Thread created.
I'll start with India. In my opinon because of Indias better infastructure near Tibet, India would be able to support a lot more soldiers compared to China. Not only that the IAF could also do more air lifts while the PLAAF will be limited on the number of aircraft, airbases and altitude problems. Thus InA could take parts of Tibet while PLA would be deployed on the defensive.
I'll start with India. In my opinon because of Indias better infastructure near Tibet, India would be able to support a lot more soldiers compared to China. Not only that the IAF could also do more air lifts while the PLAAF will be limited on the number of aircraft, airbases and altitude problems. Thus InA could take parts of Tibet while PLA would be deployed on the defensive.
Comment