View Single Post
Old 03-28-2005, 22:34 PM   #126 (permalink)
Confed999
Staff Emeritus
 
Confed999's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-10-03
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,681
Country:
Send a message via AIM to Confed999
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anoop C
I think this discussion is being conducted at cross-purposes.

As for women not being allowed in combat operations, isn't that true only for the Army? I remember reading about a female USN pilot (on the F/A-18) who flew missions over Afghanistan.

So the question becomes, is a woman capable of performing the role of an infantry soldier in the current battlefield? The answer seems to be - on an average no, but of course exceptions exist. That answer might change with the evolution of the battlefield, when physical strength and endurance becomes less important and technology does the 'heavy-lifting'. The question then becomes, should the Army provide for exceptions or for the norm? Isn't that cost-benefit analysis best left to the Army?
Good post...
__________________
No man is free until all men are free - John Hossack
I agree completely with this Administration’s goal of a regime change in Iraq-John Kerry
even if that enforcement is mostly at the hands of the United States, a right we retain even if the Security Council fails to act-John Kerry
He may even miscalculate and slide these weapons off to terrorist groups to invite them to be a surrogate to use them against the United States. It’s the miscalculation that poses the greatest threat-John Kerry
Confed999 is offline   Reply With Quote