Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 38

Thread: Tsarist Russia and the Ottoman Empire

  1. #1
    Regular
    Join Date
    02 Oct 07
    Posts
    45

    Tsarist Russia and the Ottoman Empire

    I wish to start a thread on the history of the Tsarist Russian Empire and its traditional enemy the Ottoman Empire. They had been in religous conflict for centuries and led to such wars as the Crimean War and the Caucasus campaign of the First World War.

    I invite as people people as possible to share their knowledge on this very interesting topic, both historically and how it affects the world today.

  2. #2
    Regular ahmet's Avatar
    Join Date
    23 Oct 06
    Location
    Ankara
    Posts
    73
    What I know is there were no real religious conflict between them. The real conflict comes from Russia's desire to reach southern seas. Tsarist Russia just didn't make it clear and when Ottoman started to lose their power, she used religion when waging war against Ottoman. Russia was just searching for an excuse for a war.
    Time is an ocean in a storm

  3. #3
    Regular
    Join Date
    02 Oct 07
    Posts
    45
    So Tsarist Russia was using religion as an excuse for territoral expansion

  4. #4
    Staff Emeritus
    Military Professional
    Contrary by Nature.
    zraver's Avatar
    Join Date
    22 Oct 06
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    11,551
    Quote Originally Posted by ahmet View Post
    What I know is there were no real religious conflict between them. The real conflict comes from Russia's desire to reach southern seas. Tsarist Russia just didn't make it clear and when Ottoman started to lose their power, she used religion when waging war against Ottoman. Russia was just searching for an excuse for a war.
    Not entirely true, the Romanovs were at least tangentially related to the last of the Byzantine Emperors, and through them to the heritage of Rome. This gave them a claim on the city of Constantinople

  5. #5
    Regular ahmet's Avatar
    Join Date
    23 Oct 06
    Location
    Ankara
    Posts
    73
    Quote Originally Posted by great one View Post
    So Tsarist Russia was using religion as an excuse for territoral expansion
    Yes, that's right. Several times Ottoman is blamed for not caring for non-Muslims' rights in Ottoman lands most of which are resulted in Russian-Ottoman wars.

    Also, what zraver told must be true. Though it comes as a secondary reason. Even if it wasn't for the heritage, Russia would want to capture southern lands, so that they could control the profitable Mediterranean trade.
    Time is an ocean in a storm

  6. #6
    Padishah Shahanshah Senior Contributor xerxes's Avatar
    Join Date
    23 Jan 07
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,441
    I am reading a book by professor Quigly, he has a good chapter about Russia and its origin. Whenever, I have time I will try to post some of his views. They were intresting.
    If we contrast the rapid progress of this mischievous discovery of gunpowder with the slow and laborious advances of reason, science, and the arts of peace, a philosopher, according to his temper, will laugh or weep at the folly of mankind. - Edward Gibbon

  7. #7
    Former Staff Senior Contributor Ironduke's Avatar
    Join Date
    02 Aug 03
    Location
    Arlington, Virginia
    Posts
    10,132
    Quote Originally Posted by ahmet View Post
    What I know is there were no real religious conflict between them. The real conflict comes from Russia's desire to reach southern seas. Tsarist Russia just didn't make it clear and when Ottoman started to lose their power, she used religion when waging war against Ottoman. Russia was just searching for an excuse for a war.
    Both empires expanded and eventually met. The first conflict occurred after the Russian conquest of the Khanate of Astrakhan, upon which the Turks tried to reverse the Russian conquest by besieging and blockading the Russians. The funny thing about conquest it seems to make necessary further conquests for "security". Like how the road to India was "threatened" by anybody else holding Palestine, Arabia, and Iraq, and how it was deemed necessary to intervene in Persia and Afghanistan to protect India from the Russians.

    The Russians did view themselves as the successors of the Byzantine Empire, as there was extensive intermarriage and the niece of the last Byzantine Emperor was married to Ivan III, and used that argue themselves as having legitimate interests in those regions as the only surviving Orthodox state. During the 16th-17th centuries, most of the people in the Ottoman Empire were Orthodox, but it's more of an excuse to intervene.

    The whole religion argument is more of a tool that was employed to achieve means such as expanding holdings, power, wealth, whether by the Ottomans or the Russians. The Ottomans claimed to be seeking rights to the wrongs inflicted by the Russians against the former khanates along the Black Sea in the early conflicts, and the Russians used the same argument with regards to their co-religionists in southeastern Europe and the Middle East.

  8. #8
    Regular ahmet's Avatar
    Join Date
    23 Oct 06
    Location
    Ankara
    Posts
    73
    Quote Originally Posted by Ironduke View Post
    ...During the 16th-17th centuries, most of the people in the Ottoman Empire were Orthodox, but it's more of an excuse to intervene.

    The whole religion argument is more of a tool that was employed to achieve means such as expanding holdings, power, wealth, whether by the Ottomans or the Russians....
    Agreed, the politics is the sharing of wealth and ideology is the tool to realize it.
    Last edited by ahmet; 16 Nov 08, at 11:05. Reason: quotation box
    Time is an ocean in a storm

  9. #9
    Regular
    Join Date
    02 Oct 07
    Posts
    45
    You know the historian Bernard Lewis is quite a well respected authority on this subject.

  10. #10
    Banned Patron
    Join Date
    22 Apr 06
    Posts
    262
    Bernard Lewis is expert of Ottoman history and Middle East. Any way... What does he say about the subject?

  11. #11
    Regular
    Join Date
    02 Oct 07
    Posts
    45
    In his book "The Middle East 2000 Years of History From The Rise Of Christianity To The Present Day" Bernard Lewis covers some of these points. He mentions how "Catherine the Great" in the 18th century expanded Imperial Russia`s influence Southwards and this brought it into conflict with both the Ottoman Empire and Safarid Iran

  12. #12
    Padishah Shahanshah Senior Contributor xerxes's Avatar
    Join Date
    23 Jan 07
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,441
    Quote Originally Posted by great one View Post
    In his book "The Middle East 2000 Years of History From The Rise Of Christianity To The Present Day" Bernard Lewis covers some of these points. He mentions how "Catherine the Great" in the 18th century expanded Imperial Russia`s influence Southwards and this brought it into conflict with both the Ottoman Empire and Safarid Iran
    I would say the samething, but does that make me a expert?
    If we contrast the rapid progress of this mischievous discovery of gunpowder with the slow and laborious advances of reason, science, and the arts of peace, a philosopher, according to his temper, will laugh or weep at the folly of mankind. - Edward Gibbon

  13. #13
    FreeGeneral Senior Contributor Big K's Avatar
    Join Date
    11 Dec 06
    Location
    Istanbul, Turkey, Turkey
    Posts
    2,254
    my question is:
    why anybody didnt realise that this conflict will "eat" them all?
    Love all, trust a few, do wrong to none; be able for thine enemy rather in power than use; and keep thy friend under thine own life's key; be checked for silence, but never taxed for speech.

  14. #14
    WAB Resident Historian Senior Contributor Kansas Bear's Avatar
    Join Date
    01 Jul 06
    Location
    Talisker distillery
    Posts
    1,705
    Quote Originally Posted by great one View Post
    In his book "The Middle East 2000 Years of History From The Rise Of Christianity To The Present Day" Bernard Lewis covers some of these points. He mentions how "Catherine the Great" in the 18th century expanded Imperial Russia`s influence Southwards and this brought it into conflict with both the Ottoman Empire and Safarid Iran

    He also calls the Ottoman Empire, Turco-Persian!!

  15. #15
    Banned
    Join Date
    18 Nov 08
    Location
    ankara
    Posts
    22
    Tsarist russia had made good work for europe.They saved europe from turkish invaders.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •