ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > History of International Conflict > Ancient & Medieval
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 04-24-2008, 16:11 PM   #16 (permalink)
IDonT
Patron
 
Join Date: 06-13-06
Posts: 154
Quote:
Originally Posted by zraver View Post
I don't know why I forgot India but yes you are right. Population density favored the East.
This may help you

Military History Of Ancient India - All Empires



The Army of The Mauryan Empire
The Mauryan empire was the first empire that managed to unite all of India. This was partially because of their complex army structure. Like most ancient Indian armies, the Mauryan army had 4 types of troops- elephant (gaja), chariot (ratha), cavalry (turanga), and infantry (pada).

The army was broken into many units. The smallest unit was called a patti, and had 1 chariot, 1 elephant, 3 cavalry and 5 infantry. The elephant and chariot would typically be in the center with the cavalry and infantry surrounding them. Three patti made up a Sena mukha, and three Sena Mukha made up a Gulma. Other divisions were the Gana, Vahini, Pratana, Camu and Ani kini, each of which was three times as big as the one preceding it. The Aksauhini was composed of ten Ani kini, and was the largest unit in an army.

The Mauryan army had multiple Aksauhini's. The standing army had three-quarter million troops, one of the largest armies in the world at the time.
IDonT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2008, 17:04 PM   #17 (permalink)
Jay
Tamizhanban
Senior Contributor
 
Jay's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Location: Edison, NJ
Posts: 6,020
Country:
Not sure the AllEmpires website is right.

For instance,
Quote:
The core of the army was composed of Uttarapathian warriors, from central and western India. Uttarapatha had many militaristic peoples – like the Kambojas, Yavanas, Sakas and Vardas. Other peoples in the Mauryan army were the Maghadas, Assamese, and Cheras. Even the Nagas (literally serpents, because they worshiped cobras), a mystical people to the east, were incorporated into the army.
Yavanas are not exactly from the sub continent. Cheras are from deep south, they had nothing to do with Mauryan Army, as they were one of the 3 independent kingdoms in those times.
__________________
A grain of wheat eclipsed the sun of Adam !!
Jay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2008, 18:21 PM   #18 (permalink)
Cactus
Contributor
 
Join Date: 08-01-07
Posts: 544
Quote:
Originally Posted by IDonT View Post
This may help you

Military History Of Ancient India - All Empires

The Army of The Mauryan Empire
The Mauryan empire was the first empire that managed to unite all of India. This was partially because of their complex army structure. Like most ancient Indian armies, the Mauryan army had 4 types of troops- elephant (gaja), chariot (ratha), cavalry (turanga), and infantry (pada).

The army was broken into many units. The smallest unit was called a patti, and had 1 chariot, 1 elephant, 3 cavalry and 5 infantry. The elephant and chariot would typically be in the center with the cavalry and infantry surrounding them. Three patti made up a Sena mukha, and three Sena Mukha made up a Gulma. Other divisions were the Gana, Vahini, Pratana, Camu and Ani kini, each of which was three times as big as the one preceding it. The Aksauhini was composed of ten Ani kini, and was the largest unit in an army.

The Mauryan army had multiple Aksauhini's. The standing army had three-quarter million troops, one of the largest armies in the world at the time.
The article has liberally borrowed from history as well as myth (which could possibly be history, but should be qualified as such). This description of the Aksauhini is lifted straight from the Indian epic, the Mahabharata! (Jay, that should explain its disconnect with the actual political realities of the Mauryans).

Indians had stopped using chariots long before the Mauryans in the operational sense. A few chariots were used in ritual and ceremonial roles, but it is ridiculous to suggest that up to 10% of the force was chariots and no one noticed it!

In India, the peacetime army was mainly composed of mounted infantry/light cavalry; in the cities there were garrison troops; in the capital there was the imperial guard; and in the national forests were the war-elephants and heavy cavalry.

The basic composition changed dramatically in the wartime when 5 infantrymen (2 spear-men, 3 archers) were recruited for every 3 cavalry/mounted-infantry; and the elephants, the heavy cavalry and the imperial guards were also mobilized. It would in effect result in a classic ratio of 3:5.
Cactus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2008, 19:15 PM   #19 (permalink)
Jay
Tamizhanban
Senior Contributor
 
Jay's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Location: Edison, NJ
Posts: 6,020
Country:
Yeah, I was putoff when the article talked about military races and aryan invasion

Anyway, this is from Indika about Chandra Gupta Maurya's army..

Quote:
But the Prasii surpass in power and glory every other people, not only in this quarter, but one may say in all India, their capital Palibothra, a very large and wealthy city, after which some call the people itself the Palibothri,--nay even the whole tract along the Ganges. Their king has in his pay a standing army of 600,000 foot-soldiers, 30,000 cavalry, and 9,000 elephants: whence may be formed some conjecture as to the vastness of his resources.
To feed 9,000 elephants is no mean task

And this was for Asoka,
Quote:
The standing army was enormous: in Asoka's time, it consisted of 600,000 infantry, 130,000 cavalry, and 9,000 elephants attended by 36,000 men, together with many thousands of chariots and charioteers, all strictly controlled by six different boards of government.

Last edited by Jay : 04-24-2008 at 19:32 PM.
Jay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2008, 21:26 PM   #20 (permalink)
Cactus
Contributor
 
Join Date: 08-01-07
Posts: 544
Jay,

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay View Post
To feed 9,000 elephants is no mean task
The elephants, as well as some of the better quality cavalry, were kept on semi-free range. The imperial household and the top nobles kept a few score of those animals in regular stables for regular usage. The real bulk of the force was kept in semi-free state in national parks. There they worked as lumber-haulers, construction crews, and trained in combined arms. In the forests they could forage for daily food as they did their work, but were prevented from migrating by providing steady supply of salt and water (which are the main reasons elephants migrate) + of course other rations that made them stronger and healthier. The horses similarly had dedicated grasslands.
Cactus is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
British India Grundy Political Discussions 187 07-01-2006 07:39 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:16 AM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8