-
Originally posted by Officer of Engineers
Without Germany, no one, not even the French can force project into Africa and the Italians are securing the Balkans from spreading.
at
Comment
-
I'm pretty sure he means project power and/or actually mount a campaign.Meddle not in the affairs of dragons, for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup.
Abusing Yellow is meant to be a labor of love, not something you sell to the highest bidder.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Trooth
I thought the French were in Africa at the moment? Please explain the "without Germany" bit."Every man has his weakness. Mine was always just cigarettes."
Comment
-
Trooth,
Aside from the other esteemed members mentioned, the Germans are backfilling alot of French obligations in the Balkans and providing support to the French in SFOR and KFOR. Without this support, the French would have to take their LOG trains supporting their African campaigns and committ them to the Balkans.
Comment
-
Aside from the other esteemed members mentioned, the Germans are backfilling alot of French obligations in the Balkans and providing support to the French in SFOR and KFOR. Without this support, the French would have to take their LOG trains supporting their African campaigns and committ them to the Balkans.
It will all get a little tenuous if you call that a depedancy, i thought that was part of the point of UN, NATO etc?at
Comment
-
The UN does absolutely nothing about backfilling. When an army's mandate is over with any UN mission, it leaves lock, stock, and barrel, and the next guy who comes in better bring his own kitchen sink because we ain't leaving ours behind. I certainly was not about to give the Nigerians any of my ammo nor my food and water out of my sqdrn's budget.
SFOR and KFOR are treaty obligations. That is France is legally committed to those missions. Africa is not. Thus, without German support, France would have a tough time living up to her obligations.
As it currently stands, France lacked the force projection to go anywhere else. Only four countries had committed brigade size forces to Afghanistan - US, UK, Germany, and Canada. Turkey and the Netherlands required joint efforts with Germany. It isn't as though that the French was unwilling after committing SOF and their naval air arm to the Taliban War and even contributed to the ISAF. It is because they can't.
Comment
-
I see. I wasn't suggesting the UN, NATO itself provides resources, more the UN provides the umbrella under which nations cooperate. I was under the impression that, one of the purposes, was so that the nation states themselves don't have to have treaty committments, it is that the likes ok UN, NATO do and the member states have to fullfil those roles on behalf of, say, NATO. So whilst the nation states have their own logistical problems, they can upsticks and have another nation backfill them.
But from your comments that isn't so?at
Comment
-
Force contributors to any UN mission can provide the logistical support, meaning transport. My battle group svc bn did help transport supplies to the Nigerians but no way in hell did we pay for those supplies, nor would it be from our stocks (ie, we ain't selling any to the Nigerians).
Wheras under NATO obligations, we can buy, borrow, and steal from each other (and often done).
The sole exception that I can think of is the USN who provided the logistical support and supplies to those missions, East Timor and Sierra Leonne, so that the US doesn't have to dirty themselves with those deployments. HCMS Protecteur was deployed to East Timor as the support vessel but the supplies were loaded in Australia and did not come out of Canadian Forces/Maritime Command's budget nor stocks. The same with the two C-130s we deployed.
I cannot think of any other mission, even Rwanda and Srebrenicia where force members left things behind for others to use.
I'm thinking back to my UNPROFOR days during the seige of Sarajevo. All my stocks came from my regt's holdings in Canada. I didn't use any of the BRITBAT nor FREBAT stocks though I do know that our sgts traded a hell of alot but that is not anything I should know about.
Comment
-
Re: Most Powerful European Nation
Originally posted by Praxus
Who do you think is militarily the most powerful nation in Western Europe?No man is free until all men are free - John Hossack
I agree completely with this Administration’s goal of a regime change in Iraq-John Kerry
even if that enforcement is mostly at the hands of the United States, a right we retain even if the Security Council fails to act-John Kerry
He may even miscalculate and slide these weapons off to terrorist groups to invite them to be a surrogate to use them against the United States. It’s the miscalculation that poses the greatest threat-John Kerry
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ironman
Good one Confed :)No man is free until all men are free - John Hossack
I agree completely with this Administration’s goal of a regime change in Iraq-John Kerry
even if that enforcement is mostly at the hands of the United States, a right we retain even if the Security Council fails to act-John Kerry
He may even miscalculate and slide these weapons off to terrorist groups to invite them to be a surrogate to use them against the United States. It’s the miscalculation that poses the greatest threat-John Kerry
Comment
Comment