World Affairs Board - View Single Post

Herodotus · 02-28-2008, 19:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by T_igger_cs_30

I think you will find I have not if you read my earlier post, my "opinion" (and it is ok to have an opinion about things, just as long as you accept others)
However without question , Bluesman is one of a few who's statements regarding such matters I will read, digest and accept without question as he has proved through this board to me that he is sincere and has integrity(not to say you do not H) Also given his position, and experience that helps to validate his posts.
So just to argue my "opinion" against his documentation and experience would be an insult to him and this board.
I have to keep it as an opinion as I cannot break certain confidences to validate it as anything else, other than an "opinion" at this time.

[B]So do you believe that Saddam had some hand in 9/11? Ah yes, here is your post, my apologies:

[i]It has been proved that an absolute direct link is difficult to prove, but I think it is fair to say there was some "indirect" links to 9/11, support for AQ, terrorism in general is beyond doubt, Wolfowitz possibly had his own agenda, but I think was on the money

[b]Bluesman's first post stated that he thought Saddam's Iraq was taken by surprise by 9/11, and I thought most other posters agreed. However if he, or you, or anyone has evidence to the contrary about the rationale for the war they are more than welcome to share it if it doesn't violate sources and methods.

(I may have misinterpeted your post T igger, I thought you were referring to Bluesman's knowledge of the rationale for the Iraq war, now I think you are referring to his comments on the 9/11-Iraq link. If I have misinterpeted you sorry.)