+ Reply to Thread
Page 8 of 22 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ... LastLast
Results 106 to 120 of 321

Thread: America The worlds police

  1. #106
    Staff Emeritus
    Join Date
    06 Aug 03
    Posts
    21,433
    Country: Canada
    Quote Originally Posted by lwarmonger
    Which is not really saying much.
    Quote Originally Posted by lwarmonger
    Yes, but I don't think such a conflict is likely. Japan is capable of defending itself against all non-nuclear comers, and South Korea cannot trust North Korea at it's back.
    Well, how about this. The Koreans are still pissed off about the Comfort Women issue and diplomatic protests over Japanese schoolbooks changes and refused to join in any Japanese alliance.

    Saying things now?
    Chimo

  2. #107
    Military Professional
    Join Date
    04 Feb 05
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    36
    Country: Canada
    Quote Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers
    Well, how about this. The Koreans are still pissed off about the Comfort Women issue and diplomatic protests over Japanese schoolbooks changes and refused to join in any Japanese alliance.

    Saying things now?
    I'm sorry to say I'd have to disagree with this statement. I've actually been to Korea and the country dosen't seem to harbor a lot of anti-Japanese sentiment. I mean, amongst the older generation there certainly is a lot of hostility towards Japan. However, amongst the newer generations there is not a lot of hostility towards Japan as compared to anti-US sentiment. I think it would be extremely difficult for S.Korea to launch an attack under both military and poiltical circumstances. (The US would never allow the attack even with its troops out, which it actually is doing to some degree). Militarily, what would be the objective? A genocidal puntitive attack? Possibly, but international condemnation would be great plus it would accomplish nothing stragetically. Conquest of Japan? Highely unlikely, basically the S.Korean Navy can do nothing of this sort.

  3. #108
    Military Professional
    Join Date
    09 Feb 05
    Posts
    1,781
    Quote Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers
    Well, how about this. The Koreans are still pissed off about the Comfort Women issue and diplomatic protests over Japanese schoolbooks changes and refused to join in any Japanese alliance.

    Saying things now?

    I don't see how that could possibly lead them to trust North Korea to keep their hands to themselves while South Korea is fighting Japan. Regardless of who South Korea hates, they cannot afford to turn their back on North Korea for any reason.

  4. #109
    Staff Emeritus
    Join Date
    06 Aug 03
    Posts
    21,433
    Country: Canada
    Quote Originally Posted by MKristensen908
    I'm sorry to say I'd have to disagree with this statement. I've actually been to Korea and the country dosen't seem to harbor a lot of anti-Japanese sentiment. I mean, amongst the older generation there certainly is a lot of hostility towards Japan. However, amongst the newer generations there is not a lot of hostility towards Japan as compared to anti-US sentiment. I think it would be extremely difficult for S.Korea to launch an attack under both military and poiltical circumstances. (The US would never allow the attack even with its troops out, which it actually is doing to some degree). Militarily, what would be the objective? A genocidal puntitive attack? Possibly, but international condemnation would be great plus it would accomplish nothing stragetically. Conquest of Japan? Highely unlikely, basically the S.Korean Navy can do nothing of this sort.
    You and I were in a country where once they held the Olympics and the country couldn't be more nationalistic. Yet, less than 50 years after that, that country was torn apart by ethnic hatre.

    Asian hatre towards Japan is more obvious than the Sarajevo Olympics.

    Again, I stress that vengence is not based upon sound strategic decisions. FRY was not fought on sound strategic decisions and it was a bloody mess. There is no reason to expect any logic in vengence type wars.

    The one issue that would get any Korean going, regardless of generation, North or South, is the Comfort Women issue. I was surprised by the venom on that.

    While not directly related, witness Chinese civilian hostilities (regardless of Taiwan, Hong Kong, or Mainland) whenever the Japanese try to challenge the Chinese views of the Nanjing Massacre. The Koreans have just as much emotion and history invested as the Chinese.

    Quote Originally Posted by lwarmonger
    I don't see how that could possibly lead them to trust North Korea to keep their hands to themselves while South Korea is fighting Japan. Regardless of who South Korea hates, they cannot afford to turn their back on North Korea for any reason.
    You have not seen ethnic hatre upfront as I have.
    Last edited by Officer of Engineers; 17 Feb 05, at 12:51.
    Chimo

  5. #110
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    23 Nov 03
    Posts
    2,027
    Country: United Kingdom
    People seethed in the former Yugslavia for 500 years. Some of the vendettas being settled where that old.

    Look at "the troubles" in NI. There weren't many of the current marchers around when orange was a colour of battle.

  6. #111
    Military Professional
    Join Date
    09 Feb 05
    Posts
    1,781
    Quote Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers
    You have not seen ethnic hatre upfront as I have.
    True, but I have been to Japan. I've seen how they treat Koreans there, and I do understand to a degree what you are talking about. But for South Korea to turn it's back on North Korea would be insane, and stupid. I've never said that the South Koreans would not do it, but I remain firmly convinced that it would be suicidal for them to, and that the South Korean to order the initiation of a war with Japan would be crazy to do it. Since most democracies don't elect crazy people very often, I still don't think such a conflict is very likely. Even if the South Koreans wanted to start it, and the 2nd ID wasn't there anymore, all the United States would have to do is move a CVBG or two into the area, and with Japanese help we could easily crush South Korea's navy and airforce. We would not allow such a conflict to happen, as we do too much trade with Japan.
    Last edited by lwarmonger; 18 Feb 05, at 00:18.

  7. #112
    Staff Emeritus
    Join Date
    06 Aug 03
    Posts
    21,433
    Country: Canada
    Quote Originally Posted by lwarmonger
    True, but I have been to Japan. I've seen how they treat Koreans there, and I do understand to a degree what you are talking about. But for South Korea to turn it's back on North Korea would be insane, and stupid. I've never said that the South Koreans would not do it, but I remain firmly convinced that it would be suicidal for them to, and that the South Korean to order the initiation of a war with Japan would be crazy to do it.
    The point is that it is far too easy to push the right buttons between Japan and any of its neighbours.
    Chimo

  8. #113
    Military Professional
    Join Date
    09 Feb 05
    Posts
    1,781
    Quote Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers
    The point is that it is far too easy to push the right buttons between Japan and any of its neighbours.
    I agree, but neither side can really do much more than hurt the other.

  9. #114
    Staff Emeritus
    Join Date
    06 Aug 03
    Posts
    21,433
    Country: Canada
    Quote Originally Posted by lwarmonger
    I agree, but neither side can really do much more than hurt the other.
    My original points remains. The US remains in both South Korea and Japan with a secondary role of stopping those two countries from starting hostilities, for whatever reasons and whatever means. For whatever threat North Korea is, they are still South Korea's brothers and sisters. Japan is the bastard who raped their mothers and work their fathers to the bone before shooting them.
    Chimo

  10. #115
    New Member
    Join Date
    18 Feb 05
    Location
    Berlin, Germany
    Posts
    1
    Hi, Iīm from Germany and feel very scared by American politics and hope for freedom in the world like you does, but I hope youīll as Americans remember there are ways to geive freedom by nonviolent actions like Mahatma Gandhi and Martin L. King did.
    Now itīs only Americanīs job, to look and critisize government when-and wherever you can, because if Americans go on in politics like they did until now, they have to be carefull in the rest of the worlds countries, because many people e.g. in Europe are scared of your politicians and you know WHAT SCARED DOGS DO!
    Please look for the next generations and how they want to live, I think, not in a third World War, people donīt want one more.

    Hope you do better in future,

    Martin (17)

  11. #116
    Ray
    Ray is offline
    Military Professional Ray's Avatar
    Join Date
    20 Aug 03
    Posts
    19,528
    Country: India
    Colonel,

    You have historical reasons for that statement of yours

  12. #117
    Lord High Hullabalooster Senior Contributor dalem's Avatar
    Join Date
    24 Nov 04
    Location
    Columbia Heights, MN
    Posts
    11,551
    Country: United States
    Quote Originally Posted by KoRny
    Hi, Iīm from Germany and feel very scared by American politics and hope for freedom in the world like you does, but I hope youīll as Americans remember there are ways to geive freedom by nonviolent actions like Mahatma Gandhi and Martin L. King did.
    Now itīs only Americanīs job, to look and critisize government when-and wherever you can, because if Americans go on in politics like they did until now, they have to be carefull in the rest of the worlds countries, because many people e.g. in Europe are scared of your politicians and you know WHAT SCARED DOGS DO!
    Please look for the next generations and how they want to live, I think, not in a third World War, people donīt want one more.

    Hope you do better in future,

    Martin (17)
    Last I checked, scared dogs pee themselves, so your analogy is about right.

    Relax Martin - the world is a tough place and requires tough work and tough decisions.

    -dale

  13. #118
    Military Professional
    Join Date
    09 Feb 05
    Posts
    1,781
    Quote Originally Posted by KoRny
    Hi, Iīm from Germany and feel very scared by American politics and hope for freedom in the world like you does, but I hope youīll as Americans remember there are ways to geive freedom by nonviolent actions like Mahatma Gandhi and Martin L. King did.
    Now itīs only Americanīs job, to look and critisize government when-and wherever you can, because if Americans go on in politics like they did until now, they have to be carefull in the rest of the worlds countries, because many people e.g. in Europe are scared of your politicians and you know WHAT SCARED DOGS DO!
    Please look for the next generations and how they want to live, I think, not in a third World War, people donīt want one more.

    Hope you do better in future,

    Martin (17)
    What you just said was one of the primary reasons (fear of war) behind the policy of appeasment prior to WWII. Pretty speeches and pieces of paper never stopped dictators, and never will. Mahatma Gandhi and MLK's methods worked because it was the United States and Britian doing the responding. Had MLK tried peacefully protesting in Iraq, machine guns and tanks would have broken it up. Imagine what would have happened to Gandhi if the Japanese had conquered India. Tianamen Square did nothing, except result in a bunch of college students getting run over by Chinese tanks.

    Violence is the one definate way of unseating/stopping a dictator or oppressive regime. Violence or coercion. Anything else, and you will simply be percieved as weak, which is an invitation to bad behavior.

    Given that much of Europe feels as you do, I doubt that the United States has much to worry about in the near future. A scared dog with no teeth and no will to fight isn't really a threat.
    Last edited by lwarmonger; 18 Feb 05, at 20:24.

  14. #119
    Ray
    Ray is offline
    Military Professional Ray's Avatar
    Join Date
    20 Aug 03
    Posts
    19,528
    Country: India
    L'warmonger.

    Just a correction.

    The British did use MGs.

  15. #120
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    28 Nov 04
    Location
    The Great Southern USA, Georgia
    Posts
    963
    Quote Originally Posted by KoRny
    in Europe are scared of your politicians and you know WHAT SCARED DOGS DO!
    European scared dogs tuck their tails between their legs and run away while leaving a puddle of pee behind.

    And also... Nobody cares if Euope is scared. There always scared and thats why they give up freedom for personal security. Europeans being scared is like water being wet, it is, was, and will be.

    I would go on but I'm trying to be polite.

    Good day to you.

    PS. I would advise you to buy "Pampers" diapers, I hear that they have a wonderful seal to keep the umhm... contents from staining the pants.
    "Our citizenship in the United States is our national character. Our citizenship in any particular state is only our local distinction. By the latter we are known at home, by the former to the world. Our great title is AMERICANS…" -- Thomas Paine

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Christians besieged in Pakistan
    By Tronic in forum International Politics
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 07 Jun 07,, 05:51
  2. What makes a Muslim radical?
    By astralis in forum International Economy
    Replies: 263
    Last Post: 22 Dec 06,, 18:38
  3. Small incidents of communal violence all throughout 2004
    By Asim Aquil in forum International Politics
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 22 Jun 05,, 10:55

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts