[quote=Cactus;477034]Two things:
Quote:
|
1. The NATO negotiations with the Russians have not even begun yet, so it would really be jumping to conclusion.
|
Agreed
My question is, wont the idea of opening up a new supply route directly linked to reduce dependency on Pakistan. Which inturn might open up Pakistan for NATO operations.
Quote:
|
2. Notice I mentioned that if the pre-condition 1 is successfully concluded, a "vast array of diplomatic and military solutions" will be opened. In the end it will ultimately come down to how creative the allied diplomats are, as well as how pragmatic the Pakistani democratic leadership will be. Nine out of ten options needn't lead to Trans-Durand Line military action at all; one option is the military action.
|
I know you are very knowledgble especially about the area in question,
Is it not true that most of the terror camps are not in the control of Pakistan Government anymore. Isnt it also true that Terror camps meant for Kashmir is now being used for training people in Afghanistan and also Taliban do seek refuge and base their operations from Pakistan's side of the border
So is it really far fetched that this 'democratic' government of Pakistan may have made a diplomatic and strategic blunder in changing its stance on WoT and US.