|
Very nice.
I can see something of a cross between the two coming to fruition.
Just some of my observations (I'm no expert, so take it with a grain of salt).
The need for four (4) 16/50 turrets? Myself I think two triple mounts, or two double mounts would work (like on the Constitution design). I think with advances in guidance and accuracy it reduces the amount of rifles needed, but is balanced with potential of putting mass volumes of fire on target.
The same applies to the secondary mounts. I can see single mounts... One per flank... maybe two per side. I say single mounts 5/54 or 5/62, because that is what is already out there, and for $$$ sake.
Whether to keep 16/50" or reduce the size to 12/54" I'm undecided. Whatever option that flies, the Navy has to make a long term committment to using that platform and system. I suppose the infrastructure is still around to logistically support 16/50"... But I imagine 12/54" would be more economical in the long run.
My $.02
|