Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 49

Thread: Clinton vs. Giuliani in 2008

  1. #1
    Staff Emeritus Julie's Avatar
    Join Date
    04 Aug 03
    Location
    Georgia, USA
    Posts
    10,597

    Clinton vs. Giuliani in 2008

    Poll: Clinton vs. Giuliani in 2008

    (CNN) -- If the results of a recent poll pan out, voters will see two big names from the Big Apple on the ballot in November 2008.

    Those names are Sen. Hillary Clinton, a Democrat, and former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, a Republican.

    The CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll released Thursday indicated Clinton and Giuliani were the early favorites to win their respective party's nomination.

    But those polled said they believe the former first lady would have a smoother path to the nomination than her GOP counterpart.

    Conducted December 9-11, the telephone poll asked 393 registered voters who described themselves as Republicans and 446 registered voters who described themselves as Democrats who they were most likely to support in their respective primaries.

    The survey had a sampling error of plus or minus 5 percentage points.

    Clinton snared the majority of the Democratic voters polled. And with more than two years before the primaries, she was ahead of her two nearest potential competitors by nearly 30 percentage points.

    Giuliani, on the other hand, edged out Sen. John McCain of Arizona by only 8 percentage points, 30-22.

    Another 18 percent of those polled selected Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, despite her repeated assertion that she has no plans to run.

    Bringing up the rear on the GOP side were Sen. George Allen, of Virginia, 7 percent; Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist of Tennessee, 3 percent; Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, 3 percent; and Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour, 2 percent.

    The remaining 15 percent of Republicans polled said they would support someone else.

    Clinton was the favorite of 43 percent of the Democrats polled. Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts and Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina -- the party's candidates in 2004 -- each had 14 percent.

    Eight percent of the Democrats polled selected Sen. Joe Biden of Delaware; 3 percent chose Virginia Gov. Mark Warner; another 3 percent picked New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson; 1 percent opted for Sen. Evan Bayh of Indiana; and 1 percent favored Iowa Gov. Tom Vilsack.

    The remaining 13 percent of Democrats polled said they would support another candidate.

    The 2008 presidential race could be the most wide-open contest in more than five decades.

    With President Bush unable to seek another term and Vice President Dick Cheney insisting he won't succeed him, the table is set for the first race since 1952 in which neither a sitting president nor a vice president is on the ballot.

    In that race, Republican Dwight Eisenhower defeated Democrat Adlai Stevenson by a landslide electoral vote of 442 to 89.

    http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/12/...oll/index.html

  2. #2
    THL
    THL is offline
    Senior Contributor THL's Avatar
    Join Date
    23 Jun 05
    Location
    35 minutes outside Chicago (please don't refer to it as "Chi-Town"...that's annoying)
    Posts
    5,910
    OMG! I was just about to post this same thread! With my opinions, of course.

    Hillary and Rudy - tough choice for me if I had to make the decision based only on what I currently know and if I had to make that choice today, I have to admit.

    Rudy is pro-choice which is a HUGE plus in my eyes for him. For opening the oil reserves is also good in my eyes (but so is Hillary to the best of my knowledge). Rudy is for getting people off of welfare (also great). But there was something mentioned about "No taxpayer dollars for offensive art. (Oct 1999)" (from the link below)...now this is not something that I am extremely passionate about, offensive art, but my concern with this is that if taxpayers money is going to be used for art, then it should be used for all art, not just what 'ol Rudy likes to look at. Again, not a huge deal for me, but I am going to keep the underlying meaning in the back of my mind.

    Hillary is also pro-choice but she is also for stem-cell research which I like. (I don't think Rudy had his opinion listed either way on this). She is for domestic partner benefits. For restricting rules on personal bankruptcy which I think is also good. License and register all handgun sales (Sniper, leave me alone ). Welfare payments: "I’ve advocated tying the welfare payment to certain behavior about being a good parent. You couldn’t get your welfare check if your child wasn’t immunized. You couldn’t get your welfare check if you didn’t participate in a parenting program. You couldn’t get your check if you didn’t show up for student-teacher conferences. I’m a big believer in linking opportunity and rights with responsibility and duties." This last one I really like. Not letting people on welfare get away with not attending to their childs needs. Just sad that the US would even need that, though.


    Hillary 2000
    Rudy 2000
    Last edited by THL; 16 Dec 05, at 15:35.
    "To dream of the person you would like to be is to waste the person you are."-Sholem Asch

    "I always turn to the sports page first, which records people's accomplishments. The front page has nothing but man's failures."-Earl Warren

    "I didn't intend for this to take on a political tone. I'm just here for the drugs."-Nancy Reagan, when asked a political question at a "Just Say No" rally

    "He no play-a da game, he no make-a da rules."-Earl Butz, on the Pope's attitude toward birth control

  3. #3
    Staff Emeritus Julie's Avatar
    Join Date
    04 Aug 03
    Location
    Georgia, USA
    Posts
    10,597
    My sentiments exactly THL.

  4. #4
    Defense Professional Dreadnought's Avatar
    Join Date
    12 May 05
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA.
    Posts
    13,831

    Post

    Rudy has my vote. Clinton and her husband both play two sides of the demorcratic party.

  5. #5
    Patron
    Join Date
    21 Nov 04
    Location
    Baltimore, MD, USA
    Posts
    253
    Lets just put it this way... Hillary Clinton has a better chance of winning the republican primary than Rudy Giuliani.

    If I had to make a prediciton right now, Id say Clinton vs Allen. Sen. George Allen of VA is being touted as the next Ronald Reagan by many on the right. He was recently featured on the cover of the National Review. Here is the article that went with the cover.

    Im hoping for a Virginia vs Virginia matchup though. Gov. Warner vs Sen. Allen. That would be a great race.
    Last edited by nickshepAK; 16 Dec 05, at 21:50.

  6. #6
    Lord High Hullabalooster Senior Contributor dalem's Avatar
    Join Date
    24 Nov 04
    Location
    Columbia Heights, MN
    Posts
    12,978
    Quote Originally Posted by nickshepAK
    Lets just put it this way... Hillary Clinton has a better chance of winning the republican primary than Rudy Giuliani.
    Not true. Republicans enjoy winning. If it turns out that Rudy is the best candidate, Rudy will get the nod. An imperfect Republican winning is better than a perfect Republican losing.

    -dale

  7. #7
    Defense Professional Dreadnought's Avatar
    Join Date
    12 May 05
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA.
    Posts
    13,831

    Post

    Quote Originally Posted by nickshepAK
    Lets just put it this way... Hillary Clinton has a better chance of winning the republican primary than Rudy Giuliani.

    If I had to make a prediciton right now, Id say Clinton vs Allen. Sen. George Allen of VA is being touted as the next Ronald Reagan by many on the right. He was recently featured on the cover of the National Review. Here is the article that went with the cover.

    Im hoping for a Virginia vs Virginia matchup though. Gov. Warner vs Sen. Allen. That would be a great race.
    The U.S. is not ready for a woman president and wont be for years to come. Hilliary wont make it and you can quote me on it. Its not that I have anything against her the U.S. is just not ready for a woman to be president. Pehaps in the next 10-20 years things may change and a woman president may be a welcomed change as well.

  8. #8
    Staff Emeritus
    Join Date
    03 Aug 03
    Posts
    16,429
    Quite true.

    Guiliani is FAR from my idea of a dream candidate, but he really would be a very strong candidate, especially if hillary faces off with him.

    Hillary running will polarize the right like it has never been polarized before. Republican turnout will be immense to stop that woman at all costs.

  9. #9
    Patron
    Join Date
    21 Nov 04
    Location
    Baltimore, MD, USA
    Posts
    253
    Quote Originally Posted by dalem
    Not true. Republicans enjoy winning. If it turns out that Rudy is the best candidate, Rudy will get the nod. An imperfect Republican winning is better than a perfect Republican losing.

    -dale
    True, but not true at the same time. If you think the Republican primary voters in Iowa and South Carolina are going to welcome a pro-abortion, pro-gay rights, anti-gun, northeasterner like Rudy Giuliani with open arms, well, your mistaken.

    Considering what they did to McCain in 2000... I can only imagine what they will do to Giuliani in 2008.

  10. #10
    WAB Bartender Defense Professional
    Military Professional
    Bluesman's Avatar
    Join Date
    24 Nov 04
    Location
    Nellis AFB, Las Vegas, NV
    Posts
    8,566
    Quote Originally Posted by nickshepAK
    True, but not true at the same time. If you think the Republican primary voters in Iowa and South Carolina are going to welcome a pro-abortion, pro-gay rights, anti-gun, northeasterner like Rudy Giuliani with open arms, well, your mistaken.

    Considering what they did to McCain in 2000... I can only imagine what they will do to Giuliani in 2008.
    And how many delegates do Iowa and South Carolina send to the convention?

    I think dalem is correct.

  11. #11
    Senior Contributor BenRoethig's Avatar
    Join Date
    03 Jan 04
    Location
    Dubuque, Iowa, United States
    Posts
    1,458
    Quote Originally Posted by nickshepAK
    True, but not true at the same time. If you think the Republican primary voters in Iowa and South Carolina are going to welcome a pro-abortion, pro-gay rights, anti-gun, northeasterner like Rudy Giuliani with open arms, well, your mistaken.

    Considering what they did to McCain in 2000... I can only imagine what they will do to Giuliani in 2008.
    This Iowan would. My dream ticket is Giuliani/McCain. That being said, the current political process has become very european like where it is incapable of nominating competent leaders, only ideologues.
    F/A-18E/F Super Hornet: The Honda Accord of fighters.

  12. #12
    Patron
    Join Date
    21 Nov 04
    Location
    Baltimore, MD, USA
    Posts
    253
    Quote Originally Posted by Bluesman
    And how many delegates do Iowa and South Carolina send to the convention?

    I think dalem is correct.
    Iowa and South Carolina are crucial parts of the Repubican primary. Winning the early primaries means a lot more than just delegates. It means increased name id, increased media coverage, and unlimited fundraising opportunities.

    The last time a Republican presidential candidate lost the South Carolina primary, but went on to win the nomination was Gerald Ford in 1976 when he defeated Ronald Reagan.

  13. #13
    WAB Bartender Defense Professional
    Military Professional
    Bluesman's Avatar
    Join Date
    24 Nov 04
    Location
    Nellis AFB, Las Vegas, NV
    Posts
    8,566
    This was fun, looking back over some historical posts...
    "The quickest way of ending a war is to lose it, and if one finds the prospect of a long war intolerable, it is natural to disbelieve in the possibility of victory."
    - George Orwell

  14. #14
    Lord High Hullabalooster Senior Contributor dalem's Avatar
    Join Date
    24 Nov 04
    Location
    Columbia Heights, MN
    Posts
    12,978
    Quote Originally Posted by Bluesman View Post
    This was fun, looking back over some historical posts...
    Definitely.

    And where the heck did Julie go?

    -dale

  15. #15
    Staff Emeritus Julie's Avatar
    Join Date
    04 Aug 03
    Location
    Georgia, USA
    Posts
    10,597
    Quote Originally Posted by dalem View Post
    Definitely.

    And where the heck did Julie go?

    -dale
    Right here.....I've been watchin'.

Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Clinton and Iraq war
    By Major_Armstrong in forum Operation Iraqi Freedom/Operation New Dawn
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 26 Sep 08,, 09:46
  2. Hillary Clinton joins 2008 race
    By Karthik in forum American Politics & Economy
    Replies: 70
    Last Post: 27 Jan 07,, 04:08
  3. Giuliani takes first step toward '08 presidential bid
    By Julie in forum American Politics & Economy
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 15 Nov 06,, 06:16
  4. Clinton vs. McCain
    By Julie in forum American Politics & Economy
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 15 Mar 06,, 22:11
  5. Condoms Are Named for Clinton, Lewinsky
    By ZFBoxcar in forum World Affairs Board Pub
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 22 Sep 05,, 00:38

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •