View Single Post
Old 04-23-2008, 23:32 PM   #193 (permalink)
zraver
Contrary by nature.
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 10-22-06
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 3,134
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by imishin View Post
There wasn't really a problem with languages in the Soviet armed forces. My father was a Captain-Leutenant in the Navy, a submariner, reactor-maintenance, served on the Komsomolets (but thats a different story, he is alive too btw he was on a leave than it sank, he later went into R&D until the Union collapsed). One of his high school buddies whom he still knows was an officer on a diesel sub. He told my father that they had a lot of native Siberians, Yakutians and so on in their crew, he joked "Came down from a mountain to buy some medicine for his deer and got dragged into the navy." about them. A lot of them didn't speak Russian so the solution was simple, you don't understand the order you get a fist to the face, still don't understand it, the procedure gets repeated, by the end of the first month all of them spoke Russian.
The Soviet Navy and IIRC the VVS used a 3 year hitch and got a better quality recruit especially once the military got technical. The Red Army got 2 year hitches and lower grade recruits and that makes a world of difference. With lower quality of recruits you have to do more training, but with 2 year conscriptions you have less time to do it in.
zraver is offline   Reply With Quote