Quote:
|
Originally Posted by tu160mblackjack
The French have excellent and far-reaching special forces. They are also a good military overall, its stupid to think they suck because, they dont.
I dont think countries brought their best special forces to participate in this exercise, or i would have said, that either the rangers, spetsnaz, or some other foriegn team would have won hands-down. Im not saying that indian SFs arent good, but im saying they need better equipment, technology, etc.
|
We should not say that countries didnt bring their best men .
All come to win.
But if its true that countries didnt bring their best men then it implies to India also.
And Indian SF need better equipment, technology....???
Well India bought lots of arms and equipments from Israel for its SFs. there is one thread relating that.
You ll say that Israel's SF have best equipment then now Indians have the same.
When we say SF then all of them whether SEALS or SAS or others will have best equipment no doubt .
and i would like to repeat what i had stated earlier :
Special Forces should be rated by their real time experience. for exp. US , British are using SF in Iraq , so they are having real good experience.
Israel, Russians and Indians are also using their SFs somewhere or around theie countries.
And ITS HAPPENING EVERYDAY
Excellent Training , best equipment and LOTS OF EXPERIENCE
These are some of the main factors which world's best SF have.