Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Julie
Saddam should have been removed long ago....all leaders have been too whimpy to do it....yeah and that includes George's Dad as well.
The oil has to be protected since it is their only form of revenue....because it is such an underdeveloped country, otherwise the millions of Iraqis would starve to death. Ancient relics won't feeds millions of people.
I'm from the South, ..... are you insinuating I am "uneducated?"
|
Well they had a reason to attack Iraq when bush's dad was involved and they should have gotten the job done. I agree with that but I don't agree with the current reason to attack Iraq. If they said he had weapons of mass destruction they should have proved it and I think in my opinion which i'm entitled to that this war wasn't worth 1000+ soldiers dying and leaving their loved ones behind for a war that posed no immediate threat considering he ( saddam ) didn't even have enough bullets for his own army.
Listen regarding the oil all I know from my understanding and what I have been reading and watching is that he wanted to have a controlling interest in the oil and i'm not here to initiate arguments so lets leave it at that.
Regarding about the south being uneducated if you took it that way that was not my intention. What I meant is that the educated and noneducated people living in middle america and the south are devout republicans and will always choose them regardless of what they offer it's just what they do. And the outer areas of America chose kerry because they don't care if their republican or democratic all they want is the better person that can do the job.