View Single Post
Old 04-10-2005, 19:35 PM   #14 (permalink)
TopHatter
Administrator
 
TopHatter's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-03-03
Location: Fort Myers FL
Posts: 9,831
Country:
Send a message via AIM to TopHatter
Quote:
Originally Posted by sw55
Ok but don't we need some "blue-water ASW"? Russians still have some good subs, relative to the rest of the world (except the USN and Royal navy of course).
Having them in reserve at least is better than trying to reproduce them. And don't battle groups spend all their time in "blue-water" away from littorals for their defense???
I'm interested. Humor me...
If I may butt in, uninvited

Blue water ASW is all well good and fine, unless that's the only trick in your bag.
OK, you can do blue water ASW and launch 60+ TLAMs. Great.
Except that every DDG and CG in the fleet can do those things and a whole lot more.
What the Navy needs right now is multi-mission ships like the Burkes and VLS Ticos.
You can make a glaring exception out of the Perry-class figs but I'd say they cost a good deal less to operate than a Spruance.
__________________
If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader.
~John Quincy Adams
TopHatter is offline   Reply With Quote