Quote:
Originally Posted by Army5339
Thing is they did say them.
If it was phrased another way, it could easily read, "America probably deserves terrorism, because God is angry at our lack of morality regarding homosexuals, feminism, and pagans." Which sounds extraordinarily similar to Wright's diatribe following 9/11.
Of course they retracted them, they stood to lose millions in funding, and by connection, salary. Retraction doesn't equal a change in belief.
They honestly believe those things, and in a period of PR disaster, admitted as such. You can not "take back" certain things, especially something like Americans deserved to be the recipient of a terrorist attack.
|
Your reaching. If you refer back to the way people have historically speculated about such things you'd realize you're basically just projecting what you want to see. You have less then nothing to back up your ultra-spin version.
Obama's pastors claiming the US Government purposefully developed HIV to keep the Colored people down is not even remotely as benign as the above. Nevermind moral equivalence logic is the proxy of snakes in the grass.
Didn't your mother ever tell you two wrongs don't make a right?