Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

More Fun SBCT Articles

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • More Fun SBCT Articles

    These are letters to the editor of ARMOR magazine regarding the Stryker and the SBCT.

    Transformation Article

    Response to Above

    This is one is on a different topic and I was unable to locate the original articles but it is interesting.

    Stryker ATGM is Irrelevant?

    Thoughts and/or comments?
    Last edited by Wraith601; 06 Feb 06,, 06:06.

  • #2
    Originally posted by Wraith601
    These are letters to the editor of ARMOR magazine regarding the Stryker and the SBCT.

    Transformation Article

    Response to Above

    This is one is on a different topic and I was unable to locate the original articles but it is interesting.

    Stryker ATGM is Irrelevant?

    Thoughts and/or comments?
    Your first article was a broken link. The ATGM article is dumb. The 105mm is not designed to kill tanks. Thus, you need some kind of stand off capability. It's not super-potent right now, but a few years down the road when the HTAM or a similar CKEM is fielded, the said author will be signing from most high about the anti-armor capability of the ATGM.
    "So little pains do the vulgar take in the investigation of truth, accepting readily the first story that comes to hand." Thucydides 1.20.3

    Comment


    • #3
      It should work now.

      I agree with you on the ATGM company statement. Just wanted to start some discussion.

      Comment

      Working...
      X