Closed Thread
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 46

Thread: 1421 & 1434 Columbus discovered America?

  1. #16
    Military Professional DragoonGuard's Avatar
    Join Date
    08 Jun 09
    Location
    Brasil, Africa, Scotland.
    Posts
    511
    Country: Scotland
    Quote Originally Posted by zraver View Post
    I'd rather read the reviews by accredited historians grounded in the historical method with free access to the best databases and with other peer accepted historians on in their cellphone phonebook.

    Those people, the professionals with access to the best resources say the guy is a quack. His maps have been revealed as forgeries and his claims are for the most part unsupported by anything but other unsupported work.
    The best data bases contain everything that Menzies has put together.

    Its just that the Academics (as usual) will never diverge from historical dogma.


    You must be one of these people who think the bible is factual in some way.

    You are, aren't you.

  2. #17
    Military Professional DragoonGuard's Avatar
    Join Date
    08 Jun 09
    Location
    Brasil, Africa, Scotland.
    Posts
    511
    Country: Scotland
    Quote Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
    What I am trying to tell you is that Zheng Hi's contact with the new world was absolutely minimal and certainly would not have explored the interior of the Americas which is the only way the map could have been made, ie having explored it in person.

    He never brought home Aztec or Mayan gold but he did bring home African gold. And if he did visit the interior, he would have spread plague much like the Spaniards did centuries later.

    Most certainly, his ships were full of rats, themselves were germ carriers. So, even if Zheng He did not visit the interior, his rats would have done the deed all the same.

    Contact between the Old World and the New World was a disaster for the people of the New World. The best example that Zheng He did not visit the new world is that no one blames him for the die off when the Spaniards came.
    'most certainly his ships were full of rats' ?

    Their junks were full of plants/herbs/dogs (food)/ Rats? doubt it, they were that good at kiting out a vessel for long voyages. They grew their own herbs aboard ship.
    Thats why their men never suffered from the likes of scurvy, or any other type of vitamin deficiency, - These people were hundreds of years ahead of anybody else on the planet at this time.

    These guys did not go deep in to where they landed, - They were too busy mapping the globe. Their objective was to make contact with every/any/all kindoms on the planet, and oblige them to trade with China.

  3. #18
    Administrator Tarek Morgen's Avatar
    Join Date
    08 Feb 07
    Location
    Kassel
    Posts
    4,097
    Country: Germany
    right now there is only one person that defends a certain books against all common sense, and said person is not zraver..

    There have been several rational arguments against the claim that China discovered America, you failed to disprove a single one of them and instead attack those who dare to disagree...so tell me..why did you open this thread? Clearly not to discuss the book, since you are apparrantly unable to do so in any serious manner..

    edit: when they did not go too deep..how did they get details from the INTERIOR?

    And how could they draw a map in the year 1418 that included a continent that they, as you claim, discovered 1421???
    uh I might be wrong


  4. #19
    Staff Emeritus
    Join Date
    06 Aug 03
    Posts
    21,433
    Country: Canada
    Quote Originally Posted by DragoonGuard View Post
    Their junks were full of plants/herbs/dogs (food)/ Rats? doubt it,
    It was not intentional. Rats have a way of finding holes to hide in on ships.

    Quote Originally Posted by DragoonGuard View Post
    These guys did not go deep in to where they landed, - They were too busy mapping the globe. Their objective was to make contact with every/any/all kindoms on the planet, and oblige them to trade with China.
    Zheng Hi fought wars. And if there is one thing that he was obliged to bring home was silver and gold - to pay for the fleet.
    Chimo

  5. #20
    Staff Emeritus
    Military Professional
    Contrary by Nature.
    zraver's Avatar
    Join Date
    22 Oct 06
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    9,269
    Country: United States
    Quote Originally Posted by DragoonGuard View Post
    The best data bases contain everything that Menzies has put together.
    If it did he would not be using forgeries.

    Its just that the Academics (as usual) will never diverge from historical dogma.
    Really, you don't know much about the revisionist school. Not the type of revision of your guy, but the school that is seeking out and recording the history of the other side which produces a more complete view than the Euro-centric versions of the past.

    You must be one of these people who think the bible is factual in some way.

    You are, aren't you.
    In fact much of the bible has been proven as a factual retelling of the actual times involved dealing with multiple ancient empires, their breadth and manner and other things of historical significance. As history the bible is very accurate in some areas.

  6. #21
    Dirty Kiwi Parihaka's Avatar
    Join Date
    10 Nov 04
    Posts
    15,723
    Country: New Zealand
    Quote Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
    What I am trying to tell you is that Zheng Hi's contact with the new world was absolutely minimal and certainly would not have explored the interior of the Americas which is the only way the map could have been made, ie having explored it in person.

    He never brought home Aztec or Mayan gold but he did bring home African gold. And if he did visit the interior, he would have spread plague much like the Spaniards did centuries later.

    Most certainly, his ships were full of rats, themselves were germ carriers. So, even if Zheng He did not visit the interior, his rats would have done the deed all the same.

    Contact between the Old World and the New World was a disaster for the people of the New World. The best example that Zheng He did not visit the new world is that no one blames him for the die off when the Spaniards came.
    Ah science. Game, set, match.

  7. #22
    Senior Contributor Triple C's Avatar
    Join Date
    11 Apr 06
    Location
    Chicago IL
    Posts
    1,686
    Country: Taiwan
    Gavin Menzies is a hack and a known forger of evidences and documents. His last great archeological discovery was Chinese stone anchors he collected in the sea beds near California which he claims to have originated from Ming China. Of course, a more historically minded scholar would point out that in the nineteenth century California was teeming with Chinese emigrants, many of them subsequently took to the seas. Coincidentally, the anchors he found was of the nineteenth-century style. He also discovered a Chinese map that he used to buttress his thesis, which turned out to be something drawn by the Jesuits during Qing Dynasty. Ouch!

    No one has successfully found any document or inscription in China that celebrates the discovery of a new continent. What the Confucian literati destroyed during the purge of the eunuchs were state archives and plenty of histories from other sources remain to refute Menzie's claims. Zheng He left in his ancestral shrine a stone monument commemorating his adventures at sea, with a long inscription of what his deeds and what he had seen, yet none of the exotic lands described in the inscription matched America.

    Menzies's experience with submarines bears no relevance to his knowledge of seafaring in wooden ships by wind. An obvious problem with his theory is that Chinese junks sail by monsoon, their exclusive use of the square sail limiting them to sail only with not against the wind. There is no monsoon wind powerful enough to move ships in the western hemisphere. To reach America without contradicting the timetable of Zheng He's expedition, the junk fleet must complete a super humanly speedy journey westwards around the contours of Africa under gales lethal to ships without keels. If Zheng He pushed through, his fleet would have suffered crippling losses and there would be both documentary evidence and shipwrecks. Menzies had failed to found any.

    And by the way... I read the book. And it took me two years to forget that rubbish. It's one of the only books I have voluntarily thrown away.
    Last edited by Triple C; 06 Jul 09, at 10:09.
    All those who are merciful with the cruel will come to be cruel to the merciful.
    -Talmud Kohelet Rabbah, 7:16.

  8. #23
    Military Professional DragoonGuard's Avatar
    Join Date
    08 Jun 09
    Location
    Brasil, Africa, Scotland.
    Posts
    511
    Country: Scotland
    Why does everybody want to trash Menzies?

    Its not like China is going to lay claim to anywhere is it?

    Might be a crap thread, but its got entertainment value........Sorry for bringing back the memory of it BTW.
    Last edited by DragoonGuard; 06 Jul 09, at 14:12.

  9. #24
    Patron
    Join Date
    03 Dec 06
    Location
    London, England
    Posts
    278
    Country: United Kingdom
    The Vikings went to North America long before all of this. They just didn't really leave their mark or make a big deal about it, the same goes to any other group of people that went to the Americas before Columbus. The reason history credits it to Columbus and the Portugese/Spanish is because they're the one's that actually started to do something with their discovery.

  10. #25
    Military Professional DragoonGuard's Avatar
    Join Date
    08 Jun 09
    Location
    Brasil, Africa, Scotland.
    Posts
    511
    Country: Scotland
    Its the far East,Austrailia, Newzeland, and what was all charted in the pacific by the Chinese that is most interesting.

  11. #26
    Administrator
    Lei Feng Protege
    Defense Professional
    Join Date
    23 Aug 05
    Location
    Arlington, VA
    Posts
    8,843
    Country: United States
    dragoon,

    as someone whom has read the book and has an academic/working background in china, i ask you, why do you put so much faith in a book that's the equivalent to the Da Vinci Code?
    The human mind cannot grasp the causes of phenomena in the aggregate. But the need to find these causes is inherent in man’s soul. And the human intellect, without investigating the multiplicity and complexity of the conditions of phenomena, any one of which taken separately may seem to be the cause, snatches at the first, the most intelligible approximation to a cause, and says: “This is the cause!"

    -Leo Tolstoy
    War and Peace

  12. #27
    Military Professional DragoonGuard's Avatar
    Join Date
    08 Jun 09
    Location
    Brasil, Africa, Scotland.
    Posts
    511
    Country: Scotland
    Faith? - Just an open mind. I suppose not being American also makes me less bias too. (given the subject)

  13. #28
    Administrator
    Lei Feng Protege
    Defense Professional
    Join Date
    23 Aug 05
    Location
    Arlington, VA
    Posts
    8,843
    Country: United States
    dragoon,

    I suppose not being American also makes me less bias too. (given the subject)
    how so? i'm taiwanese-american with a background in chinese studies/history, and it's clear just by looking at the footnotes how sketchy his evidence is.

    you mention how academics ignore the book from historical "dogma" alone-- one thing you should know about the academic community is that there's not really a "dogma". the academic community, especially on something so subjective as a social science, is riven by factions and personalities, particularly as everyone seeks the next hot interpretation that means a research grant or a fellowship chair. that means there is an enormous pressure for academics to refine and improve old ideas, or better yet, overturn them.

    that no serious academic group has coalensced around menzies' thoughts, which are controversial to say the least, shows how weak his arguments are.
    The human mind cannot grasp the causes of phenomena in the aggregate. But the need to find these causes is inherent in man’s soul. And the human intellect, without investigating the multiplicity and complexity of the conditions of phenomena, any one of which taken separately may seem to be the cause, snatches at the first, the most intelligible approximation to a cause, and says: “This is the cause!"

    -Leo Tolstoy
    War and Peace

  14. #29
    Patron
    Join Date
    10 Apr 09
    Posts
    185
    Country: United States
    Quote Originally Posted by DragoonGuard View Post
    You 'read up on this' Where? the two bollocks URL's you just pasted?

    LMAO!
    no need to be so defensive . I merely did a cursory search on the book as it was a quite surprising theory to me. I read about the gist of it, read the criticisms, and agreed with the criticisms and left it at that. If those criticisms I read are not valid, than why is his work considered unreliable at best by the scientific community? It is up to him to prove his theory, and he has yet to do so. That he is now bringing up a seperate theory on China being the catalyst for the beginning of the Rennaissance or something by visiting the pope without getting the community to accept his first theory of China sailing to America first does not bode well for him in my book.


    You surely understand these days that just saying "internet website lol", calling them crap, and dismissing them does not automatically mean the information on them is without merit. Perhaps you could explain why I should rather read the author than the multiple criticisms of his book(s) to determine how valid he is?
    Last edited by diablo49; 07 Jul 09, at 04:21.

  15. #30
    Military Professional DragoonGuard's Avatar
    Join Date
    08 Jun 09
    Location
    Brasil, Africa, Scotland.
    Posts
    511
    Country: Scotland
    'Gist'?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. America will lose the war in Iraq!
    By lulldapull in forum The Middle East and North Africa
    Replies: 182
    Last Post: 30 Nov 04,, 05:32
  2. Dr. Henry Kissinger on Indo-US Relations
    By Hari_Om in forum Europe and Russia
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 17 Nov 04,, 05:05
  3. 36 Ways the US Is Losing the War on Terror
    By lulldapull in forum Operation Enduring Freedom and Af-Pak
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 06 Nov 04,, 18:09
  4. Defiant Saddam appears in court
    By Ironduke in forum International Economy
    Replies: 71
    Last Post: 20 Aug 04,, 15:14
  5. The Happy Part of America
    By Leader in forum International Economy
    Replies: 56
    Last Post: 26 Jun 04,, 17:51

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts