View Single Post
Old 05-03-2008, 11:55 AM   #105 (permalink)
svguy
Banished
 
Join Date: 05-03-08
Posts: 20
Quote:
Originally Posted by Parihaka View Post
No actually it's about .28% of total greenhouse (anthro & natural) gases, not .3 of total atmosphere.
It's (anthropogenic co2) contribution to the greenhouse effect is about .117%
I think your math is off.

Quote:
No actually it's about .28% of total greenhouse (anthro & natural) gases
Tomayto, tomahto... Your "by volume" theory really has no point, whether you cite "total" GHG or or "total" gases overall. The point is the total thermal signature of the uptick, and the genesis of the uptick.

Quote:
It's (anthropogenic co2) contribution to the greenhouse effect is about .117%
C02 by itself contributes somewhere between 9-25-ish% of the greenhouse effect. (Per your cohort Shek, and many other public sources)

Current levels of CO2 are at 384 ppm, or .0384%; up about 100 ppm from the late 50's - early 60's. (both facts well documented)

Anthro sources of the CO2 can be directly tied to the uptick. (Per direct carbon ratio studies)

Your number does not work out very well in these well established numbers.
svguy is offline   Reply With Quote