Page 10 of 68 FirstFirst 12345678910111213141516171819 ... LastLast
Results 136 to 150 of 1014

Thread: No Fly Zone for Libya?

  1. #136
    Senior Contributor Dago's Avatar
    Join Date
    23 Feb 06
    Location
    San Diego, Califonia
    Posts
    1,037
    Quote Originally Posted by kato View Post
    The UK (Lockerbie) and the USA (LaBelle) do not constitute "the entire western world".

    From the German perspective for example, at the time it was far more important that Gaddafi organized on German behalf that the PLO didn't train RAF members anymore from 1979 on. Which resulted in an effective collapse of the 2nd generation of RAF within only 3 years. Hence why Germany supported Gaddafi for the next 20-odd years, including training of Libyan security forces by German ex-military contractors throughout the 80s and 90s.

    Coming back to the current situation, Germany might not necessarily vote in favour of a no-fly zone in the Security Council. If they do, they'll probably only do so in a possible bloc with the Arab League i.e. Lebanon and the African Union represented by Nigeria, Gabon and South Africa. In the hypothetical case that that bloc plus India - openly against - would vote against, that's just one vote short of the 7 needed to reject a resolution even if the P5 agree. Since Bosnia and Columbia will do whatever the US says anyway, it would then come down to Portugal and Brazil (which are ambiguous afaik). Yikes.
    Yeah, in which he also supported Carlos The Jackal. And there was a time, when he was involved with the red brigade. So, when I "speak for everyone", everyone bore casualties in the late 60's and 70's, including Germany. And wasn't the disco bombing in Germany? Your telling me no German citizens died, or German citizen casualties are not important? And no one should face justice for the killing of your country men?

  2. #137
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    05 Sep 06
    Posts
    2,099
    Quote Originally Posted by Dago View Post
    And wasn't the disco bombing in Germany?
    The LaBelle bombing was in Berlin, in the US zone, which wasn't a part of Germany (and not under German jurisdiction or legislation) until 1990. And yeah, no Germans or Berliners died in it either. The dead were two US soldiers and a Turkish woman. Eleven Berliners were seriously injured, 152 more lightly injured.

    Four of the five people involved in the bombing (three Germans, one Palestinian, one Libyan) received sentences of 12 to 14 years each in a German court ruling in 2001 and are all sitting in jail right now. The fifth, one of the two German women, was acquitted for lack of evidence. At least two of the perps - the other woman and her Lebanese-German ex-husband - were actually proven double agents of East-German domestic intelligence services turned by the Libyan intelligence.

    All non-US victims were compensated in a mutual settlement with Gaddafi in 2004, with the relatives of the dead Turkish woman receiving one million bucks, the seriously injured receiving 350 grand and the lightly injured 190 grand each.
    The US victims - the two dead and some eighty injured - were compensated by US court ruling and - irrespective of degree of victimization - cashed in a flat 8 million Dollar each in 2008, when Bush signed the Libya Claims Resolution Act.
    Last edited by kato; 09 Mar 11, at 01:20.

  3. #138
    Senior Contributor Dago's Avatar
    Join Date
    23 Feb 06
    Location
    San Diego, Califonia
    Posts
    1,037
    And you would be correct, but I would add...... the mastermind still remains free.

  4. #139
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    05 Sep 06
    Posts
    2,099
    Actually, the local groups were pretty free on their target decision.

    For the Berlin attack, there were five possible targets evaluated by the group: The LaBelle discotheque, a McDonalds restaurant, an US Military Base, a US Military Hospital and the American Consulate in Berlin. LaBelle was decided on as the easiest target to hit quickly (was actually only #3 on the evaluated list), since the attack was a direct reaction to the sinking of two Libyan ships by the US Navy ten days earlier.

  5. #140
    Senior Contributor Dago's Avatar
    Join Date
    23 Feb 06
    Location
    San Diego, Califonia
    Posts
    1,037
    Quote Originally Posted by kato View Post
    Actually, the local groups were pretty free on their target decision.

    For the Berlin attack, there were five possible targets evaluated by the group: The LaBelle discotheque, a McDonalds restaurant, an US Military Base, a US Military Hospital and the American Consulate in Berlin. LaBelle was decided on as the easiest target to hit quickly (was actually only #3 on the evaluated list), since the attack was a direct reaction to the sinking of two Libyan ships by the US Navy ten days earlier.
    Actually, kinda referring, on there material support, and direction of a Libyan dictator, that you think had nothing to do with any of it. And, also the bombing of airliners full of civilians. But whether they were sleepers or not, I was not arguing, nor the specific target. Or if Gadaffi spoke with them 2 minutes before the bombing and sending them flowers a few hours after. But more rather of there origin, finacial support, ideology guidance, and directions they were given to act as a proxy.
    Last edited by Dago; 09 Mar 11, at 02:40.

  6. #141
    Military Professional T_igger_cs_30's Avatar
    Join Date
    04 Jan 07
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    3,803

    Hague defends botched Libya mission

    The Times - Wednesday, March 9

    William Hague blamed a “serious misunderstanding” with rebel leaders for the botched diplomatic mission to eastern Libya as recriminations flew around Whitehall.

    The Foreign Secretary insisted that the anti-Gaddafi council in Benghazi had welcomed the idea of meeting British diplomats, as he defended his decision to authorise the operation. It ended with the two MI6 officials and their six special forces “bodyguards” from the Special Boat Service being withdrawn after they were detained for two days by armed Libyan farmers.

    Diplomatic and defence sources blamed the “mindset” of the special forces for surprising locals with a drop-off by helicopter under cover of darkness instead of deploying from HMS Cumberland in Benghazi harbour.

    However, other officials pinned blame on an intelligence and diplomatic failure for misjudging conditions on the ground. “We have not had our finest hour,” one Whitehall official said.

    Mr Hague said that the timing and details of the mission had been “decided by the professionals”, but added that he took full ministerial responsibility. The Prime Minister was aware that it was going ahead. Mr Hague told the Commons that he would shortly send in another team of diplomats, but “on a very different basis”.

    A poll for The Times today shows that there is significant support among voters for Britain to take a leading role in the Libyan crisis. Almost half back military intervention on humanitarian grounds and a clear majority support help for refugees regardless of their country of origin.

    In the Commons, Mr Hague was taunted from both sides of the chamber for the failings of the weekend mission. Sir Menzies Campbell, the former Liberal Democrat leader, said it had been “ill conceived, poorly planned and embarrassingly executed”.

    Douglas Alexander, the Shadow Foreign Secretary, said the failed mission raised further questions about Mr Hague’s response to events in Libya.

    Mr Alexander, referring to the night-time helicopter landing, said that voters would wonder, if new neighbours moved in next door to the Foreign Secretary, “whether he would introduce himself by ringing the doorbell or instead choose to climb over the fence in the middle of the night”.

    The Special Boat Service team took off in a Chinook from Valetta, Malta, in the early hours of Friday, it emerged yesterday. By the time senior government officials in London had discussed sending diplomats to meet the rebels, the team had already been detained.

    However, the Populus poll found that 49 per cent of respondents believe that Britain should be prepared to use military force to prevent foreign regimes from launching attacks against citizens campaigning for freedom. This compares with 45 per cent of respondents who were against such a measure. Liberal Democrats were least in favour, with 50 per cent opposed to intervention.

    The poll also found that a big majority supported Britain helping refugees, with 68 per cent in favour and 28 per cent against such a move. This effectively endorsed the mission last week by Andrew Mitchell, the International Development Secretary, to help refugees on the Libyan-Tunisian border.Britain also has an obligation to passport holders working abroad when their safety is threatened by political unrest, according to voters, with 86 per cent in favour and 11 per cent opposed.

    Mr Hague said that any no-fly zone would require “a clear legal basis” and support from the region.
    .................................................. .................................................. ..

    Diplomatic and defence sources blamed the “mindset” of the special forces for surprising locals with a drop-off by helicopter under cover of darkness instead of deploying from HMS Cumberland in Benghazi harbour
    bet even the "defence sources" were civil servants attached to MOD.

    “We have not had our finest hour,” one Whitehall official said.
    NO Sh*t.

    Hague told the Commons that he would shortly send in another team of diplomats, but “on a very different basis
    Rumour has it, the bodygaurds for the Diplomats will be John Cleese, Rowan Atkinson, Stehen Fry and Hugh Laurie............ if they do not beat them by making them laugh they will make better diplomats than we have got anyway.........
    <img src=http://C:\Documents and Settings\Wayne Smith\My Documents\002...My Pictures border=0 alt= />FEAR NAUGHT

    Should raw analytical data ever be passed to policy makers?

  7. #142
    tankie Military Professional tankie's Avatar
    Join Date
    22 Nov 06
    Location
    Barrow in Furness, United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,830
    At the mo i am watching PM's Q's and the house is full , except for Hague


    "When England was a kingdom, we had a king.
    When we were an empire, we had an emperor.
    Now we're a country

  8. #143
    Military Professional T_igger_cs_30's Avatar
    Join Date
    04 Jan 07
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    3,803
    Quote Originally Posted by tankie View Post
    At the mo i am watching PM's Q's and the house is full , except for Hague
    Miss his bus did he ?..............................
    <img src=http://C:\Documents and Settings\Wayne Smith\My Documents\002...My Pictures border=0 alt= />FEAR NAUGHT

    Should raw analytical data ever be passed to policy makers?

  9. #144
    Military Professional T_igger_cs_30's Avatar
    Join Date
    04 Jan 07
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    3,803

    Talk about Panic!!!!!!!!!!

    Name:  Hague.jpg
Views: 212
Size:  75.8 KB
    <img src=http://C:\Documents and Settings\Wayne Smith\My Documents\002...My Pictures border=0 alt= />FEAR NAUGHT

    Should raw analytical data ever be passed to policy makers?

  10. #145
    Military Professional T_igger_cs_30's Avatar
    Join Date
    04 Jan 07
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    3,803

    Un tough stand on qaddafi: Exception or rule?

    UN WIRE - Monday, March 7

    The U.N.&#039;s tough stand on Qaddafi: exception or rule? - By Colum Lynch | Turtle Bay

    For the first time, the 15-nation council's major powers had overcome their historic reservations about the Hague-based International Criminal Court (ICC) and joined in a unanimous vote to invite the tribunal's Argentine prosecutor, Luis Moreno-Ocampo, to investigate possible crimes against humanity perpetrated by Qaddafi's government
    The U.N.'s old guard, Cuba, Nicaragua and Venezuela have denounced what it is has described as a U.S. led plot to occupy Libya.
    the Obama administration's calls for regime change in Libya have fueled suspicions about American, British and French military intentions,
    <img src=http://C:\Documents and Settings\Wayne Smith\My Documents\002...My Pictures border=0 alt= />FEAR NAUGHT

    Should raw analytical data ever be passed to policy makers?

  11. #146
    Military Professional dave lukins's Avatar
    Join Date
    04 Jan 07
    Location
    cheshire uk
    Posts
    10,833
    Quote Originally Posted by tankie View Post
    At the mo i am watching PM's Q's and the house is full , except for Hague
    I love PM's QT...It's the best comedy on tv.

  12. #147
    rj1
    rj1 is offline
    Contributor
    Join Date
    19 Feb 08
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    695
    Quote Originally Posted by citanon View Post
    Your understanding of the situation seems to be quite far removed from reality.
    I live in the same reality as you do in regards to this situation.

    When the rebellion did occur, Army units were more often loyal to local tribal affiliations rather than any centralized command, which is why the Army melted away and then switched sides in the first place.
    Not everyone in the Army switched sides though.

    At best, this could be called a citizen's revolution or a tribal rebellion with military participation. So is it a tribal rebellion?
    At this point it's a civil war with tribes and soldiers on both sides. What the tribes and soldiers that are opposing Gaddafi have achieved is a by fact secession of the eastern half of the country.

    Look, it's best for all if Gaddafi is gone and I certainly agree with that logic. I don't understand why people fall back on idealistic bullsh*t instead of just being honest with themselves and call a spade a spade.
    Last edited by rj1; 09 Mar 11, at 17:28.

  13. #148
    rj1
    rj1 is offline
    Contributor
    Join Date
    19 Feb 08
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    695
    Courtesy of Stratfor:



    As the Libyan crisis enters its third week, the forces loyal to Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi and those affiliated with the newly created National Libyan Council in eastern Libya remain in stalemate. Though the line of control continues to shift back and forth near the oil export facilities around the town of Ras Lanuf, neither side seems capable of pushing through and defeating the other. The opposition has proposed a no-fly zone as a potential solution. The main problem for the countries being asked to implement one (the United States, France, the United Kingdom and Italy would be the main candidates), is that a no-fly zone would not do much to shift the military balance in the rebels' favor. Gadhafi's strength does not lie in the Libyan air force (it is in his conventional military), and the rebels do not appear capable of making any armored push across the desert first to Sirte, and then Tripoli, even were all the fixed-wing aircraft prevented from flight. There are other risks involved in implementing a no-fly zone, which would require first the bombing of Libyan military installations. Hidden anti-aircraft installations or surface-to-air missile sites could down foreign planes, collateral damage could create a public relations incident, and the situation could escalate to the point where getting out would become harder than initially conceived. This, of course, is to say nothing about the potential for unintentionally aiding a rebel force about which the international community knows little, other than the fact that the rebels are predominantly from eastern Libya and oppose Gadhafi's continued rule.
    Last edited by rj1; 09 Mar 11, at 17:36.

  14. #149
    Staff Emeritus
    Join Date
    06 Aug 03
    Posts
    24,170
    I would also like to point out that we have no independent confirmation of the casualties.
    Chimo

  15. #150
    Senior Contributor Stitch's Avatar
    Join Date
    14 Nov 06
    Location
    Patterson, CA
    Posts
    2,039
    Sounds to me like the main problem the opposition forces are having is a lack of leadership; if they can get their $hit together, they might be able to take Gaddhafi.
    Last edited by Stitch; 09 Mar 11, at 18:55.

    "Yeah. See, we plan ahead, that way we don't do anything right now. Earl explained it to me." - Tremors, 1990

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Demining the surf zone
    By sappersgt in forum Ground Warfare
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 17 Dec 10,, 05:54
  2. UK supports Darfur no-fly zone
    By Ironduke in forum The Middle East and North Africa
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 14 Dec 06,, 06:11
  3. Time Zone clocks
    By Shek in forum WAB Information Center
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 01 Apr 06,, 16:47
  4. War Zone Smackdown
    By Shek in forum The Middle East and North Africa
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11 Dec 05,, 17:44
  5. Giant goat survives war zone
    By Asim Aquil in forum International Politics
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 27 Aug 05,, 14:47

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •