View Single Post
Old 05-04-2008, 18:42 PM   #10 (permalink)
UnderSpin
Regular
 
Join Date: 04-22-08
Location: USA
Posts: 90
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigfella View Post
I made the mistake of reading this article before I checked the source. Should have saved myself the time.

The article appeared in 'The Australian', a newspaper whose slide from respected conservative daily to second rate conservative propaganda rag has been one of the saddest features of the Australian media over the past decade.

The author, Greg Sheridan, shed all pretence of balanced analysis some time ago. He is best know as Australia's most vocal apologist for the murderous & brutal Soeharto Regime. Indeed, his biggest break with his conservative political patrons was when John Howard intervened to help save East Timorese from rampaging Indonesian-backed militias. Since then Greg has kissed (and kissed and kissed - mostly arse) and made up. He is an experienced foreign affairs commentator, but not one with a shred of credibility.

As for Rudd & China, the man criticised China's behaviour in Tibet while IN BEIJING. How many world leaders have managed this? When China kept insisting their tracksuited thugs surround the Olympic Torch, Rudd backed our police to take care of security, unlike some other nations. He is meeting with Japan's PM twice this year. The issue of selling uranium to India is a Uranium issue, not an India issue. As for multilateral meetings, lets wait a bit more than 6 months before we decide where Rudd is going with this. Indeed, for all this flak, nothing Rudd has done is remotely as craven a kowtow to Beijing as the previous government's abandonment of the 'no comment' posture on the issue of a Chinese attack on Taiwan, yet the likes of Sheridan were hardly shouting the odds about this.

In addition to improving relations with China while simultaneously calling it on human rights, Rudd has: kept the US alliance strong despite pulling our troops out of Iraq; been the first Australian leader to address NATO; brought Australia into line with the world on the Kyoto Protocol; restored battered relations our Pacific neighbours. He even made the top 10 in Time's 100 most influential people.

It is little wonder that conservatives like Sheridan are livid - their departed hero crippled our international credibility at a vital time by expressing a desire to be America's 'Deputy Sherrif' in the region, and then spending years acting as if he meant it. Rudd has achieved more overseas in 6 months than Howard did in a decade. The region should worry less & have a little faith. Greg Sheridan should stop pretending he is conducting 'analysis' and just admit it is propaganda.
Great comments, Bigfella.

I find Greg Sheridan’s view of international relationship very childish. Kindergarteners’ typical behavior is to play with the kids they like. So his whining “you don’t like me … you play with him all day and you don’t play with me” is appropriate for kindergarteners.

Grownups should not behavior like that. A matured adult’s behavior should be appropriate to his/her role in the community. Rudd is playing a leader role in Asia. He leverages his Mandarin skills and his knowledge of Chinese culture to calm down China, stabilize the region and push for human rights inside China. There is simply no other leader in the world that can play this critical role. In doing so, Rudd not only benefits Austrian and Chinese, he also reduces tension for all people in the world. He has earned his place on the Time 100 list.

The kindergarten’s view has a win-lose mentality: If Rudd pays that much attention to China then he can’t play enough attention to me. We need a win-win mentality for international relationship: Rudd is helping Australia, China and the rest of the world at the same time.
UnderSpin is offline   Reply With Quote