|
You could say that. Its a good source for descriptions and pictures, but I wouldnt put any of those numbers into even an unclassified briefing. Some of that stuff is just jaw-droppingly ridiculous. I wish I could throw out an example, but I havent bothered looking at it in several years, so I've long forgotten the biggest eye-rollers.
The problem with sites like that is that even if half of it is accurate, how do you tell what's good info and what's not? It just loses credibility.
|