![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board! The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today? |
| View Poll Results: Who would be victorious? | |||
| Mongol Empire |
|
62 | 55.36% |
| Roman Empire |
|
50 | 44.64% |
| Voters: 112. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#167 (permalink) |
|
Patron
|
No, the Yuan (Yuen in Wade Giles) Dynasty was a Mongol-ruled dynasty. It was anti-Chinese in its ideology and barred many worthy Chinese from the ruling class.
The Song dynasty the Mongols destroyed, had, at the time, the world's highest iron output, was grossly innovative, and had an advanced proto-capitalism. One of the things is, the longer Chinese history lasts, the worse China becomes. It has an unparalleled history of environmental degredation; at the start of Chinese history, the lands that would become modern China had a biodiversity approaching that of the Amazon, but by the start of the Christian-era, rhinoceros armor became impossible, as the rhinoceros became extinct, and the treasure fleets of the Ming dynasty could not be replicated in the Qing, as the lumber resources involved had already been depleted. |
|
|
|
|
|
#168 (permalink) | |
|
Military Professional
|
Quote:
There are clearly lessons to be drawn from the study of Chinese history and possibly applied to todays global problems.
__________________
Semper in excretum. Solum profunda variat. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#171 (permalink) |
|
Regular
|
this page http://www.mapsofwar.com/images/EMPIRE17.swf is a good way to understand many things
__________________
Solon you Greeks will be for ever kids,you forget your history and you start all over again(Plato) |
|
|
|
|
|
#173 (permalink) | |
|
Contributor
|
Quote:
I usually play as the green faction(Brutii). This lets you conquer Greece and Egypt which gives you a lot of money. I'm playing Sudden strike : resource war now. The only thing i find odd is that for a resource war there is no concept of units being cut of from supply lines. Isolated supply units in some corner of the map can keep regenerating ammo/construction equipment and petrol. On the other hand it is just a game. You should try barbarian invasion which is an add on for rome total war. You can fight night battles. It's fun.
__________________
"Of all the manifestations of power, restraint impresses men the most." - Thucydides |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#174 (permalink) | |
|
Banished
|
Quote:
Mongolians when they were young practiced to shoot animals in the eyes from across large rivers. They have more horse riding, training then any other cavalry in the world and their arrows cut through thick metal armour like a chainsaw through cream. Mongols only had true difficulty against the Asians in terms of wars. Europeans were just scraps of meat. Iranian/russia/east europe fell in few few years but it took mongols nearly 100years to defeat china. And even when they did capture song, the ruler was so pro chinese he moved the mongol capital to china and made chinese the official language. Mongolians also sufferered hundreds of thousands of casualties against Japan. More then a quarter of a million men lost against korea. They never managed to capture vietnam after hundreds of thousands of dead soldiers. Mongols were powerful and effective but mainly only against european metal hunks and scarf wearing middle easterners. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#175 (permalink) | |
|
Military Professional
Moderator Scotch taster |
Quote:
Oh come on, enough of the propaganda!
__________________
Chimo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#176 (permalink) | |
|
WAB Resident Historian
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
'Ayn Jalut (September 8, 1260) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#177 (permalink) | ||
|
A Self Important
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
Quote:
And their arrow shooting was hardly super human.
__________________
To sit down with these men and deal with them as the representatives of an enlightened and civilized people is to deride ones own dignity and to invite the disaster of their treachery - General Matthew Ridgway Last edited by troung : 03-12-2008 at 13:54 PM. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#178 (permalink) |
|
Military Professional
|
However their organization was exceptional. My vote is for the Mongols, because militarily their ability to perform on the battlefield (the combination of discipline and control) was pretty much unmatched. However they were incapable of constructing a lasting empire because their society was a loosely clan based structure that occasionally came together around one man.
Rome would have been smashed on the battlefield, however within a man's lifetime whatever the Mongols had erected in Rome's place would crumble. |
|
|
|
|
|
#179 (permalink) | ||
|
A Self Important
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#180 (permalink) |
|
Banished
|
Shall i quote you on the hundreds of battles the mongols won against superior opponents?
That battle had the Mongols out numbered, fighting in enemy territory and fighting against a bunch of bandit mongols. By then the Mongol empire was already split into four smaller nations. Compare the mongols under subudei with the legions under julius caesar and the Mongols would still win even if they are outnumbered 10:1. Mongols have the advantage of speed which allows them to pester the enemy, destroy their food supply, scare the enemy and force them not to sleep or just running away at will. Their small horses were particularly designed for stamina, endurance and speed. Plus they would have used Chinese siege weapons and explosives on the metal hunks. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Geographic Catalysts for Secularization in Western Europe | Ironduke | The Staff College | 36 | 05-07-2007 03:57 AM |
| The Greatest Empire | scotsboyuk | General History | 188 | 02-07-2007 16:16 PM |
| The Fall Of Rome? | Ironside | Ancient & Medieval | 61 | 05-25-2006 21:47 PM |
| Destroying Baghdad | sparten | Warfare in the Modern Age | 9 | 02-20-2006 16:22 PM |
| Are our Soldiers incompetent? | giggs88 | The Western Alliance | 104 | 12-28-2005 23:31 PM |