+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 16 to 22 of 22

Thread: Obama seeks authority to continue to shrink goverment

  1. #16
    Field mechanik Senior Contributor omon's Avatar
    Join Date
    01 Nov 06
    Location
    bk
    Posts
    3,276
    Country: United States
    lol, sure we believe you obama, NOT.

    this administration can't even lie that good, only one person in this thread fell for it.
    "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote!" B. Franklin

  2. #17

    Join Date
    04 Apr 11
    Posts
    431
    Country: United States
    All of the decline in the public sector has been on the state and local level.

    Most of that has been in K-12 education, which is funded primarily by property tax receipts. There are three factors in the decline of property tax receipts:
    • declining home construction
    • declining home values
    • home foreclosures
    On the national level - the federal workforce has expanded by 200,000.

    The decline on the state and local levels has nothing to do with the federal government, and is not in any way an outcome of any federal policies.

    It is solely a function of a shrinking economic base that is outside the purview of the federal government.

  3. #18
    Contributor
    Join Date
    16 Sep 10
    Posts
    303
    Country: United States
    According to a Googled USA Today article dated March 4, 2010- the average Fed worker made $67,756 while the average private sector worker made $45,155.
    Don't listen to me, I'm a wack job.

  4. #19
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    07 Oct 08
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    5,000
    Country: United States
    Quote Originally Posted by Laser View Post
    According to a Googled USA Today article dated March 4, 2010- the average Fed worker made $67,756 while the average private sector worker made $45,155.
    doesnt really mean anything if it isnt apples to apples. the thing I didnt notice was an allowance for census workers on that other website as well. It's also worth noting Obama is constrained by the spending congress authorizes. He cant just hire 200k goverment workers because the mood strikes
    Where free unions and collective bargaining are forbidden, freedom is lost.”
    ~Ronald Reagan

  5. #20

    Join Date
    04 Apr 11
    Posts
    431
    Country: United States
    Quote Originally Posted by Roosveltrepub View Post
    doesnt really mean anything if it isnt apples to apples. the thing I didnt notice was an allowance for census workers on that other website as well. It's also worth noting Obama is constrained by the spending congress authorizes. He cant just hire 200k goverment workers because the mood strikes
    Obama hasn't shrunk the federal government.

    The title you selected for this thread was "Obama seeks authority to continue to shrink government."

    He can't continue doing something he has yet to begin, especially as what he's done thus far is the polar opposite of "shrinking".

    The federal bureaucracy has been expanded by 200,000 positions during the Obama administration. The entire temporary increase in census workers has come and gone between beginning of his administration and today, and what we're left with is a federal bureaucracy that has swelled by 200,000.

    The expansion of the federal government since he took office is due to:
    1. The Recovery Act
    2. The 2010 Federal Budget
    Both of which the Obama administration drew up, submitted, and were passed by a Democratic Congress.

    175,000 jobs were added in his first two years (avg. 87,500 per year) - a rate which slowed to 17,000 jobs in FY 2011 with Republican control of the House and the 2011 budget impasse.
    Last edited by tgbyhn; 20 Jan 12, at 23:03.

  6. #21
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    07 Oct 08
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    5,000
    Country: United States
    Quote Originally Posted by tgbyhn View Post
    Obama hasn't shrunk the federal government.

    The title you selected for this thread was "Obama seeks authority to continue to shrink government."

    He can't continue doing something he has yet to begin, especially as what he's done thus far is the polar opposite of "shrinking".

    The federal bureaucracy has been expanded by 200,000 positions during the Obama administration. The entire temporary increase in census workers has come and gone between beginning of his administration and today, and what we're left with is a federal bureaucracy that has swelled by 200,000.

    The expansion of the federal government since he took office is due to:
    1. The Recovery Act
    2. The 2010 Federal Budget
    Both of which the Obama administration drew up, submitted, and were passed by a Democratic Congress.

    175,000 jobs were added in his first two years (avg. 87,500 per year) - a rate which slowed to 17,000 jobs in FY 2011 with Republican control of the House and the 2011 budget impasse.
    the two sources disagree so I wouldnt be willing to surrender that point. Reguardless though eliminating overlapping or nonsensical divisons of responsibility as well as redundant management chains seem like an idea wveryone could support
    Where free unions and collective bargaining are forbidden, freedom is lost.”
    ~Ronald Reagan

  7. #22

    Join Date
    04 Apr 11
    Posts
    431
    Country: United States
    Quote Originally Posted by Roosveltrepub View Post
    the two sources disagree so I wouldnt be willing to surrender that point. Reguardless though eliminating overlapping or nonsensical divisons of responsibility as well as redundant management chains seem like an idea wveryone could support
    You posted a graph of a screenshot that wasn't from the PDF you claimed it was from. Despite that - the only decline in public sector employment has been on the state and local level, mostly in education. Due to shrinking to stagnant tax receipts (especially property) and increasing liabilities (e.g. teacher pensions). It's not a positive, and it has nothing to do with Obama.

    The Post Office is self-funded and makes its own decisions regarding hiring and layoffs. Any employment cuts there aren't due to Obama or the federal budgets, but declining consumer purchases of their services and products, and the P.O. balance sheet. Just like UPS or FedEx.

    The federal workforce has expanded under Obama, by nearly 200,000 jobs.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. FCC wants to shrink the "broadband gap"
    By gunnut in forum American Politics & Economy
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 11 Nov 11,, 01:46
  2. The Problem with Centalized Authority
    By Shek in forum International Politics
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 23 Jun 08,, 19:44
  3. Fall Down Abulgarian Goverment
    By SEDRIC in forum International Politics
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 24 Feb 07,, 16:44
  4. Moral Authority?
    By kmchugh in forum American Politics & Economy
    Replies: 61
    Last Post: 06 Oct 05,, 05:28

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts