View Single Post
Old 03-19-2008, 12:39 PM   #48 (permalink)
scorefour
Regular
 
Join Date: 10-17-07
Location: Utah
Posts: 79
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tin Man View Post
Tarek, this is a huge problem. It is very difficult, a stealthy pod standing on a Bi-static test rig on its own may be ok and reflect zip.
When you hang it on a pylon, the radar picture becomes far more complex and the pod could actually increase total radar returns because of the way it interacts with the rest of the airframe. Its a real muddle. The pylon itself will even have to have the same attention as the pod and be stealthy. We could see some very strangely shaped pods! Remember though that they can`t increase drag too much. Conformal weapons pods that stay with the aircraft sound like the best way to go for me, blended to the body of the aircraft. Any of them may impose drag or other penalties.

This is all true, which explains why not everybody is already doing this. This is also why the USAF isn't showing pictures of their pods.

I found an article that sort of talks about the external pods a little. I've read about them several times, but don't have time to find more right now.


Aviation Week : USAF Weighs Four Skunk Works Designs for Interim Strike

Anyone know if Meteor eventually will make it on British F-35's?
__________________
I want what I do not have.
scorefour is offline   Reply With Quote