Quote:
Originally Posted by glyn
We already have the word 'polygamy' for marriages. Do we need another?
|
I mean to say, multi-partnership without mariage or without any social tie other than bodily desire.
let me ask again,if polygamy is a primitive subject, how can polygamy's non-marriage form,namely
rascality (we,men,make us believe this word's innocence and deceive our partners), be described? it is a foxy way of following our desires.
when a man deceives his partner, it is more primitive than doing it by permission (permission : like a 2nd marriage.). actually,both are impolite against ladies but unfortunately this is our nature.
Quote:
|
The word moral needs defining. It is not just a religious construct. Sexually transmitted diseases are prevalent. These must be taken into consideration - and the prophylactic measures are widely available.
|
this is another definition for sure, which is medical. however,I like social approaches more than even religious ones.
