+ Reply to Thread
Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 93
  1. #61
    Banished
    Join Date
    12-10-07
    Location
    Clarksville, TN
    Posts
    71

    Quote Originally Posted by HistoricalDavid View Post
    Well done, mudwhistle, on showing us all how to stay on-topic.



    All those are off the top of my head, i.e. someone who has nowhere the daily exposure to US politics that you guys do, and directed at Obama.

    Ooh, another one from my YouTube travails. This time they apologise for it. YouTube - Fox News' E.D. Hill Apologizes for "Terrorist Fist Jab"

    Oh and concerning your (unsourced, gosh!) "99.9% of intolerance comes from the left!" comment; Bill O'Reilly alone probably accounts for more than 0.1% considering his viewership figures.
    So you think everything you mentioned came directly from Fox News?

    Osama..Obama....and so-on?

    I think you need to watch The View or MSNBC if you think Fox is being intolerant.

  2. #62
    Distant Deeps or Skies Senior Contributor HistoricalDavid's Avatar
    Join Date
    19-07-05
    Location
    North London, UK
    Posts
    2,361

    Quote Originally Posted by mudwhistle View Post
    So you think everything you mentioned came directly from Fox News?
    I didn't say anything of the sort. Now that you mention it, yes, it's quite funny they came from America's biggest cable news network. But it is irrelevant nonetheless. dalem's original challenge read thus:

    "So what are some examples of conservative "attack plus slander" we could discuss and compare to demonstrated liberal intolerances?"

    Well I provided the examples. By extension he wanted to discuss and compare. Well, follow this:

    Osama..Obama....and so-on?
    Implying that it would be great were a presidential candidate taken out like the world's most infamous terrorist? On America's biggest cable news network?

    That's not just intolerant, it's not just sick to the bone that you want to kill someone for disagreeing with you, it's probably time for a chat with the men in black.

    I think you need to watch The View or MSNBC if you think Fox is being intolerant.
    Humour me. Y'know, give me the benefit of the doubt. Give me an example which matches the severity and influence of the implied assassination. All it takes is to post a link. I'm sorry, I'm a pissant.
    HD Ready?

  3. #63
    Senior Contributor gunnut's Avatar
    Join Date
    27-01-06
    Location
    DPRK, Demokratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
    Posts
    17,714

    Quote Originally Posted by HistoricalDavid View Post
    IImplying that it would be great were a presidential candidate taken out like the world's most infamous terrorist? On America's biggest cable news network?

    That's not just intolerant, it's not just sick to the bone that you want to kill someone for disagreeing with you, it's probably time for a chat with the men in black.
    You're right. That's very intolerant. And it came from Ted Kennedy. Teddy called him "Osama...Obama" once.
    "Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb.

  4. #64
    Banished
    Join Date
    12-10-07
    Location
    Clarksville, TN
    Posts
    71

    Quote Originally Posted by HistoricalDavid View Post
    I didn't say anything of the sort. Now that you mention it, yes, it's quite funny they came from America's biggest cable news network. But it is irrelevant nonetheless. dalem's original challenge read thus:

    "So what are some examples of conservative "attack plus slander" we could discuss and compare to demonstrated liberal intolerances?"

    Well I provided the examples. By extension he wanted to discuss and compare. Well, follow this:



    Implying that it would be great were a presidential candidate taken out like the world's most infamous terrorist? On America's biggest cable news network?

    That's not just intolerant, it's not just sick to the bone that you want to kill someone for disagreeing with you, it's probably time for a chat with the men in black.



    Humour me. Y'know, give me the benefit of the doubt. Give me an example which matches the severity and influence of the implied assassination. All it takes is to post a link. I'm sorry, I'm a pissant.

    Unlike many of the other channels Fox News doesn't just report the news that they feel is fit to report, but all of the news. The sources you spoke of were not Fox News. Fox isn't in the business of making news like some other channels do.

    Hosts on The View tend to talk negatively against Christians.

    Whoopi Goldberg wondered if Gov. Sarah Palin as VP wasn't a violation of the separation of church and state.....meaning that no Christian has the right to work in our government.

    And what about her statement that a strict constitutionalist judge might mean she would have to go back to slavery.
    YouTube - Whoopi to McCain: Do I have to worry about slavery again?

    This statement was willfully ignorant and showed a form of bigotry towards people on the right.

    More pearls of wisdom from Whoopi and Joy Behar:

    YouTube - The View Get Heated Over Sarah Palin
    YouTube - Bill O'Reilly and Joy Behar clash on "The View"
    YouTube - Laura Ingraham versus Whoopi and Joy on the View
    YouTube - Whoopi Goldberg mocks John McCain being a POW.
    Last edited by mudwhistle; 20th September 2008 at 02:37.

  5. #65
    Banished
    Join Date
    12-10-07
    Location
    Clarksville, TN
    Posts
    71

    And let's hear some of Bill Maher's tolerance for small towns and the mayors that run them, Hockey Moms, or Governors of states that don't have any black people..

    "Alaska......are you kidding me?"


    YouTube - Bill Maher about Sarah Palin

  6. #66
    Lord High Hullabalooster Senior Contributor dalem's Avatar
    Join Date
    24-11-04
    Location
    Columbia Heights, MN
    Posts
    10,383

    Maher is a rather low-class troll of a man.

    -dale

  7. #67
    Lord High Hullabalooster Senior Contributor dalem's Avatar
    Join Date
    24-11-04
    Location
    Columbia Heights, MN
    Posts
    10,383

    Quote Originally Posted by astralis View Post
    dale,



    oh man, when i saw that remark i looked left and right- there's a LOT of female O-6s here whom if they saw that would make you their wailin' b****!
    'Cuz they can't accept the reality of their inability to accept reality.

    -dale

  8. #68
    Lord High Hullabalooster Senior Contributor dalem's Avatar
    Join Date
    24-11-04
    Location
    Columbia Heights, MN
    Posts
    10,383

    Quote Originally Posted by crooks View Post
    Ah you must know what I mean - take McCain's recent ad (America's nasty presidential election | America not quite at its best | The Economist) stating Obama once backed a bill that would give kindergarten children comprehensive sex education. this seemed to bw a distortion: the bill Mr Obama backed provided for age-appropriate sex education, and was intended to protect children from sex offenders.
    Without the exact text of the ad in front of me (I am youtubeless here at work) I cannot defend the specifics. From the transcripts I've already read McCain's ad stuck to the letter of the bill.

    Lipstick on a pig etc..
    How is that an attack by conservatives?

    Conservatives are aggressive, and will slander the enemy as much as possible - it's not a bad thing, nor a particularly good thing, it's just tactics.

    American Liberal tactics generally do seem to be to mooooaaan until someone listens - again, politically I'd imagine it's just a tactic, regardless of what people's personal views on it must be.
    Examples examples examples. There is mudslinging, in which all sides engage, and their is censorship, stifling of speech, and actual violence, which is 99.9% perpetrated by the left against conservatives.

    -dale

  9. #69
    Banished
    Join Date
    05-07-08
    Location
    I've got my helmet on; you can't tell me I'm not in space!
    Posts
    708

    Ah, Blarney. A great place to visit in old Eire... ANy stane wit great powers is best approached wit caution. Uther learned this when he drew the great claymore frome the stane he was led to.

    Crooks, conservatives latch onto the non-fictional leg of the beast, wheras I find the liberals here often create chimeras to latch onto... Think of a bull dog confronted with a very real bull, vs. the same bull dog confronted with an animal of the owners imagination (i.e. a chimera, ****-a-trice, etc)

  10. #70
    Administrator Parihaka's Avatar
    Join Date
    10-11-04
    Location
    Te Whanganui-a-Tara, Te Ika a Maui, Aotearoa.
    Posts
    13,926

    Quote Originally Posted by dalem View Post
    How is that an attack by conservatives?
    It's actually the conservatives running the attacks on Palin as a means of keeping the messiah out of the news. Do try and keep up Dale.
    There's only one basic human right, the right to do as you damn well please. And with it comes the only basic human duty, the duty to take the consequences.

    P. J. O'Rourke

  11. #71
    Lord High Hullabalooster Senior Contributor dalem's Avatar
    Join Date
    24-11-04
    Location
    Columbia Heights, MN
    Posts
    10,383

    Foolish me.

    -dale

  12. #72
    Staff Emeritus
    She-Devil
    Julie's Avatar
    Join Date
    04-08-03
    Location
    Georgia, USA
    Posts
    8,548

    Quote Originally Posted by dalem View Post
    And yes, the numbers all show that cnservatives are happier overall than liberals. Makes sense because liberalism is a more feminine mode of thought and females do not accept reality as easily as males.

    -dale
    Hmmmm, I'm sure Gov. Palin would resent that remark since she seems to accept reality very well which is why McCain picked her for VP. She gets it.

    Now my opinion would be women accept reality better than men. I wonder how many grown men are still living at home with mommy doing their dirty laundry and cooking their dinner so they can be overall happier not accepting and facing reality?

    Along the same note, how would you like to come with me behind the bookcase and let me make you my wailing *****?

  13. #73
    Banished
    Join Date
    12-10-07
    Location
    Clarksville, TN
    Posts
    71

    Quote Originally Posted by HistoricalDavid View Post
    Well done, mudwhistle, on showing us all how to stay on-topic.



    All those are off the top of my head, i.e. someone who has nowhere the daily exposure to US politics that you guys do, and directed at Obama.

    Ooh, another one from my YouTube travails. This time they apologise for it. YouTube - Fox News' E.D. Hill Apologizes for "Terrorist Fist Jab"

    Oh and concerning your (unsourced, gosh!) "99.9% of intolerance comes from the left!" comment; Bill O'Reilly alone probably accounts for more than 0.1% considering his viewership figures.
    Maybe if you knew a bit more about what you're talking about you would provide actual examples of conservatives making all of the before mentioned comments.

    Many of them were made by other Democrats......primarily because most of them happened during the primaries and were thrown at Obama by Hillary supporters.

    But you tell me if this isn't elitist:

    A political storm is brewing over Sen. Barack Obama's recent statements. Last Sunday, Obama was explaining his difficulty with winning over working-class voters in Pennsylvania and the Midwest, saying they have become frustrated with economic conditions:

    "And it's not surprising then that they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations," Obama said.

    Obama: 'They cling to guns or religion' | Liveblog | Christianity Today
    And guess what, Ted Kennedy first said "Osama, Obama", not a conservative.
    Last edited by mudwhistle; 20th September 2008 at 07:54.

  14. #74
    Banished
    Join Date
    12-10-07
    Location
    Clarksville, TN
    Posts
    71

    Another nasty remark by a Democrat that shows he is a bigot.

    He calls Sarah Palin disabled:

    Breitbart.tv » Political Shock: Rep. Rangel Mocks Sarah Palin as ‘Disabled’ in ‘Astonishing’ Interview

  15. #75
    Banished
    Join Date
    12-10-07
    Location
    Clarksville, TN
    Posts
    71

    And here's another wonderful comment by Sandra Bernhard.

    She thinks Sarah Palin needs to be gang-raped by blacks in Manhattan.

    Sandra Bernhard: Palin Would Be Gang-Raped By Blacks in Manhattan
    By Tim Graham (Bio | Archive)
    September 19, 2008 - 07:59 ET

    The Washington Post isn’t the only daily D.C. newspaper to rave about Sandra Bernhard’s anti-Palin ranting. Wednesday’s Washington Examiner joined in, with the headline "Comedienne delivers enraged optimism." Barbara Mackay claimed "in the end, oddly and subtly, Bernhard’s message is positive."

    That’s not the impression you’d get from the blog of Theater J, where Bernhard is appearing. It has video of Bernhard calling Palin "Uncle Women," a "turncoat b—h" and a "whore." One complaint on the blog that Bernhard crosses a line of political incorrectness draws a defense from Ari Roth of Theater J that really drops the curtain on how coarse this show is:

    In fact, the play wears its politically VERY correct heart on its sleeve with its indictment of America as "A Man’s World, It’s a White Man’s World, It’s a F–ked Up White Man’s Racist World" and can only be suggested to be racist in its content if one is hell-bent on protecting White Folk for Sandra’s blistering indictment.When Sandra warns Sarah Palin not to come into Manhattan lest she get gang-raped by some of Sandra’s big black brothers, she’s being provocative, combative, humorous, and yes, let’s allow, disgusting.

    The fact that the show has a few riffs like this does not — to my mind — make it a "disgusting show." there’s too much beauty, variety, vitality, and intelligence to label the entire show as "disgusting." I’ll agree with you that we produced this show because we did find it to be edgy — because we wanted to give right wing conservative Jews a good run for their money by being on the receiving end of some blistering indictments from Sandra.Does it go over the edge sometimes? On the gang-rape joke, yes. Sure. Not much else. It goes over the edge and then comes right back to the cutting edge. [Profanity editing is mine.]


    Sandra Bernhard: Palin Would Be Gang-Raped By Blacks in Manhattan | NewsBusters.org

    "Now you got Uncle Women, like Sarah Palin, who jumps on the s--t and points her fingers at other women. Turncoat b---h! Don’t you f--kin’ reference Old Testament, *****! You stay with your new Goyish crappy shiksa funky bulls--t! Don’t you touch my Old Testament, you b---h! Because we have left it open for interpre-ta-tion! It is no longer taken literally! You whore in your f--kin' cheap New Vision cheap-ass plastic glasses and your [sneering voice] hair up. A Tina Fey-Megan Mullally brokedown bulls--t moment."

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Why We Are in Iraq
    By Leader in forum The War in Iraq
    Replies: 109
    Last Post: 2nd September 2008, 19:13
  2. qestions for anti-CCPs
    By Fiona Shrot in forum International Politics
    Replies: 156
    Last Post: 28th April 2008, 14:17
  3. Greatest Turkish Empires
    By AlpErTunga in forum Ancient, Medieval & Early Modern Ages
    Replies: 177
    Last Post: 12th January 2008, 11:49
  4. Latin America's Left Turn
    By FibrillatorD in forum International Politics
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 25th July 2007, 05:10
  5. Why do English drive on the left, most others on the right?
    By Ironduke in forum World Affairs Board Pub
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 6th May 2004, 03:33

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts