[quote]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tangyiying
well, it could be news to Indians
|
And so is it to the world!
Quote:
|
Reasoning? or do you Indians have different definition of legitimacy?
|
Not quite in the same way as the PRC maybe, where legitimacy is decided by the Party!!
Quote:
Well, when Britain conquered India in old times when conquering was regarded legal by the so called “civilized world”. India did was part of Britain empire. So the Tibet which was conquered by the Qing was no questionable part of Qing Empire. We should be clear at this point.
When the Qing Empire collapsed, the successor ROC had the legitimacy to inherent Qing’s territory and all its property according to the international laws by then. This includes the rule over Tibet. The dalai regime was merely rebellion in the eyes of ROC. It by no means was a legitimate government..
|
What is in the eyes of the ROC is in their eyes.
It does not make it the truth!
Quote:
|
well, the ROC local government of Tibet which should be co-led by Panchen Lama and Dalai Lama was overthrown and Panchen was droven out by the Dalai, it became an internal matter of Republic of China.
|
Good.
What else is the internal matter of China?
Quote:
|
Nationalists was the ruling party of ROC. It cooperated quite well with British till Chiang Kai Shek the head of KMT met Ghandi secretly that turned the British aganist China by restarting their war in Tibet.
|
Really?
No.
__________________
"Some have learnt many Tricks of sly Evasion, Instead of Truth they use Equivocation, And eke it out with mental Reservation, Which is to good Men an Abomination."
I don't have to attend every argument I'm invited to.
HAKUNA MATATA