+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 18

Thread: US-India Nuclear Deal Clears House

  1. #1
    New Member
    Join Date
    31 May 06
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    3

    US-India Nuclear Deal Clears House

    House approves India nuclear deal

    By Carol Giacomo, Diplomatic Correspondent
    Reuters
    Wednesday, July 26, 2006; 10:10 PM

    WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. House of Representatives gave overwhelming initial approval on Wednesday to a landmark civilian nuclear cooperation accord with India, an important but far from final step in making the agreement a reality.

    The approval vote was 359-68 after lawmakers rejected amendments that aimed to put limits on India's nuclear weapons program and were proposed by critics concerned the deal would harm nonproliferation goals.

    Lawmakers also rejected an effort to defer action until India did more to back U.S. efforts to contain Iran.

    The deal would allow nuclear-armed India to buy American nuclear reactors and fuel for the first time in more than 30 years, despite the fact it has still not signed the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.

    It also requires the rising South Asian power to open civilian nuclear facilities to international inspections, forgo future nuclear tests and cooperate with the United States and other nations on halting the spread of nuclear exports.

    "History will regard what we do today as a tidal shift in relations between India and the United States. This will be known as the day when Congress signaled definitively the end of the Cold War paradigm governing interactions between New Delhi and Washington," said Rep. Tom Lantos of California, senior Democrat on the House International Relations Committee.

    The Senate must also approve the bill but a vote is not expected until September. The House and Senate would vote again after U.S.-India negotiations on the technical details of the agreement are completed.

    India must also complete negotiations with the International Atomic Energy Agency on a system of inspections for its civilian nuclear facilities and the 45-nation Nuclear Suppliers Group must change its regulations to allow nuclear transfers to India.

    POURING 'NUCLEAR FUEL'

    Democratic Rep. Edward Markey of Massachusetts, head of a bipartisan nonproliferation task force, lambasted the deal as pouring "nuclear fuel on the fire of an India-Pakistan nuclear arms race" because it would allow New Delhi to expand its nuclear weapons production to upward of 50 bombs a year from seven.

    During several hours of debate, the House, led by President George W. Bush's Republican Party, soundly rejected an amendment that would have forced India to halt fissile material production as a condition of the nuclear deal.

    The House also rejected an amendment that would forbid India from capitalizing on a new ability to buy U.S. nuclear fuel by diverting all its domestically produced uranium for weapons use. India now uses half of its domestic uranium for energy production and half for weapons, lawmakers said.

    A surprise move to defer a vote until India did more to back U.S. efforts to contain Iran failed by 235-193.

    The Bush administration had warned such amendments would kill the deal, seen as crucial to an evolving strategic alliance between India and the United States, frequent Cold War adversaries.

    But proponents said requiring India to halt production of weapons-related fissile material would help ensure U.S. technology aided India's energy production, not bomb-making.

    As a signatory to the NPT, the United States is obligated not to help India and other states advance their nuclear weapons programs.

    Lawmakers made clear U.S. nuclear technology should only be used to meet India's growing energy demands, warning America's cooperation would end if India tested another nuclear weapon, as in 1998.

    The deal has also faced criticism in India, with communist parties that shore up Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's coalition and the opposition Hindu nationalists accusing Washington of setting new terms in the legislation.

    Link: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...072601776.html

  2. #2
    Arzi Hukumat-e-Azad Hind Senior Contributor Tronic's Avatar
    Join Date
    27 Dec 04
    Location
    Patiala, Punjab
    Posts
    2,839
    Country: India
    We still have to wait for the finals... the Congress...
    Last edited by Tronic; 27 Jul 06, at 04:35.
    Nabha Sparasham Deeptam
    -Touch The Sky With Glory

  3. #3
    Seeker of Rivendell Karthik's Avatar
    Join Date
    15 Dec 04
    Posts
    402
    Country: India
    It still has to get passed by the Senate. After that the two houses reconcile the differences in their respective bills and present one before the President.

    This 123 agreement - I don't know what's going to happen in Parliament. The commies seem determined to put the government on the mat.
    "There is no excellence in all this world that can be separated from right living." - David Star Jordan My Blog

  4. #4
    Ray
    Ray is offline
    Military Professional Ray's Avatar
    Join Date
    20 Aug 03
    Posts
    19,528
    Country: India
    And then........?


    "Some have learnt many Tricks of sly Evasion, Instead of Truth they use Equivocation, And eke it out with mental Reservation, Which is to good Men an Abomination."

    I don't have to attend every argument I'm invited to.

    HAKUNA MATATA

  5. #5
    formerly ab041937 Akshay's Avatar
    Join Date
    27 Jun 05
    Posts
    8
    Country: India
    Quote Originally Posted by Karthik
    After that the two houses reconcile the differences in their respective bills and present one before the President.
    Worry not!!!

    President apna hi aadmi hai(President is our man).
    If at first you don't succeed, call it v1.0!

  6. #6
    Staff Emeritus
    Join Date
    06 Aug 03
    Posts
    21,433
    Country: Canada
    Quote Originally Posted by Ray
    And then........?
    Sir,

    I don't know if India would accept the conditions. The Senate Bill contains the following

    A determination under section 105 and any waiver under section 104 shall cease to be effective if the President determines that India has detonated a nuclear explosive device after the date of the enactment of this Act.
    Chimo

  7. #7
    Ex-Wabber Defense Professional
    Join Date
    10 Dec 04
    Posts
    7,029
    Country: United States
    Here's the full text of the house version:
    109th CONGRESS

    2d Session

    H. R. 5682

    To exempt from certain requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 a proposed nuclear agreement for cooperation with India.

    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

    June 26, 2006

    Mr. HYDE (for himself, Mr. LANTOS, Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN, Mr. ACKERMAN, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA, Mr. ENGEL, Mr. CROWLEY, and Mr. ETHERIDGE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on International Relations, and in addition to the Committee on Rules, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A BILL
    To exempt from certain requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 a proposed nuclear agreement for cooperation with India.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

    SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the `United States and India Nuclear Cooperation Promotion Act of 2006'.

    SEC. 2. SENSE OF CONGRESS.

    It is the sense of Congress that--

    (1) preventing the proliferation of nuclear weapons, other weapons of mass destruction, the means to produce them, and the means to deliver them are critical objectives for United States foreign policy;

    (2) sustaining the NPT and strengthening its implementation, particularly its verification and compliance, is the keystone of United States nonproliferation policy;

    (3) the NPT has been a significant success in preventing the acquisition of nuclear weapons capabilities and maintaining a stable international security situation;

    (4) countries that have never become a party to the NPT and remain outside that treaty's legal regime pose a potential challenge to the achievement of the overall goals of global nonproliferation, because those countries have not undertaken the NPT's international obligation to prohibit the spread of dangerous nuclear technologies;

    (5) it is in the interest of the United States to the fullest extent possible to ensure that those countries that are not NPT members are responsible with any nuclear technology they develop;

    (6) it may be in the interest of the United States to enter into an agreement for nuclear cooperation as set forth in section 123 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2153) with a country that has never been an NPT member with respect to civilian nuclear technology if--

    (A) the country has demonstrated responsible behavior with respect to the nonproliferation of technology related to weapons of mass destruction programs and the means to deliver them;

    (B) the country has a functioning and uninterrupted democratic system of government, has a foreign policy that is congruent to that of the United States, and is working with the United States in key foreign policy initiatives related to non-proliferation;

    (C) such cooperation induces the country to implement the highest possible protections against the proliferation of technology related to weapons of mass destruction programs and the means to deliver them, and to refrain from actions that would further the development of its nuclear weapons program; and

    (D) such cooperation will induce the country to give greater political and material support to the achievement of United States global and regional nonproliferation objectives, especially with respect to dissuading, isolating, and, if necessary, sanctioning and containing states that sponsor terrorism and terrorist groups, that are seeking to acquire a nuclear weapons capability or other weapons of mass destruction capability and the means to deliver such weapons; and

    (7)(A) India meets the criteria described in this subsection; and

    (B) it is in the national security interest of the United States to deepen its relationship with India across a full range of issues, including peaceful nuclear cooperation.

    SEC. 3. STATEMENTS OF POLICY.

    (a) In General- The following shall be the policies of the United States:

    (1) Oppose the development of a capability to produce nuclear weapons by any non-nuclear weapon state, within or outside of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (21 UST 483; commonly referred to as the `Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty' or the `NPT').

    (2) Encourage states party to the NPT to interpret the right to `develop research, production and use of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes', as described in Article IV of the NPT, as being a qualified right that is conditioned by the overall purpose of the NPT to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and nuclear weapons capability, including by refraining from all nuclear cooperation with any state party that has not demonstrated that it is in full compliance with its NPT obligations, as determined by the IAEA.

    (3) Strengthen the Nuclear Suppliers Group guidelines concerning consultation by members regarding violations of supplier and recipient understandings by instituting the practice of a timely and coordinated response by NSG members to all such violations, including termination of nuclear transfers to an involved recipient, that discourages individual NSG members from continuing cooperation with such recipient until such time as a consensus regarding a coordinated response has been achieved.

    (b) With Respect to South Asia- The following shall be the policies of the United States with respect to South Asia:

    (1) Achieve a moratorium on the production of fissile material for nuclear explosive purposes by India, Pakistan, and the People's Republic of China at the earliest possible date.

    (2) Achieve, at the earliest possible date, the conclusion and implementation of a treaty banning the production of fissile material for nuclear weapons to which both the United States and India become parties.

    (3) Secure India's--

    (A) full participation in the Proliferation Security Initiative;

    (B) formal commitment to the Statement of Interdiction Principles;

    (C) public announcement of its decision to conform its export control laws, regulations, and policies with the Australia Group and with the Guidelines, Procedures, Criteria, and Control Lists of the Wassennaar Arrangement;

    (D) demonstration of satisfactory progress toward implementing the decision described in subparagraph (C); and

    (E) ratification of or accession to the Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage, done at Vienna on September 12, 1997.

    (4) Secure India's full and active participation in United States efforts to dissuade, isolate, and, if necessary, sanction and contain Iran for its efforts to acquire weapons of mass destruction, including a nuclear weapons capability (including the capability to enrich or process nuclear materials), and the means to deliver weapons of mass destruction.

    (5) Seek to halt the increase of nuclear weapon arsenals in South Asia, and to promote their reduction and eventual elimination.

    SEC. 4. WAIVER AUTHORITY AND CONGRESSIONAL APPROVAL.

    (a) In General- Notwithstanding any other provision of law, if the President makes the determination described in subsection (b), the President may--

    (1) exempt a proposed agreement for nuclear cooperation with India (arranged pursuant to section 123 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2153)) from the requirement in section 123 a.(2) of such Act, and such agreement for cooperation may only enter into force in accordance with subsections (f) and (g);

    (2) waive the application of section 128 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2157) with respect to India, provided that such waiver shall cease to be effective if the President determines that India has engaged in any activity described section 129 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 2158), other than section 129 a.(1)(D) or section 129 a.(2)(C) of such Act, at any time after the date of the enactment of this Act; and

    (3) with respect to India--

    (A) waive the restrictions of section 129 a.(1)(A) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2158 a.(1)(A)) for any activity that occurred on or before July 18, 2005; and

    (B) section 129 a.(1)(D) of such Act.

    (b) Determination by the President- The determination referred to in subsection (a) is a determination by the President that the following actions have occurred:

    (1) India has provided the United States and the International Atomic Energy Agency with a credible plan to separate civil and military nuclear facilities, materials, and programs, and has filed a declaration regarding its civil facilities with the IAEA.

    (2) India and the IAEA have concluded an agreement requiring the application of IAEA safeguards in perpetuity in accordance with IAEA standards, principles, and practices (including IAEA Board of Governors Document GOV/1621 (1973)) to India's civil nuclear facilities, materials, and programs as declared in the plan described in paragraph (1), including materials used in or produced through the use of India's civil nuclear facilities.

    (3) India and the IAEA are making substantial progress toward concluding an Additional Protocol consistent with IAEA principles, practices, and policies that would apply to India's civil nuclear program.

    (4) India is working actively with the United States for the early conclusion of a multilateral Fissile Material Cutoff Treaty.

    (5) India is working with and supporting United States and international efforts to prevent the spread of enrichment and reprocessing technology.

    (6) India is taking the necessary steps to secure nuclear and other sensitive materials and technology, including through--

    (A) the enactment and enforcement of comprehensive export control legislation and regulations;

    (B) harmonization of its export control laws, regulations, policies, and practices with the policies and practices of the Missile Technology Control Regime and the Nuclear Suppliers Group; and

    (C) adherence to the MTCR and the NSG in accordance with the procedures of those regimes for unilateral adherence.

    (7) The NSG has decided by consensus to permit supply to India of nuclear items covered by the guidelines of the NSG.

    (c) Submission to Congress-

    (1) IN GENERAL- The President shall submit to the Committee on International Relations of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate information concerning any determination made pursuant to subsection (b), together with a report detailing the basis for the determination.

    (2) INFORMATION TO BE INCLUDED- To the fullest extent available to the United States, the information referred to in paragraph (1) shall include the following:

    (A) A summary of the plan provided by India to the United States and the IAEA to separate India's civil and military nuclear facilities, materials, and programs, and the declaration made by India to the IAEA identifying India's civil facilities to be placed under IAEA safeguards, including an analysis of the credibility of such plan and declaration, together with copies of the plan and declaration.

    (B) A summary of the agreement that has been entered into between India and the IAEA requiring the application of safeguards in accordance with IAEA practices to India's civil nuclear facilities as declared in the plan described in subparagraph (A), together with a copy of the agreement, and a description of the progress toward its full implementation.

    (C) A summary of the progress made toward conclusion and implementation of an Additional Protocol between India and the IAEA, including a description of the scope of such Additional Protocol.

    (D) A description of the steps that India is taking to work with the United States for the conclusion of a multilateral treaty banning the production of fissile material for nuclear weapons, including a description of the steps that the United States has taken and will take to encourage India to identify and declare a date by which India would be willing to stop production of fissile material for nuclear weapons unilaterally or pursuant to a multilateral moratorium or treaty.

    (E) A description of the steps India is taking to prevent the spread of nuclear-related technology, including enrichment and reprocessing technology or materials that can be used to acquire a nuclear weapons technology, as well as the support that India is providing to the United States to further United States objectives to restrict the spread of such technology.

    (F) A description of the steps that India is taking to secure materials and technology applicable for the development, acquisition, or manufacture of weapons of mass destruction and the means to deliver such weapons through the application of comprehensive export control legislation and regulations, and through harmonization and adherence to Missile Technology Control Regime, the Nuclear Suppliers Group, the Australia Group, Wassennaar guidelines, and United Nations Security Council Resolution 1540, and participation in the Proliferation Security Initiative.

    (G) A description of the decision taken within the Nuclear Suppliers Group relating to nuclear cooperation with India, including whether nuclear cooperation by the United States under an agreement for cooperation arranged pursuant to section 123 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2153) is consistent with the decision, practices, and policies of the NSG.

    (H) A description of the scope of peaceful cooperation envisioned by the United States and India that will be implemented under the Agreement for Nuclear Cooperation, including whether such cooperation will include the provision of enrichment and reprocessing technology.

    (d) Restrictions on Nuclear Transfers to India-

    (1) IN GENERAL- Notwithstanding the entry into force of an agreement for cooperation with India pursuant to section 123 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2153) and approved pursuant to this Act, no item subject to such agreement or subject to the transfer guidelines of the NSG may be transferred to India if such transfer would violate the transfer guidelines of the NSG as in effect on the date of the transfer.

    (2) TERMINATION OF NUCLEAR TRANSFERS TO INDIA- Notwithstanding the entry into force of an agreement for nuclear cooperation with India (arranged pursuant to section 123 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2153)), exports of nuclear and nuclear-related material, equipment, or technology to India shall be terminated if India makes any materially significant transfer of--

    (A) nuclear or nuclear-related material, equipment, or technology that does not conform to NSG guidelines, or

    (B) ballistic missiles or missile-related equipment or technology that does not conform to MTCR guidelines,

    unless the President determines that cessation of such exports would be seriously prejudicial to the achievement of United States nonproliferation objectives or otherwise jeopardize the common defense and security.

    (3) PROHIBITION ON NUCLEAR TRANSFERS TO INDIA- If nuclear transfers to India are restricted pursuant to this Act, the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, or the Arms Export Control Act, the President should seek to prevent the transfer to India of nuclear equipment, materials, or technology from other participating governments in the NSG or from any other source.

    (e) Approval of Agreement for Nuclear Cooperation Required-

    (1) IN GENERAL- Subject to subsection (m), an agreement for nuclear cooperation between the United States and India submitted pursuant to this section may become effective only if--

    (A) the President submits to Congress the agreement concluded between the United States and India, including a copy of the safeguards agreement entered into between the IAEA and India relating to India's declared civilian nuclear facilities, in accordance with the requirements and procedures of section 123 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (other than section 123 a.(2) of such Act) that are otherwise not inconsistent with the provisions of this Act; and

    (B) after the submission under subparagraph (A), the agreement is approved by a joint resolution that is enacted into law.

    (2) CONSULTATION- Beginning one month after the date of the enactment of this Act and every month thereafter until the President submits to Congress the agreement referred to in paragraph (1), the President should consult with the Committee on International Relations of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate regarding the status of the negotiations between the United States and India with respect to civilian nuclear cooperation and between the IAEA and India with respect to the safeguards agreement described in subsection (b)(2).

    (f) Joint Resolution- For purposes of this section, a joint resolution referred to in subsection (e)(1)(B) is a joint resolution of the two Houses of Congress--

    (1) the matter after the resolving clause of which is as follows: `That the Congress hereby approves the Agreement for Nuclear Cooperation Between the United States of America and the Republic of India submitted by the President on XXXXXXXXXXX.', with the blank space being filled with the appropriate date;

    (2) which does not have a preamble; and

    (3) the title of which is as follows: `Joint Resolution Approving an Agreement for Nuclear Cooperation Between the United States and India'.

    (g) Introduction and Referral-

    (1) INTRODUCTION- A joint resolution shall, on the day on which the submissions under subsection (e)(1)(A) are made (or, if either House of Congress is not in session on that day, the first day thereafter when that House is in session)--

    (A) be introduced in the House of Representatives by the majority leader, for himself and the minority leader of the House, or by Members of the House designated by the majority leader and minority leader of the House; and

    (B) be introduced in the Senate by the majority leader, for himself and the minority leader of the Senate, or by Members of the Senate designated by the majority leader and minority leader of the Senate.

    If either House of Congress is not in session on that day, the joint resolution shall be introduced on the first day thereafter when both Houses are in session.

    (2) REFERRAL- The joint resolution shall be referred to the Committee on International Relations of the House of Representatives and to the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate.

    (h) Discharge of Committees- If a committee to which a joint resolution is referred has not reported such joint resolution by the end of 60 days beginning on the date of its introduction, or the date of the submission of the nonproliferation assessment statement described in section 123 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2153), whichever is later, such committee shall be discharged from further consideration of such joint resolution, and such joint resolution shall be placed on the appropriate calendar of the House involved.

    (i) Floor Consideration in the House of Representatives-

    (1) IN GENERAL- On or after the third calendar day (excluding Saturdays, Sundays, or legal holidays, except when the House of Representatives is in session on such a day) after the date on which the committee to which a joint resolution is referred has reported, or has been discharged from further consideration of, such a joint resolution, it shall be in order for any Member of the House to move to proceed to the consideration of the joint resolution. A Member of the House may make the motion only on the day after the calendar day on which the Member announces to the House the Member's intention to do so. Such motion shall be privileged and shall not be debatable. The motion shall not be subject to amendment or to a motion to postpone. A motion to reconsider the vote by which the motion is agreed to shall not be in order. If a motion to proceed to the consideration of the joint resolution is agreed to, the House shall immediately proceed to consideration of the joint resolution which shall remain the unfinished business until disposed of.

    (2) DEBATE- Debate on a joint resolution, and on all debatable motions and appeals in connection therewith, shall be limited to not more than six hours, which shall be divided equally between those favoring and those opposing the joint resolution. An amendment to the joint resolution shall not be in order. A motion to further limit debate shall be in order and shall not be debatable. A motion to table, a motion to postpone, or a motion to recommit the joint resolution shall not be in order. A motion to reconsider the vote by which the joint resolution is agreed to or disagreed to shall not be in order.

    (3) APPEALS- Appeals from the decisions of the Chair to the procedure relating to a joint resolution shall be decided without debate.

    (j) Floor Consideration in the Senate- Any joint resolution shall be considered in the Senate in accordance with the provisions of section 601(b)(4) of the International Security Assistance and Arms Export Control Act of 1976.

    (k) Consideration by the Other House- If, before the passage by one House of a joint resolution of that House, that House receives a joint resolution from the other House, then the following procedures shall apply:

    (1) The joint resolution of the other House shall not be referred to a committee and may not be considered in the House receiving it except in the case of final passage as provided in paragraph (2)(B).

    (2) With respect to a joint resolution of the House receiving the joint resolution--

    (A) the procedure in that House shall be the same as if no joint resolution had been received from the other House; but

    (B) the vote on final passage shall be on the joint resolution of the other House.

    (3) Upon disposition of the joint resolution received from the other House, it shall no longer be in order to consider the joint resolution that originated in the receiving House.

    (l) Computation of Days- In the computation of the period of 60 days referred to in subsection (h), there shall be excluded the days on which either House of Congress is not in session because of an adjournment of more than 3 days to a day certain or because of an adjournment of the Congress sine die.

    (m) Section 123 of Atomic Energy Act Not Affected- Notwithstanding subsection (e)(1), this section does not preclude the approval, under section 123 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2153), of an agreement for cooperation in which India is the cooperating party.

    (n) Sunset- The procedures under this section shall cease to be effective upon the enactment of a joint resolution under this section.

    (o) Reports-

    (1) POLICY OBJECTIVES- The President shall, not later than January 31, 2007, and not later than January 31 of each year thereafter, submit to the Committee on International Relations of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate a report on--

    (A) the extent to which each policy objective in section 3(b) has been achieved;

    (B) the steps taken by the United States and India in the preceding calendar year to accomplish those objectives;

    (C) the extent of cooperation by other countries in achieving those objectives; and

    (D) the steps the United States will take in the current calendar year to accomplish those objectives.

    (2) NUCLEAR EXPORTS TO INDIA-

    (A) IN GENERAL- Not later than one year after the date on which an agreement for nuclear cooperation between the United States and India is approved by Congress under section 4(f) and every year thereafter, the President shall submit to the Committee on International Relations of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate a report describing United States exports to India for the preceding year pursuant to such agreement and the anticipated exports to India for the next year pursuant to such agreement.

    (B) NUCLEAR FUEL- The report described in subparagraph (A) shall also include (in a classified form if necessary)--

    (i) an estimate for the previous year of the amount of uranium mined in India;

    (ii) the amount of such uranium that has likely been used or allocated for the production of nuclear explosive devices;

    (iii) the rate of production of--

    (I) fissile material for nuclear explosive devices; and

    (II) nuclear explosive devices; and

    (iv) an analysis as to whether imported uranium has affected such rate of production of nuclear explosive devices.

    (p) Definitions- In this Act:

    (1) IAEA- The term `IAEA' means the International Atomic Energy Agency.

    (2) MTCR- The term `MTCR' means the Missile Technology Control Regime.

    (3) NPT- The term `NPT' means the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons.

    (4) NPT MEMBER- The term `NPT member' means a country that is a party to the NPT.

    (5) NSG- The term `NSG' means the Nuclear Suppliers Group.
    "We will go through our federal budget – page by page, line by line – eliminating those programs we don’t need, and insisting that those we do operate in a sensible cost-effective way." -President Barack Obama 11/25/2008

  8. #8
    Seeker of Rivendell Karthik's Avatar
    Join Date
    15 Dec 04
    Posts
    402
    Country: India
    The scenario looks rather worrisome for the PMO because of the opposition the government is facing in Parliament.

    In fact the PM conceded in the RS yesterday that he was aware of certain clauses in the House bill which were not acceptable to India.

    ab041937,

    Thats okay, but this President has suffered serious setback from Congress. One just hopes that the bipartisan support will see it through.
    "There is no excellence in all this world that can be separated from right living." - David Star Jordan My Blog

  9. #9
    Regular
    Join Date
    24 Sep 05
    Location
    Atlanta GA
    Posts
    119
    Country: United States
    Quote Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers
    Sir,

    I don't know if India would accept the conditions. The Senate Bill contains the following
    That condition I believe has been accepted by India informally. I think its a reality that India has to accept... If we test a nuclear weapon, we are going to be sanctioned regardless of this nuclear deal.

    This deal promotes civil energy, and I'm sure India would make the most of it

  10. #10
    Neo
    Neo is offline
    Neo's Avatar
    Join Date
    06 Apr 05
    Location
    Amsterdam
    Posts
    0
    Country: Pakistan

    India said to retain right to hold tests

    India said to retain right to hold tests

    NEW DELHI - India's prime minister said Wednesday the country would retain its right to carry out future nuclear tests despite a civilian nuclear deal with the United States, a news report said.


    "There is no scope for capping of our strategic (nuclear) program. It will be decided by the people, government and Parliament of the country and not by any outside power," Press Trust of India quoted Prime Minister Manmohan Singh as saying in a statement in Parliament.

    Singh and President Bush signed an agreement in July 2005 that would allow U.S. agencies and companies to sell India nuclear fuel and technology. In return, India would have to strengthen nuclear safeguards, allow international inspections of its civilian facilities, and separate its civilian and military nuclear programs.

    On Wednesday, Singh said also said India would not give any commitment that goes beyond a unilateral moratorium on future nuclear tests.

    If required by the circumstances, he said, India would have the sovereign right to take a decision on atomic tests in its national interest, PTI reported.

    He also said India didn't favor a bilateral comprehensive test ban treaty with the United States. "This has been made unambiguously clear (to the U.S.)," PTI quoted him as saying.

    After its controversial 1998 nuclear tests, India announced a unilateral moratorium on further tests and said it would use nuclear weapons only if attacked.

    Singh's comments in Parliament came in response to criticism by Hindu nationalist opposition and leftist allies who say the government is succumbing to U.S. pressures that allegedly aim to cap India's independent nuclear program.

    The opposition and communist allies sought assurances from Singh that India's nuclear program would not be curbed by what they describe as the shifting of goal posts by U.S. lawmakers.

    The House of Representatives approved the deal last month but added stringent new clauses, including requiring annual certification on the use of the technology and fuel for peaceful purposes.

    The Senate is expected to vote next month on the civilian nuclear plan. The vote will be followed by several other legislative and diplomatic steps before the treaty can be enforced.

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060823/.../india_nuclear

  11. #11
    Ray
    Ray is offline
    Military Professional Ray's Avatar
    Join Date
    20 Aug 03
    Posts
    19,528
    Country: India
    The fun and games begin.

    A large majority and not the Commies alone (who are doing it just to be anti US) are not appreciative of the clauses.

    It is CTBT and NPT (which are inequal treaties) through the backdoor.


    "Some have learnt many Tricks of sly Evasion, Instead of Truth they use Equivocation, And eke it out with mental Reservation, Which is to good Men an Abomination."

    I don't have to attend every argument I'm invited to.

    HAKUNA MATATA

  12. #12
    Soover Abdullah
    Guest
    I am so thrilled. I finally got to navigate into this areas. Why are the people of Chinnai a state in south india so violent. I mean they are all madrassies who go and learn terrroristic actions in Madrassas. No wonder the intellexctuls of bihar and odissa dislike Madrassa educ ated madrassies. Folks am I right in my kuntjechres?

  13. #13
    Staff Emeritus
    Join Date
    06 Aug 03
    Posts
    21,433
    Country: Canada
    As I read this thing, India might as well have signed the NPT and CTBT.
    Chimo

  14. #14
    Arzi Hukumat-e-Azad Hind Senior Contributor Tronic's Avatar
    Join Date
    27 Dec 04
    Location
    Patiala, Punjab
    Posts
    2,839
    Country: India
    Quote Originally Posted by Soover Abdullah
    I am so thrilled. I finally got to navigate into this areas. Why are the people of Chinnai a state in south india so violent. I mean they are all madrassies who go and learn terrroristic actions in Madrassas. No wonder the intellexctuls of bihar and odissa dislike Madrassa educ ated madrassies. Folks am I right in my kuntjechres?
    lol... just because Madras rhymes with Madrassas doesn't mean the two have a connection.... and honestly, people of Bihar and Orissa also don't sit good with the rest.. they frikkin invade other states, work at much lower wages, and rob our own statemen of jobs!!!
    Nabha Sparasham Deeptam
    -Touch The Sky With Glory

  15. #15
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    17 Jan 05
    Posts
    862
    Quote Originally Posted by Tronic
    lol... just because Madras rhymes with Madrassas doesn't mean the two have a connection.... and honestly, people of Bihar and Orissa also don't sit good with the rest.. they frikkin invade other states, work at much lower wages, and rob our own statemen of jobs!!!
    Thats outsourcing..we shudnt be complaining
    What's the difference between people who pray in church and those who pray in casinos?
    The ones in the casinos are serious.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Is the US-India Nuclear Deal good for the US & the world?
    By OrdinaryGuy in forum International Politics
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 28 Jul 06,, 19:34

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts