Originally Posted by snc128

I mean to say, multi-partnership without mariage or without any social tie other than bodily desire. let me ask again,if polygamy is a primitive subject, how can polygamy's non-marriage form,namely rascality (we,men,make us believe this word's innocence and deceive our partners), be described? it is a foxy way of following our desires.
when a man deceives his partner, it is more primitive than doing it by permission (permission : like a 2nd marriage.). actually,both are impolite against ladies but unfortunately this is our nature.

Rascality? That's a good one!
I expect everyone to be able to decide what is, or is not moral for themselves. In my view it is not up to religion, the law or anything else to impose it. There are things that are lawful that I consider immoral. We are supposed to hold our own moral compass. Consider the difference between moral, immoral and amoral and you can see why many won't even debate the subject.



this is another definition for sure, which is medical. however,I like social approaches more than even religious ones.