Quote:
Originally Posted by Adux
S-2,
Whatever happened to the notion that terrorist were illiterate people living under poverty stricken conditions? And this in the NYT, don't they realize they are basically contradicting with their stated views on WoT.
|
I don't understand the trashing of the Times could you give me an example of their inaccuracies? other than overstating the Iraqi threat I haven't seen a lot of their WoT coverage being contradicted by any source of record. You act like they print articles sympathetic to AQ...SHOW ME ONE or Check yourself.
You forget where they attacked in 2001. Everyone in NY saw what happened. Everyone in NY saw the probably millions of posters asking if people saw loved ones including people at the NY times. You could smell the attack in the air for as long as the media ran those awful clips of people jumping out of windows to avoid being burnt to death. Almost everyone in NY was touched by it. Almost everyone in the tri state area knows someone who lost a friend or family member. I really think you need to check yourself on the NYtimes. Just because you don't like their opinion page doesn't make their news reporting any less the paper of record in this country. No one wants to see that bastard Osma Bin Laden and his ilk burn more than the people directly impacted by the attacks. to people who saw or were effected by that devastating attack the hatred is like a blood oath. The people most effected by the attack are the ones buying the Times at the newsstand.