Quote:
Originally Posted by 7thsfsniper
PLEASE, pick "A". You don't want to get bigfella started. I think he can type like 900wpm. and is a human thesaurus.  Just kidding you bigfella
I've been observing this thread closely and I'm going to have to give my vote so far to adux on this argument. |
Which argument is that?
1. There is widespread intolerance and dislike for interfaith dialog in the Muslim world.
2. The Pakistani political Parties I mentioned do not stand for equality and rights for all
3. A religious State of any sort cannot provide equality to its citizens
4. Only an Islamic State cannot provide equality to its citizens
Quote:
|
I think it simply comes down to anything in its extreme (religous or not) can be very damaging when it suppresses thought, speach and basic human rights, which by way should need no debate of definition. Without these things we could have never went to the moon. (and yes, we went, no conspiracy theories please, it gives me a headache)
|
I think we all agree on that - Adux's last post seems to raise the question of whether a religious State (extreme or moderate), though he seems to particularly dislike Islam over other religions as I gathered from one of his posts above, cannot provide equality to its non-Muslim citizens.