Quote:
|
Oh is that what they decided? I guess you had all of "them" under a polygraph and now you know it all, good stuff, you must be a pretty old guy then if you did all that while Sadat was still alive.
|
nope, your guess is wrong, elsadat offered them a peace in 1971, and they refused it, then he switched to the force option, which was to advance in Sinai for 12 km only not to invade israel as said in western countries, if Egyptian army was going to advance for more than 12 km, then why only 80 thousand men out of 800 thousand men crossed the suez canal ?? and why after they destroyed barliev line, they held defensive positions ??, they could have continued marching forward, but they stopped marching even before israeli reinforcements arrived. i do not need to be old to understand things logically, cause it is logic, 1+1=2, can not be any other number.
Quote:
|
Bullcrap, if Syria knew concretely that Israel had nukes prior to the Yom Kippur War then you must be calling their leadership pretty retarded if you think they would have just went along with their plans without a fear of getting nuked. In that case, they'd be better off attacking when Israel's forces are not stretched so thin in the north, because when they are, that makes the possibility of Israel using nukes just that much greater.
|
first, i am not talking about youm kipper war here, i am talking about acquiring biological and chemical weapons till today, and once again you are wrong, i am not calling there leadership pretty retarded, cause anyhow, israel could not have used her nukes, cause if they had used it in 1973, USSR would have erased them off the map. besides if israel nuked Damascus they will risk killing their own people and polluting their food source land by the fallout since israeli border is around 70 km from center of Damascus, and also killing their own soldiers who were even closer to Damascus since they were in gollan heights.
And if they had nuked Cairo, they would have also killed their own soldiers who were only 118 km away from the center of Cairo since 1967 to 1973, and were even closer in 1973 when an israeli division crossed the canal and stood at 101 km from the center of cairo, which means that at average they advanced 17 km from the canal.
Quote:
|
Clarify what you're talking about here.
|
" By IsraelNationalNews.com
A senior aide to Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, Osama el-Baz, announced over the weekend that if Israel makes the "major mistake" and attacks Syria, Syrian would not stand alone.
Egypt announced it would come to Syria's side against Israel. El-Baz added that Israel better think twice before launching attacks against any Arab nations, especially Syria "that fulfills an important role in the peace process."
source:
here
"Egypt Threatens To 'Retaliate' Against Israel
By BENNY AVNI, Staff Reporter of the Sun
January 2, 2008
UNITED NATIONS — As diplomatic tensions between Egypt and Israel escalated yesterday, Jerusalem struggled to find the delicate balance between applying pressure to get better security cooperation from Cairo, and the need to keep Egyptian-Israeli relations from deteriorating further."
rest of the report :
here
"Wednesday, June 18, 2008
From the memory hole: Egypt threatens Israel for criticizing their failure to stop the smuggling
Cairo: This is how we'll wreak diplomatic havoc against Israel
Diplomats: This is how Egypt will wreak diplomatic havoc
Damaged interests in Africa and having Livni declared persona non grata -
hours after Egypt's foreign minister threatens to use diplomatic muscle
against Israel, sources familiar with Israel-Egypt relations tell Ynet
exactly what kind of an impact Jerusalem can expect
Ali Waked YNET Published: 01.01.08, 02:01 / Israel News
www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3488903,00.html"
source:
here
may be first threat only implied using force, but at the end the 3 are threats, and in my opinion the last one is the most dangerous to israel.
one more thing, before accusing me of saying any crab AGAIN, kindly check the world wide web.