|
Of course, I brought this up because right now I am studying a case in Civil Procedures where a Navy midshipman was discharged for declaring himself as a homo and he sued to be reinstated. The issue at hand was the Navy allow to inquire whether the guy did homo acts. The guy refused to answer the questions, stating it was unconstitutional and against his 5th amendment rights. The district court ordered him to testify and when he refused, the court dismissed the case. The appellate court reversed the dismissal because the district court was not allowed to ask that question whether the guy did any homo acts. There's more to the story than what I'm telling because it is too long and complicated. Basically, in a nutshell, we are studying the discovery phase in a civil trial and this case serves a good example, for the life I do not understand.
Another thing, I do not understand why I am typing this useless response since I am supposed to be studying but instead, I am jacking off, surfing this board.
Well doh, back to studying.
|