View Single Post
Old 03-22-2008, 10:08 AM   #53 (permalink)
Sinister
Regular
 
Sinister's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-12-08
Posts: 56
Quote:
Originally Posted by el_guapo View Post
Vietnam battles were won by the US. Mujadeen were beating the Soviets in tactics on the ground. Huge difference. The west could of invaded Soviet Union. US could invade anywhere in the world. Gulf War massed what half a million troops for a war that didn't last a week? Come on dude. You got it wrong. It's the other way around. The Soviets couldn't invade the USA. Again it's the US logistics capability that makes the US military capable of bringing wars to anywhere in the world, and no other military surpasses it, not even close. I don't know where you been at.

Politically American people will back wars if it means the country's existance is at stake. Simple answer yes.
How could the USA invade something as sheer sized as soviet union that had SEVERAL TIMES better tehnology , and SEVERAL TIMES more tanks , planes , submarines , ships , soldiers than Iraq has now , you seriusly don't know what your talking about.
Sinister is offline   Reply With Quote